UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(AMENDMENT NO.   )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) orunder Section 240.14a-2.

LOGO

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
        

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and 0-12.0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 

 

(2)

 

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 

 

(3)

 

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

 

 

(4)

 

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

 

 

(5)

 

 

Total fee paid:

      
  

 

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

 

 

(2)

 

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

 

 

(3)

 

 

Filing Party:

 

  

 

 

 

(4)

 

 

Date Filed:

 

  

 

 

 

 


LOGO

DOVER CORPORATION 2019 PROXY Since 1955 Redefining what’s possibleLOGO


Notice of 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

May 6, 2022

May 2, 2019

1:9:00 p.m. Easterna.m. Central Time

Conrad Fort Lauderdale BeachDover Corporation Headquarters

551 North Fort Lauderdale Beach Boulevard3005 Highland Parkway

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304Downers Grove, Illinois 60515

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend ourthe Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Dover Corporation (“Dover” or the “Company”) at the Conrad Fort Lauderdale Beach hotelour headquarters on May 2, 20196, 2022 at 1:9:00 p.m.a.m., EasternCentral Time, to be held for the following purposes:

 

 1.

To elect nineten directors.

 

 2.

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.2022.

 

 3.

To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive officer (“NEO”) compensation.

 

 4.

To approve amendmentsconsider a shareholder proposal regarding the right to Article 15 of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation (our “charter”)allow shareholders to eliminate the super-majority voting requirement.act by written consent, if properly presented.

 

 5.

To approve amendments to Article 16 of our charter to eliminate the super-majority voting requirement.

6.

To consider such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, including any adjournments or postponements thereof.

All holders of record at the close of business on March 8, 20199, 2022 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares as soon as possible.

March 21, 201917, 2022

By authority of the Board of Directors,

Ivonne M. Cabrera

Secretary


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Notice of 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

  

Proxy Statement Summary

1

Annual Meeting Information

   1 

Annual Meeting InformationItems of Business

   1 

Items of BusinessHow to Submit Your Proxy

   1 

How to Cast Your Vote

1

Company Overview

   2 

20182021 Performance Overview

   4 

CEO SuccessionGovernance Highlights

5

Board Refreshment

5

New Finance Committee

5

Shareholder Engagement

5

Management Proposals to Remove Super-Majority Voting Provisions

6

Executive Compensation

   7 

Shareholder Engagement

7

Director NomineesExecutive Compensation

   8 

Board CompositionDirector Nominees

   9 

Governance Highlights

9

Proposal 1 — Election of DirectorsBoard Composition

   10 
Proposal 1 — Election of Directors11

Criteria for Director Nominees

   1011 

Director Nomination Process

10

2019 Director Nominees

   12 

2022 Director Nominees

13

Board Oversight and Governance Practices

   2023 

Shareholder Engagement and History of Board Responsiveness

   2831 

SustainabilityEnvironmental, Social, and Governance Oversight (ESG)

   3033 

Directors’ Compensation

   3235 

Proposal 2 —  Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   3437 

Audit Committee Report

   3538 

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   3639 

Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   3639 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   3840 

Executive Summary

38

2018Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote and Shareholder Outreach

   40 

Dover’s Alignment with Leading Compensation Governance Practices

41

Compensation Process: Aligning Business StrategySay on Pay Vote Results and PerformanceShareholder Engagement

   42 

Dover’s Alignment with Leading Compensation Governance Practices

43

Compensation Principles

44

Compensation Process

45

Elements of Executive Compensation

   4649

Other Benefits

58

Other Elements of Compensation

60

Compensation Committee Report

61

Executive Compensation Tables

62

Summary Compensation Table

62

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2021

64

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2021

66

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2021

67

Pension Benefits through 2021

68 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

2019 Changes to our ExecutiveNonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2021

   5369

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

70 

Other Benefits

53

Other Elements of Compensation

54

Compensation Committee Report

56

Executive Compensation Tables

57

Summary Compensation Table

57

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018

60

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End 2018

62

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2018

64

Pension Benefits through 2018

65

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2018

67

Potential Payments upon Termination orChange-in-Control

68

Potential Payments in Connection with aChange-in-Control (Without Termination)

72

Potential Payments upon Termination Following aChange-in-Control

74

Proposal 3 — Advisory Resolution to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

75

Management Proposals

   76 
Shareholder Proposal77

Background of ProposalsProposal 4 and 5– Shareholder Proposal Regarding the Right to Act by Written Consent

   7677 

Proposal 4 —  Approval of Amendments to Article 15 of Our Charter to Eliminate Super-Majority Voting RequirementShare Ownership Information

   7880 

Proposal 5 —  ApprovalSecurity Ownership of Amendments to Article 16 of Our Charter to Eliminate Super-Majority Voting Requirement

79

Share Ownership InformationCertain Beneficial Owners and Management

   80 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

80

General Information About the Annual Meeting

   83

Appendix A —  Proposed Amendment to Article Fifteenth of Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Eliminate the Super-majority Vote Requirement Explained in Proposal 4

A-1

Appendix B —  Proposed Amendment to Article Sixteenth of Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Eliminate the Super-majority Vote Requirement Explained in Proposal 5

B-182 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement ii


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Annual Meeting Information

 

Date: May 2, 20196, 2022
Time: 1:9:00 p.m.a.m., EasternCentral Time
Record Date: March 8, 20199, 2022
Location: 

Conrad Fort Lauderdale BeachDover Corporation Headquarters

551 North Fort Lauderdale Beach Boulevard3005 Highland Parkway

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304Downers Grove, Illinois 60515

 For additional information about our Annual Meeting, please see “General Information About Thethe Annual Meeting”. We are first mailing this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement beginning on or about March 17, 2022.

Items of Business

There are fivefour proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

 

ITEM

 

  

Proposal

 

  

 

Board Voting
Recommendation

 

  

Page

Reference  

 ITEM 1      

The election of nine nominees for director

FOR each director nominee

 

 
10

 

ITEM 21

 

  

 

The election of ten nominees for director

FOR each director
nominee

11  

ITEM 2  

The ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20192022

FOR34

 ITEM 3 

  

 

FOR

37  

ITEM 3

An advisory resolution to approve NEO compensation

 

  

FOR

 

  75

76  

 

 

ITEM 4

 

  

 

To approve amendmentsA shareholder proposal regarding the right to Article 15 of our charterallow shareholders to eliminate the super-majority voting requirementact by written consent, if properly presented

FOR78

 ITEM 5 

  

 

To approve amendments to Article 16 of our charter to eliminate the super-majority voting requirementAGAINST

 

  FOR

77  

79

How to CastSubmit Your VoteProxy

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please castsubmit your voteproxy as soon as possible using one of the following methods:

 

Viainternet by visiting www.proxyvote.com

 

Viatelephone by calling1-800-690-6903

 

Viamail by marking, signing and dating your proxy card or voting instruction form (if you received proxy materials by mail) and returning it to the address listed therein



 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


 

Company Overview

Dover is a diversified global manufacturer and solutions provider delivering innovative equipment and components, specialty systems, consumable supplies, aftermarket parts, software and digital solutions, and support services through threefive operating segments: Engineered Systems, FluidsProducts, Clean Energy & Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions, and RefrigerationClimate & Food Equipment. OurSustainability Technologies. We combine global scale, operational agility, world-class engineering capability, and customer intimacy to lead the markets we serve. Recognized for our entrepreneurial business model encourages, promotes, and fosters deep customer engagement and collaboration, which has ledapproach for over 60 years, our team of over 25,000 employees takes an ownership mindset, collaborating with customers to Dover’s well-established and valued reputation for providing superior customer service and industry-leading product innovation.

Our businesses are aligned in three segments structured around our key end markets and designed to support focused growth strategies. Our segment structure also allows us to leverage our scale and channel presence, and capitalize on productivity initiatives.redefine what’s possible.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Management Philosophy

 

Our leadershipexecutive management team is committed to generatingsteadily creating shareholder value through a combination of sustained long-term profitable growth, operational excellence, and superior free cash-flow generation.

cash flow generation, and productive capital Our operating culturere-deployment fosters high ethical standards that value accountability, rigor, trust, respect, and open communications, designedwhile adhering to allow individual growth and operational effectiveness.a conservative financial policy.

 

Our businesses seek to be leaders in our enda diverse set of growing markets as measuredwhere customers are loyal to trusted partners and suppliers, and value product performance and differentiation driven by market share,superior engineering, manufacturing precision, total solution development, and excellent supply chain performance.

Our companies are long-time leaders in their respective markets and are known for their innovation, engineering capability, and customer satisfaction, growth, and return on invested capital.service excellence.

 

Our sustainable business practices are focused on reducing environmental impact and developing products that help our customers meet their sustainability goals.

Our operating structure of threefive business segments allows for focuseddifferentiated acquisition activity, acceleratesfocus consistent with our portfolio and capital allocation priorities which, coupled with functional expertise at our corporate center, presents opportunities to identify and capture operating synergies, includingsuch as global sourcing and supply chain integration, shared services, and manufacturing and advances the development of our executive talent.practices.

 

Our segment and executive management team teams formulate strategy, developsets strategic direction, initiatives and goals, provides oversight of strategy execution and oversee progress byachievement of these goals for our operating companies on these matters,business segments, and with oversight from our Board of Directors (“Board”(our “Board”), makemakes capital allocation decisions, regardingincluding organic investment initiatives, major capital projects, acquisitions, and the return of capital to our shareholders.

 

Our businessesoperating culture are committedfosters high ethical and performance standards, values accountability, rigor, trust, inclusion, respect, and open communications, and is designed to creating value for our customers, employees,encourage individual growth and shareholders through sustainable business practices that protect the environment and the development of products that help our customers meet their sustainability goals.operational effectiveness.



 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 2


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


 

Company Goals

We are committed to driving superior shareholder return through three key objectives:tenets of our corporate strategy.

First, we are committed toachieving organic sales growth above gross domestic product growth (or 3% to 5% annually on average) over a long-term business cycle, absent prolonged adverse economic conditions, complemented bygrowth through strategic acquisitions.

Second, we continue to focus onimproving returns on capital and segment margins through effective cost management and productivity initiatives, including supply chain activities, targeted restructuring activities, strategic pricing, and portfolio management.

Third, we aim to generatefree cash flow as a percentage of sales of approximately8-12% through strong earnings performance, productivity improvements, and active working capital management.

LOGO

We are committed to achieving organic sales growth above global gross domestic product growth (greater than GDP or 3% to 5% annually on average) over a long-term business cycle, absent prolonged adverse economic conditions, complemented by growth through strategic acquisitions.

LOGO

We are focused on improving returns on capital, as well as segment and corporate earnings margins by enhancing our operational capabilities and making investments across the organization in digital capabilities, automation, operations management, information technology, shared services, and talent. We also focus on continuous, effective cost management and productivity initiatives, including automation and digitally-supported manufacturing, supply chain optimization, e-commerce and digital go-to-market, restructuring activities, improved footprint utilization, strategic pricing and portfolio management.

LOGO

We aim to generate strong and growing free cash flow and earnings per share (“EPS”)through strong earnings performance, productivity improvements, and active working capital management.

We support achievement of these goals through (1) alignment ofby aligning management compensation with strategic and financial objectives, (2) well-definedactively managing our portfolio to increase enterprise scale, improve business mix over time, and actively managed mergerspursuing acquisitions that fit the characteristics of an ideal Dover business, and acquisitions (“M&A”) processes, and (3)investing in talent development programs.

Our Strategic Priorities2021 Financial Results

In 2021, we continued our long track record of delivering value to Realize Earnings and Growth Potentialour shareholders, despite an operational environment that continues to present challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

    

US GAAP

  FY2021     FY2020     Δ    

        Revenue ($M)

   7,907      6,684      18%

        Net earnings ($M)(1)

   1,124      683      64%

        Diluted EPS ($)

   7.74      4.70      65%

Non-GAAP(2)

                   

        Organic revenue change

           15%

        Adjusted net earnings ($M)(3)

   1,109      824      35%

        Adjusted diluted EPS ($)

   7.63      5.67      35%

LOGO(1)Full year 2021 and 2020 net earnings include rightsizing and other costs of $31.1 million and $40.7 million, respectively. Full year 2020 also includes a $3.9 million non-cash gain on the sale of AMS Chino, and full year 2021 also includes a $135.1 million gain on the sale of Unified Brands and a $18.0 million gain related to the sale of our Race Winning Brands equity method investment.

Near Term Strengthen Execution, Deliver(2)Definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are included at the end of this proxy statement.

(3)Full year 2021 and 2020 adjusted net earnings exclude acquisition-related amortization costs of $107.2 million and $104.1 million, respectively, and rightsizing and other costs of $31.1 million and $40.7 million, respectively. Full year 2020 also excludes a $3.9 million non-cash gain on Commitments Focusthe sale of AMS Chino, and full year 2021 also excludes a $135.1 million gain on margin improvement through cost rightsizing Use portionthe sale of SG&A savingsUnified Brands and a $18.0 million gain related to fund key strategic initiatives — operational talent, e-commerce and digital and R&D Deliver on SG&A rightsizing initiative Improve performance in Retail Fueling & Transportation and Retail Refrigeration Continue organic growth and productivity investments Completed $1 B buyback program in 2018; opportunistically undertake repurchases Pursue bolt-on M&A around existing platforms Comprehensive footprint evaluation — Rightsizing began in 04 2018 Longer Term Realize Dover's Earnings and Growth Potential Invest behind Dover's leading businesses to capture growth potential Solidify focus on reliable execution as a key tenetthe sale of the Dover culture Further opportunity for margin improvement: footprint rationalization, automation Pursue inorganic opportunities to build out Dover platforms: gain scale, growth exposure, customer relevance, efficiency Repurchase own stock opportunistically Continue to grow dividendour Race Winning Brands equity method investment.



 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

2021 Performance Overview

Portfolio & Strategic Actions

•   In 2021, we completed 9 acquisitions. The acquisitions of Acme Cryogenics, Inc. (“Acme Cryogenics”), Engineered Controls International, LLC (“RegO”) and LIQAL B.V. (“LIQAL”) within the Clean Energy & Fueling segment complement our existing operations and expand our evolving fueling portfolio toward clean energy.

•   As part of the regular review of our portfolio and the fit of our businesses, we completed the sale of Unified Brands within the Climate & Sustainability Technologies segment and our Race Winning Brands equity method investment within the Engineered Products segment.

•   In recognition of recent portfolio changes, we recently changed the name of the Fueling Solutions segment to “Clean Energy & Fueling,” and the Refrigeration & Food Equipment segment to “Climate & Sustainability Technologies” to better reflect the markets and customers served by the businesses within these segments.

Strong Operational Execution and

Profitability

•   Increased revenue, profitability, and earnings per share despite a challenging global business environment caused by COVID-19.

•   We continued to execute on our broad-based multi-year efficiency and margin expansion program, designed to reduce our selling, general and administrative cost base and rationalize our manufacturing and supply chain footprint across the portfolio.

•   Continuing to build upon our four enterprise capabilities in support of margin expansion initiatives.

-   We are continuing to (1) leverage our Digital Labs team to improve our internal and market-facing digital capabilities, (2) improve utilization and optimization of our manufacturing footprint through centralized resources and investment, (3) further centralize shared services under Dover Business Services, and (4) invest in our India Innovation Center shared services with a focus on engineering capabilities.

•   Synergy capture from recent acquisitions presents additional margin upside.

Disciplined
Capital
Allocation

•   We made 9 strategic bolt-on acquisitions — the most since 2016 — for an aggregate consideration of $1,125.1 million, net of cash acquired and including contingent consideration, that enhance our businesses with new capabilities and attractive end-market exposures.

•   We continued our history of providing regular capital returns to shareholders by increasing our quarterly dividend, marking our 66thconsecutive year of dividend increases.

•   We made $171.5 million in capital expenditures in 2021, representing 2.2% of revenue, in line with our priority of organic reinvestment to grow and strengthen our existing businesses.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 4


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

2021 Performance Overview, cont.

Cash Flow
Generation

•   We generated free cash flow(1) of $944 million, representing 11.9% of revenue and 84.0% of net earnings as a result of broad-based cost-control efforts and proactive working capital management. Cash flow provided by operating activities was $1,115.9 million.

ESG
Initiative

•   We made progress on several fronts in line with our three-year plan to expand the scope and robustness of our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices and disclosures.

-   We announced science-based targets to reduce our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions, including an absolute reduction of scope 1 and scope 2 market-based GHG emissions of 30 percent by 2030 (from a 2019 baseline year), and an absolute reduction of scope 3 GHG emissions of 15 percent by 2030 (from a 2019 baseline year).

-   Given the increasing focus on climate risk, we conducted a climate risk assessment and scenario analysis aligned with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) reporting framework and published a summary of the results to further improve transparency regarding our ESG areas of focus.

•   We established a working group with four of our largest operating companies by emissions designed to embed sustainability considerations into product development in 2021.

•   We announced a goal of reducing Total Recordable Injury Rate (“TRIR”) by 40% by 2025 (from a 2019 baseline year).

(1) Definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are included at the end of this proxy statement.


DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 5


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Total Shareholder Return

In 2021, we continued our long track record of delivering superior value-creation to our shareholders.

Total Shareholder Return1,2

LOGO

Note : These figures represent annualized returns.

1)   End date for returns periods is December 31, 2021.

2)   Annualized Total Shareholder Return including dividends and spin-offs. Fortive Corporation went public in July 2016 and Ingersoll-Rand merged with Gardner Denver in March 2020. Both stocks are excluded from periods prior to go public / merger dates. Source: Capital IQ

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 6


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

2018 Performance OverviewGovernance Highlights

Our Board is committed to sound governance practices designed to promote the long-term interests of shareholders and strengthen Board and management accountability. Highlights include:

    

US GAAP from continuing operations

  

FY2018

   

FY2017

   

D

 

Revenue ($M)

  

 

6,992

 

  

 

6,821

 

  

 

3%

 

Earnings ($M)

  

 

591

 

  

 

747

 

  

 

(21%

Diluted EPS ($)

  

 

3.89

 

  

 

4.73

 

  

 

(18%

 

Non-GAAP(1) from continuing operations

            

Adjusted Earnings ($M)

  

 

756

 

  

 

655

 

  

 

15%

 

Adjusted diluted EPS ($)

  

 

4.97

 

  

 

4.15

 

  

 

20%

 

 

(1)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

DefinitionsGOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

 Independent Board leadership

 In 2020, adopted a diversity search policy for external director and reconciliationsChief Executive Officer (“CEO”) searches conducted by third-party search firms

 All directors are independent, other than the CEO

 Annual election of directors

Non-GAAPmeasures are includedMajority voting for directors and director resignation policy in uncontested elections

 Comprehensive annual individual evaluations of one-third of the directors

 Regular executive sessions of independent directors

 Robust succession planning

 In 2019, achieved removal of all remaining supermajority voting provisions in our charter

 In February 2020, reduced ownership threshold required to call a special meeting of shareholders to 15% from 25%

 Proxy access right at the end3%/3 years/2 or 20% of this proxy statement.Board/20 shareholder aggregation allowance

 Strong share retention guidelines for directors and executive officers

 Executive compensation driven by pay-for-performance philosophy

 Executive officers not permitted to hedge or pledge company shares

Shareholder Engagement

We encourage feedback from shareholders and have a strong history of engaging with investors on a range of topics, including our executive compensation program, evolving trends and best practices. In 2021, we continued our focus on regularly engaging with shareholders. We reached out to holders of approximately 60% of our shares outstanding, and engaged with governance professionals and/or portfolio managers at investors holding approximately 31% of our shares outstanding. During these discussions, we discussed many key topics, including our commitment to diversity and inclusion, progress on our ESG program and disclosures, our executive compensation program, and our corporate governance practices. Investors continued to express broad support for our governance structures and executive compensation program, including the changes implemented in 2020 in response to shareholder feedback, and shared their views on matters related to diversity and inclusion and our independent, well-qualified Board. Further, investors highlighted the importance of continuing our ongoing engagement with them in the future on long-term corporate strategy and ESG initiatives. For more detailed information regarding these discussions, please see “Shareholder Engagement and History of Board Responsiveness” on page 31.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 7


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Executive Compensation

Our compensation program for executive officers is designed to emphasize performance-based compensation in alignment with our business strategy.

2021 Executive Compensation

The following table summarizes pay mix for our CEO and other NEOs, which is highly performance-based.

LOGO

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

 Pay-for-performance philosophy — a substantial majority of NEO pay is performance-based and tied to Dover’s stock price performance

 Significant portion of long-term compensation is performance-based, with long-term incentives vesting over three years subject to rigorous three-year performance period

 Strong share ownership guidelines for NEOs

 Equity awards with anti-hedging and anti-pledging provisions

 Investors provided with clear disclosure regarding the individual strategic objectives and financial metrics in our Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”)

 ESG oversight incorporated into our CEO’s individual strategic objectives in the AIP

 Robust clawback structure

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 8


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Director Nominees

Our Governance and Nominating Committee maintains an active and engaged Board through a robust refreshment process, which focuses on ensuring our Board has a diverse skill set that benefits from both the industry- and company-specific knowledge of our longer-tenured directors, as well as the fresh perspectives brought by our newer directors.

    

Apergy

Spin-off

Complete

•   On May 9, 2018, wecompleted thetax-freespin-off of Apergy Corporation (“Apergy”), which was comprised of the upstream energy businesses previously included in our former Energy segment. The separation concluded ourBoard’s strategic review of our upstream energy businesses announced in September 2017, and was theculmination of a comprehensive process to determine the best separation alternatives to maximize shareholder value.

•   Following thespin-off, our remaining portfolio is well-positioned forlong-term sustainable growth and returns withless cyclicality.

Capital Return Program

•   We continued our history of providing regular capital returns to shareholders. We increased our quarterly dividend by 2%, marking our63rd consecutive year of dividend increases. We have thethird longest record of consecutive annual dividend increases of all listed companies, as reported by Mergent’s Dividend Achievers.

•   Wecompleted the $1 billion of share repurchases announced in November 2017, primarily funded with proceeds received from Apergy in connection with the consummation of thespin-off.

Rightsizing & Footprint Consolidation

•   We pursued several programs in order to further optimize our operations, including (1) rightsizing to align our cost structure in preparation for the Apergy separation, (2) broad-based selling, general and administrative expense reductions, and (3) initiation offootprint consolidation actions.

Other Portfolio & Strategic Actions

•   We made a total oftwo acquisitions for an aggregate consideration of $68.6 million, net of cash acquired, including the acquisition ofEttlinger, a leading manufacturer of filtering solutions for the plastics recycling industry, which enhances our ability to serve the Process Solutions end market within our Fluids segment.

•   We opened ournew Digital Labs center in the greater Boston area which will serve as thehub for our digital strategy and platform, and also serve as anR&D Center for our Marking & Coding business.

Investment in Sustainable Businesses

•   Over the past several years, we have accelerated our efforts and processes aroundinnovation, focusing ontechnologies which both createtangible value for our customers and enhance thesustainable nature of our products.

LOGO

LOGO

Ø Passive Cooling Unit utilizes existing underground energy

Ø 14 Series fueling nozzle family prevents dripping of excess fuel

  
   NAMEOCCUPATIONINDEPENDENT

COMMITTEES

MEMBERSHIPS*

OTHER PUBLIC  

COMPANY

BOARDS

LOGO

Deborah L. DeHaas

Age: 62

Director Since: 2021

CEO of the Corporate Leadership Center; Former Vice Chairman of Deloitte and Managing Partner of the Center for Board EffectivenessA1

LOGO

H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

Age: 65

Director Since: 2018

Retired Managing Director at Goldman SachsA, F1

LOGO

Kristiane C. Graham

Age: 64

Director Since: 1999

Private InvestorC, G0

LOGO

Michael F. Johnston

Chair of the Board

Age: 74

Director Since: 2013

Retired CEO of Visteon CorporationC, G1

LOGO

Eric A. Spiegel

Age: 64

Director Since: 2017

Former President and CEO of Siemens USA; Special Advisor at Brighton Park CapitalA, F (Chair)1

LOGO

Richard J. Tobin

Age: 58

Director Since: 2016

President and CEO of DoverNo

(CEO of Dover)

1

LOGO

Stephen M. Todd

Age: 73

Director Since: 2010

Former Global Vice Chairman of Assurance Professional Practice of Ernst & Young Global LimitedA (Chair)1

LOGO

Stephen K. Wagner

Age: 74

Director Since: 2010

Former Senior Adviser, Center for Corporate Governance, Deloitte & Touche LLPA, G (Chair)1

LOGO

Keith E. Wandell

Age: 72

Director Since: 2015

Former President and CEO of Harley-Davidson, Inc.C (Chair), F1

LOGO

Mary A. Winston

Age: 60

Director Since: 2005

President of WinsCo Enterprises Inc.; Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

C, F3

*A = Audit Committee; C = Compensation Committee; G = Governance and Nominating Committee; F = Finance Committee

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 9


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Board Composition

Our Board has the following composition:

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 10


Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

Criteria for Director Nominees

The Board seeks to recommend qualified director nominees who, in the opinion of the Board, demonstrate the highest personal and professional integrity as well as exceptional ability and judgment, who can serve as a sounding board for our CEO on planning and policy, and who will be most effective, together with the other nominees to the Board, in collectively serving the long-term interests of all our shareholders.

Key areas of expertise for director nominees, which are reflected in our current director nominees, include:

 Strategic M&A

Experience with international acquisitions, post-merger integration, and portfolio restructuring

  
 

 Global Operations & Management

 

Experience with cross-border transactions, global market entry and expansion, and implementation of operational efficiency

Continued Focus on Cash Flow Capital Markets
Expertise

Experience with capital markets and complex financing transactions

 Strategy Development
& Execution

Experience with diversified manufacturing in many of the markets and product areas relevant to Dover’s businesses

 Risk Management Expertise

Experience evaluating risk management policies and procedures

 Audit & Corporate Governance Matters

Experience with assurance and audit, regulation, and financial reporting

 Human Capital Management

Experience attracting, developing and retaining talent and building strong cultures

 Sustainability

Experience creating long-term value by embracing opportunities and managing risks deriving from ESG developments

 Executive Leadership Experience

Leadership experience as former CEOs and CFOs of global public companies

Diversity. In considering diversity in selecting director nominees, the Governance and Nominating Committee gives weight to the extent to which candidates would increase the effectiveness of the Board by broadening the mix of experience, knowledge, backgrounds, skills, ages, and tenures represented among its members. In 2020, our Board adopted a policy reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines requiring that the initial list of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity. Our Board believes that diverse perspectives enhance its decision-making and contribute to the success of Dover.

Skills Aligned with Dover’s Strategy. The Governance and Nominating Committee also considers our current Board composition and the projected retirement date of current directors, as well as such other factors it may deem to be in the best interests of Dover and its shareholders, including a director nominee’s leadership and operating experience (particularly as a CEO), financial and investment expertise, and strategic planning experience. We believe that our current director nominees possess the right mix of skills and backgrounds to enable us to achieve our strategic goals.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 11


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Independence & Depth of Experience. The Board prefers nominees to be independent but believes it is desirable to have our CEO on the Board as a representative of current management. Given the global reach and broad array of the types of businesses operated by Dover, the Governance and Nominating Committee highly values director nominees with multi-industry and multi-geographic experience.

Director Nomination Process

Whenever the Governance and Nominating Committee concludes that a new nominee to our Board is required or advisable, it will consider recommendations from directors, management, shareholders and, if it deems appropriate, consultants retained for that purpose. In such circumstances, it will evaluate individuals recommended by shareholders in the same manner as nominees recommended from other sources.

Shareholder Nominations for Director

Shareholders who wish to recommend an individual for nomination should send that person’s name and supporting information to the Governance and Nominating Committee, in care of the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 3005 Highland Parkway, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60515, or through our communications coordinator. Shareholders who wish to directly nominate an individual for election as a director, without going through the Governance and Nominating Committee, must comply with the procedures in our by-laws. Please see “General Information About the Annual Meeting” for nomination deadlines.

Proxy Access Shareholder Right

Following extensive engagement with our shareholders, our Board determined to adopt proxy access in February 2016, permitting a shareholder or group of up to 20 shareholders holding 3% of our outstanding shares of common stock for at least three years to nominate a number of directors constituting the greater of two directors or 20% of the number of directors on our Board, as set forth in detail in our by-laws.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 12


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

2022 Director Nominees

There are ten nominees for election to our Board at this Annual Meeting, each to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or his or her earlier removal, resignation or retirement. All of the nominees currently serve on our Board and are being proposed for re-election by our Board.

If any nominee for election becomes unavailable or unwilling to serve as a director before the Annual Meeting, an event which we do not anticipate, the persons named as proxies will vote for a substitute nominee or nominees as may be designated by our Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors. Directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast in connection with their election.

  LOGO

    

•   Our businessesgenerate annual free cash flow of approximately8-12% of revenueDeborah L. DeHaas. We are focused on the most efficient allocation of our capital to maximize returns on investment. To do this, we prioritize organic reinvestment to grow and strengthen our existing businesses withaverage annual investments in capital spending of approximately 2% to 4% of revenue with a focus on internal projects to expand markets, develop products, and improve productivity.

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2021

Age: 62

Committees:   Audit

Skills and Qualifications:

Significant leadership, financial and corporate governance expertise garnered from her nearly 40 years of experience at major audit, assurance and consulting firms


Certified public accountant (“CPA”) and has extensive experience with financial, accounting, internal controls, and enterprise risk management


Has deep expertise on governance, both as a topic and discipline, developed during her career at Deloitte

As a member of the Value Reporting Foundation Board (formerly the SASB Foundation Board), contributes valuable and well-informed insights on a variety of ESG matters

Brings relevant public company board service, serving on the board of CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Brings experience and perspective on matters regarding human capital and culture, including diversity and inclusion

Holds a bachelor’s degree in management science and accounting from Duke University

Included in the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) Directorship 100 from 2015-2020, recognizing influential leaders in corporate governance and is also an NACD Board Leadership Fellow

Business Experience:

CEO of the Corporate Leadership Center, a non-profit leadership development forum

Former Vice Chairman and National Managing Partner of the Center for Board Effectiveness at Deloitte

Former member of the U.S. Executive Committee

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Inclusion Officer

Former member of the U.S. Board of Directors

Former Vice Chairman and Central Region Managing Partner

Former Vice Chairman and Midwest Regional Managing Partner

Former Regional Managing Partner, Strategic Clients

Former positions of increasing responsibility at Arthur Andersen, an audit, financial advisory, tax and consulting firm, most recently as Managing Partner & Business Advisory Assurance, Central Region

Other Board Experience:

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 413


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYPROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 


  LOGO

H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2018

Age: 65

Committees:   Audit, Finance

Skills and Qualifications:

 

CEO Succession

On May 1, 2018, Richard J. Tobin became our new President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) following Robert A. Livingston’s retirement. Mr. Tobin continues to serve on our Board, which he joined in August 2016. Mr. Livingston resigned as a director concurrent with his retirement. Michael F. Johnston, as independent Chair of the Board, provided continuity of oversight of management through the transition.

Mr. Tobin’s appointment is the result of our Board’s active engagement in a thoughtful and comprehensive succession planning process led by our independent Chair and the independent Chair of our Governance and Nominating Committee, who identified talented external leaders and worked with our former CEO to evaluate and develop internal candidates. Ultimately, our Board determined that Mr. Tobin’s extensive experience as a public company CEO leading complex global industrial businesses and his expertise in finance and technology made him the best candidate to lead Dover. Our Board was impressed with Mr. Tobin’s contributions as a director and is confident that he is the right leader to guide us through the next phase of our evolution.

Immediately after starting as President and CEO, Mr. Tobin performed anin-depth study of our businesses, makingon-site visits, conducting management team reviews, and analyzing the three-year strategic plans for each of our operating companies. As an outgrowth of this review, he identified and began executing on strategic priorities designed to position us to realize our earnings and growth potential, including near-term initiatives to improve our margins through cost rightsizing and footprint consolidation. Mr. Tobin also has articulated our Board’s capital allocation priorities and developed a disciplined framework for portfolio enhancement and a balanced operating model for Dover. He has committed to report to shareholders in 2019 on our progress on operational improvements and capital allocation priorities as well as to present a holistic view on portfolio strategy, growth drivers, and areas for reinvestment and to articulate longer term strategic goals for the next evolution of Dover.

Board Refreshment

Our Board welcomed H. John Gilbertson, Jr. as a director in August 2018. As a former Managing Director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (“Goldman Sachs”), Mr. Gilbertson has extensiveExtensive experience in corporate finance, capital markets, and mergers and acquisitions. The insights he gainedacquisitions

Served as ana strategic and financial advisor to his clients, acrossforming deep relationships with companies in a broad range of industries will bring valuable perspective

Has nearly four decades of experience in the professional and financial services industry

Deep expertise in financial management, coupled with his analytical and collaborative mindset, allows him to make invaluable contributions to our Board. Mr. Gilbertson serves on ourBoard

Strong background in senior leadership development, succession planning, and organizational culture development

Brings to the Board considerable expertise in financial risk oversight and capital allocation

Bachelor’s degree in political economy from Dartmouth College and an MBA from Harvard University

Business Experience:

Retired Managing Director at Goldman Sachs

Served as Advisory Director and Partner-in-Charge, Midwest Region Investment Banking Services

Served as Managing Director at Travelers Group Inc.

Former Associate, Mergers and Acquisitions at Morgan Stanley

Former Consultant, Corporate Strategy at Bain & Company

Former Assistant Treasurer, Corporate Banking at Chase Manhattan Bank

Former News Reporter at The Providence Journal Company

Other Board Experience:

Director and Chair of Audit Committee and Finance Committee.

Current directors Peter T. Francis and Richard K. Lochridge are not standing forre-election and will retire from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting. Mr. Francis has been a director since 2007, and Mr. Lochridge has been a director since 1999. The Board expresses its deep gratitude to eachMeijer, Inc. (“Meijer”)

Director of Messrs. Francis and Lochridge for their guidance and significant contributions to Dover during their years of dedicated service on the Board.

New Finance Committee

The Board established a new Finance Committee comprised of independent directors in 2018. The Finance Committee assists the Board in overseeing policies, practices, strategies, and risks relating to our financial affairs, including with respect to capital allocation matters such as share repurchases, dividend policy, capital expenditures and M&A, as well as global treasury activities, insured risk management, and tax planning.

Shareholder Engagement

In 2018, we continued our focus on regularly engaging with our shareholders. We reached out to holders of over 51% of our shares outstanding, and engaged with governance professionals and/or portfolio managers at investors holding 32% of our shares outstanding. During these discussions, we discussed many topics, including our recent CEO transition, executive compensation program, and Board refreshment practices. Investors continued to express broad support for our governance structures and shared their views on matters related to shareholder rights and ourAAR Corp.



 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 514


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYPROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 


  LOGO

Kristiane C. Graham

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 1999

Age: 64

Committees:   Compensation, Governance and Nominating

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Experience as a private investor with substantial holdings of Dover stock and her shared interests in Dover, including interests through charitable organizations of which she is a director, makes her a good surrogate for our individual and retail investors

Experience with a commercial bank, primarily as a loan officer; founded and operated an advisory company and a publication regarding international thoroughbred racing and now co-manages her family’s investments

Actively works with and has served on the boards of various organizations to support the objectives of local communities, affordable housing, education, and health

Currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Walter N. Ridley Scholarship Fund at the University of Virginia

Serves as an Emeritus Trustee of the College Foundation of the University of Virginia and has previously served on the Advisory Board of the University of Virginia School of Nursing

Brings valuable insights on the development of our policies and strategies relating to talent, leadership, and culture, with a focus on diversity and inclusion

Devoted substantial time to monitoring the development of Dover operating company leaders, enabling her to provide the Board valuable insights regarding management succession

As a member of one of the founding families of Dover, Ms. Graham also brings to the Board a sense of Dover’s historical values, culture and strategic vision which the Board believes is beneficial as it considers various strategic planning alternatives for shaping Dover’s future

Business Experience:

Private Investor

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 15


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Michael F. Johnston

Independent Board Chair; Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2013

Age: 74

Committees:   Compensation, Governance and Nominating

Skills and Qualifications:

Brings industry insight, financial expertise and leadership experience garnered from his 17 years on the boards of global companies

Served as CEO of an $18 billion global manufacturer

Mr. Johnston also brings valuable corporate governance perspectives from his prior board service, including as a lead Director and Chair of other major public companies

Brings deep operations experience has helped him gain knowledge and a deep understanding in manufacturing, design, innovation, engineering, accounting and finance and capital structure

Brings nearly two decades of experience in building businesses in emerging economies

Bachelor’s degree in industrial management from the University of Massachusetts and an MBA from Michigan State University

Business Experience:

Former CEO and President of Visteon Corporation (“Visteon”)

Former Chief Operating Officer of Visteon

Former President of North America/Asia Pacific, Automotive Systems Group, of Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Johnson Controls”)

Former President of Americas Automotive Group of Johnson Controls

Other Board Experience:

Director of Armstrong Flooring, Inc.

Former Chairman and Director of Visteon

Former Director of Armstrong World Industries, Flowserve Corporation, and Whirlpool Corporation

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 16


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Eric A. Spiegel

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2017

Age: 64

Committees:   Audit, Finance (Chair)

Skills and Qualifications:

Experienced business leader with diversified, global experience who brings deep and valuable expertise in strategy development, corporate restructuring, portfolio management and M&A to our Board

40+ years of experience working with large, global companies in the energy and industrial markets, mostly recently as President & CEO of Siemens USA

At Siemens, he led strategic reviews across a portfolio of ~45 businesses in the company’s largest market with over $22 billion in revenue, 50,000 employees and over 60 manufacturing facilities

Led the acquisition, divestiture, joint venture and carve-out of over 30 business units and segments

Executed Siemens’ “Vision 2020” initiative to optimize growth and margins in the U.S., across all sectors

Prior to Siemens, Mr. Spiegel was a global consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton focused on complex organizations in the energy, power, chemical, water, industrial and automotive fields

At Booz, he worked with major energy clients globally on projects around corporate strategy, M&A, major capital projects, cost restructuring, margin enhancement and supply chain re-design and was also closely involved with the government sector

An expert on the global energy industry, Mr. Spiegel co-authored the book Energy Shift: Game-changing Options for Fueling the Future

Holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Harvard University and an MBA from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College

Business Experience:

Special Advisor at Brighton Park Capital, a private equity firm, where he supports the firm’s sector investment teams and portfolio companies by providing strategic counsel on industry trends and growth strategies

Former President and CEO of Siemens USA

Former Managing Partner, Global Energy, Chemicals, and Power, and Managing Partner, Washington, D.C. office, and other roles at Booz & Company, Inc. (now known as Strategy&) and Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., global consulting firms

Former Associate, Energy and Industrials Practice, at Temple, Barker & Sloane, Inc. (now known as Oliver Wyman)

Former Marketing and Strategy Manager at Brown Boveri & Cie (now known as ABB), a Swiss group of electrical engineering companies

In connection with his position at Brighton Park Capital, Mr. Spiegel serves as Chair of Relatient, Inc.

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee Chair of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc.

Director and Audit Committee Chair of Project Energy Reimagined Acquisition Corp.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 17


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Richard J. Tobin

Chief Executive Officer

Director since: 2016

Age: 58

Committees:   None

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Tobin is Dover’s current CEO. The Board believes it is desirable to have one active management representative on the Board to facilitate its access to timely and relevant information and its oversight of management’s long-term strategy, planning, and performance

Has a broad range of industry and functional experiences acquired through regional and global leadership positions

Former CEO of CNH Industrial, a complex international industrial company, where he led efforts to increase efficiencies, innovate through new technologies, expand geographically, and maximize the company’s portfolio of businesses

Gained extensive experience in international finance, operations, management, and information technology in his prior roles

Developed deep expertise with global capital markets through his international finance leadership roles

Prior to beginning his business career, Mr. Tobin was an officer in the United States Army

Member of the Board of Trustees of the John G. Shedd Aquarium in Chicago

Formerly served on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, and is a former member of the Business Roundtable

Holds a bachelor of arts from Norwich University and an MBA from Drexel University

Business Experience:

President and CEO of Dover

Former CEO of CNH Industrial NV (“CNH Industrial”)

Former Group Chief Operating Officer of Fiat Industrial S.p.A

Former President and CEO of CNH Global NV

Former CFO of CNH Global NV

Former Chief Finance Officer & Head of Information Technology of SGS Group

Former Chief Operating Officer for North America of SGS Group

Other Board Experience:

Director of KeyCorp.

Former director of CNH Industrial

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 18


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Stephen M. Todd

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2010

Age: 73

Committees:   Audit (Chair)

Skills and Qualifications:

Extensive accounting and financial experience in both domestic and international business developed during a four decade career at Ernst & Young where he specialized in assurance and audit

Brings unique insights into accounting and financial issues relevant to multinational companies like Dover

Brings the perspective of an outside auditor to the Audit Committee

Brings leadership and financial strategy experience as developer and director of Ernst & Young’s Global Capital Markets Centers, which provides accounting, regulatory, internal control and financial reporting services to multinational companies in connection with cross-border debt and equity securities transactions and acquisitions

Business Experience:

Former Global Vice of Assurance Professional Practice of Ernst & Young Global Limited, London, UK; and prior thereto, various positions with Ernst & Young

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee member of ChampionX Corporation (formerly known as Apergy Corporation)

Former member of the Board of Trustees of PNC Funds

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 19


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Stephen K. Wagner

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2010

Age: 74

Committees:   Audit, Governance and Nominating (Chair)

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Wagner’s over 30 years of experience in accounting make him a valuable resource for the Board and the Audit Committee

His work with Sarbanes-Oxley and other corporate governance regulations, including his years as Managing Partner at Deloitte & Touche’s Center for Corporate Governance, makes him well suited to advise the Board on financial, auditing and finance-related corporate governance matters as well as risk management

Expert in risk oversight and co-authored a book on risk management entitled Surviving and Thriving in Uncertainty: Creating the Risk Intelligent Enterprise

Brings to the Board an outside auditor’s perspective on matters involving audit committee procedures, internal control and accounting and financial reporting matters

Business Experience:

Former Senior Advisor, Center for Corporate Governance, of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”)

Former Managing Partner, Center for Corporate Governance of Deloitte

Former Deputy Managing Partner, Innovation, Audit and Enterprise Risk, United States of Deloitte

Former Co-Leader, Sarbanes-Oxley Services, of Deloitte

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee member of ChampionX Corporation (formerly known as Apergy Corporation)

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 20


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Keith E. Wandell

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2015

Age: 72

Committees:   Compensation (Chair), Finance

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Wandell brings to the Board the valuable perspective of a strategic, experienced leader with a strong record focused on growth, profitability, international expansion and innovation.

Has over 30 years of experience in diversified manufacturing businesses, most recently as the former Chairman and CEO of Harley-Davidson, Inc. (“Harley-Davidson”) where he led transformation efforts across the company’s product development, manufacturing and retail functions, focused on international expansion and implemented a restructuring plan

Prior to joining Harley-Davidson, Mr. Wandell served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Johnson Controls”) and helped manage the company’s entry into the Chinese car-battery market as well as its subsequent joint venture with China’s largest battery manufacturer

Gained valuable insights into the effective development of executive leadership capabilities and strong corporate cultures through his experience as a senior leader at various companies

Served on the boards of four other public companies, including the two on which he currently serves

Holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Ohio University and an MBA from the University of Dayton

Business Experience:

Former President and CEO of Harley-Davidson

Former President and Chief Operating Officer of Johnson Controls

Former Executive Vice President of Johnson Controls

Former Corporate Vice President of Johnson Controls

Former President of the Automotive Experience business of Johnson Controls

Former President of the Power Solutions business of Johnson Controls

Other Board Experience:

Director of Dana Incorporated. Former Chairman of Harley-Davidson

Former Director of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Clarcor, Inc.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 21


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Mary A. Winston

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2005

Age: 60

Committees: Compensation, Finance

Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Winston brings to the Board valuable experience and expertise based on her years of broad financial management and broad executive leadership experience.

Started her career as a CPA with Arthur Andersen & Co, and has extensive experience with financial, accounting and internal control matters for large public companies.

Served as CFO of three large companies: Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Giant Eagle, Inc. and Scholastic, Inc., as well as prior global finance leadership roles (prior to 2004) at Visteon Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.

Developed deep expertise in capital markets, M&A, capital structure matters, capital allocation, financial risk management, real estate financing transactions, dividend and stock repurchase programs, and investor relations

Ms. Winston’s background and experience make her a valuable contributor to the Board on matters involving risk oversight and capital allocation, as well as executive compensation and general corporate governance matters

Holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Wisconsin and an MBA from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management

Designated as a Board Leadership Fellow by the NACD and serves on the national board of the NACD

Business Experience:

President of WinsCo Enterprises Inc

Former Interim CEO, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.

Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

Former Senior Vice President and CFO of Giant Eagle, Inc.

Former President of WinsCo Financial LLC

Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Scholastic Corporation

Other Board Experience:

Director of Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Chipotle Mexican Grill, and Acuity Brands, Inc.

Former Director of Domtar Corporation, SUPERVALU INC., and Plexus Corporation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH

OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 22


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Oversight and Governance Practices

Our Board is responsible for, and committed to, overseeing our long-term strategic development as well as managing the principal and most significant risks that we face. In carrying out this duty, our Board advises senior management to help drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. The Board delegates specific areas of responsibility to relevant Board committees, as detailed below under the heading “Overview of Committee Responsibilities”, who report on their deliberations to the Board. The following summarizes our Board’s key areas of oversight responsibility.

Board Oversight

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

Long-Term

Business Strategy

•   One of the primary responsibilities of our Board is the oversight of management’s long-term strategy and planning. Accordingly, our Board maintains a deep level of engagement with management in setting and overseeing Dover’s long-term business strategy.

Capital Allocation

•   Our Board is focused on the efficient allocation of capital to drive growth and provide returns to our shareholders. Our capital allocation priorities are organic investments, strategic acquisitions, and the return of capital to our shareholders.

•   We consistently return cash to shareholders by paying dividends, which have increased annually over each of the last 66 years.

•   We also undertake opportunistic share repurchases as part of our capital allocation strategy, completing $21.6 million of share repurchases in 2021 and $106.3 million in 2020.

•   We made $171.5 million in capital expenditures in 2021, representing 2.2% of revenue, and $165.7 million in capital expenditures in 2020, representing 2.5% of revenue, in line with our priority of organic reinvestment to grow and strengthen our existing businesses.

•   We employ a prudent financial policy to support our capital allocation strategy, which includes maintaining an investment grade credit rating.

Portfolio

Management

•   Businesses in our portfolio are continually evaluated for strategic fit.

•   We seek to deploy capital in acquisitions in attractive growth areas across our five segments. We focus primarily on bolt-on acquisitions, applying strict selection criteria of market attractiveness (including growth, market landscape, and performance-based competition), business fit (including sustained leading position, revenue visibility, and favorable customer value-add versus switching cost or risk) and financial return profile (accretive growth and margins and double-digit return on invested capital).

•   We have sold or divested some of our businesses based on changes in specific market outlook, structural changes in financial performance, value-creation potential, or for other strategic considerations, which included an effort to reduce our exposure to cyclical markets or focus on our higher margin growth spaces.

•   In recognition of recent portfolio changes, we recently changed the name of the Fueling Solutions segment to “Clean Energy & Fueling,” and the Refrigeration & Food Equipment segment to “Climate & Sustainability Technologies” to better reflect the markets and customers served by the businesses within these segments.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 23


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

Risk
Management

•   Our Board has established a comprehensive enterprise risk management process to identify and manage risks, and periodically reviews the processes established by management to identify and manage risks and communicates with management about these processes.

•   We have established a risk assessment team consisting of senior executives, which annually, with the assistance of a consultant, oversees a risk assessment made at the corporate center, segment and operating company levels and, with that information in mind, performs an assessment of the overall risks our company may face and reports to the Board on that assessment. Each quarter, this team reassesses the risks, the severity of these risks, and the status of efforts to mitigate them.

ESG

•   The full Board has oversight of ESG matters and is regularly briefed on strategic planning, risks, and opportunities related to ESG by senior management, including our CEO.

•   Our Compensation Committee has integrated ESG oversight responsibility into our CEO’s individual strategic objectives within the AIP.

Culture & Human
Capital
Management

•   Our entrepreneurial culture depends upon an inclusive approach that values employees’ diversity and contributions.

•   We foster an operating culture with high ethical standards that values accountability, rigor, trust, inclusion, respect, and open communication and is designed to encourage individual growth and operational effectiveness. We continue to make significant investments in talent development, including in the areas of digital applications and operational management, and recognize that the growth and development of our employees is essential for our continued success.

•   As part of our commitment to strong corporate governance practices, we maintain an active and robust ethics program. Our Code of Business Conduct & Ethics (“Code of Conduct”) applies to all employees and directors of Dover and its subsidiaries. We enforce our Code of Conduct fairly and consistently, regardless of one’s position in Dover, and will not tolerate retaliation against those who report suspected misconduct in good faith.

Succession
Planning

•   Another of the Board’s primary responsibilities is overseeing a sound Board and management succession process. The Board has developed a comprehensive plan to address management succession — both over the long term and for emergency purposes. The framework for the long-term plan includes thoughtful, deliberate monitoring of management beyond our top executives to ensure Dover continues to build a deep internal bench of talent.

•   Our Board is also focused on its own succession plan, which drives not only our director selection efforts, but also how we approach Board and committee leadership structure and membership, with a focus on critical board skills, diversity, and independence.

Cybersecurity

•   The full Board is briefed on enterprise-wide cybersecurity risk management and the overall cybersecurity risk environment, and oversees major tasks related to cybersecurity risk management, periodically reviews our response capabilities, and meets with the Chief Information Security Officer on at least an annual basis.

•   Dover employs the National Institute of Standards & Technology Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (The NIST Framework). This voluntary guidance developed with much private sector input provides a framework and a toolkit for organizations to manage cybersecurity risk.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 24


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Committees

Our Board has four standing committees — the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Finance Committee. The table below sets forth a summary of our committee structure and membership information.

     

 DIRECTOR

  Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Governance

and

Nominating
Committee

 Finance

Committee

 DEBORAH L. DEHAAS

     

 H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR.

  

   

 KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM

   

 

 

 MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON

     

 ERIC A. SPIEGEL

      (Chair)

 RICHARD J. TOBIN

     

 STEPHEN M. TODD

  

 (Chair)

   

 STEPHEN K. WAGNER

     (Chair) 

 KEITH E. WANDELL

   

 (Chair)

  

 MARY A. WINSTON

   

  

 MEETINGS HELD IN 2021

  8 

5

 4 

9

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 25


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Overview of Committee Responsibilities

Audit Committee

    Stephen M. Todd (Chair)    

    Deborah L. DeHaas

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Eric A. Spiegel

    Stephen K. Wagner

Key Responsibilities

•  Selecting and engaging our independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditors”)

•  Overseeing the work of our independent auditors and our internal audit function

•  Approving in advance all services to be provided by, and all fees to be paid to, our independent auditors, who report directly to the committee

•  Reviewing with management and the independent auditors the audit plan and results of the auditing engagement

•  Reviewing with management and our independent auditors the quality and adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting

The Audit Committee holds regular quarterly meetings at which it meets separately with each of our independent registered public accounting firm, PwC, our internal audit function, financial management and our general counsel to assess certain matters including the status of the independent audit process, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the operation and effectiveness of our compliance program. In addition, the Audit Committee, as a whole, reviews and meets to discuss the contents of each Form 10-Q and Form 10-K (including the financial statements) prior to its filing with the SEC.

Our Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the SEC rules.

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

Compensation Committee

    Keith E. Wandell (Chair)     

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

The Compensation Committee, together with our independent directors, approves compensation for the CEO of Dover. The functions of the Compensation Committee also include:

•  Approving compensation for executive officers who report directly to the CEO (together with the CEO, “senior executive officers”)

•  Granting awards and approving payouts under our 2012 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2012 LTIP”), our 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2021 LTIP”). and our AIP

•  Approving changes to our executive compensation plans

•  Reviewing and recommending compensation for the Board

•  Overseeing succession planning and management development programs

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 26


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Governance and Nominating Committee

    Stephen K. Wagner (Chair)

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

Key Responsibilities

•  Developing and recommending corporate governance principles to our Board

•  Annually reviewing the requisite skills and characteristics of board members as well as the size, composition, functioning and needs of our Board as a whole

•  Considering and recommending to the Board nominees for election to, or for filling any vacancy on, our Board in accordance with our by-laws, our governance guidelines, and the committee’s charter

•  Identifying and recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in the size and composition of our Board

•  Recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in structure and membership of our Board’s committees

•  Providing oversight of Dover’s practices on political contributions and lobbying expenses and reviewing annually Dover’s political contributions and lobbying expenses

The Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

Finance Committee

    Eric A. Spiegel (Chair)       

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Keith E. Wandell

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

•  Reviewing and recommending for approval by the Board proposed changes to dividend policies, stock splits, and repurchase programs

•  Reviewing our capital structure, liquidity, and financing plans

•  Reviewing and approving the registration and issuance of debt or equity securities

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, capital expenditures

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, M&A transactions

•  Oversight of treasury, insurance, and tax planning matters

The Finance Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 27


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Corporate Governance

Our Board is committed to sound governance practices and regularly reviews and refines our profile to reflect evolving best practices and matters raised by our shareholders. The following summarizes key aspects of our governance framework.

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Independent

Board of Directors

• All directors are independent, other than our CEO, and our Board has leadership that is independent from management, by way of an independent Chair.

Commitment to Diversity

• In 2020, our Board adopted a policy reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines requiring that the initial list of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity.

Special
Shareholder
Meetings

• In 2020, we amended our by-laws to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting of shareholders to 15% or more of the voting power of our outstanding stock from 25%.

Elimination of
Super-majority Provisions

• All of the supermajority voting provisions in our charter were eliminated in 2019.

Board Committee Refreshment

• Our Board periodically reviews committee composition and chair positions, seeking the appropriate blend of continuity and fresh perspectives on committees.

Annual Majority
Vote Director
Elections &
Mandatory
Resignation Policy

• All of our directors are elected annually by our shareholders.

• Our directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections to be elected.

• We have a director resignation policy that requires a director to tender an irrevocable resignation letter to the Board prior to being nominated, contingent on the director not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. The Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the full Board whether to accept the resignation or whether to take other action.

Proxy Access

• Our by-laws permit a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our by-laws.

Board Leadership Structure

We believe that having an independent well-qualifiedleader of the Board is important to the Board’s oversight role and decision-making involving corporate strategy, performance, succession, and other critical matters. Under our current Board leadership structure, our Board has leadership that is independent from management by way of an independent Chair. Our CEO is also a member of the Board as a management representative. We believe this is important to make information and insight directly available to the directors in their deliberations. In our view, this board leadership structure gives us an appropriate, well-functioning balance between non-management and management directors that combines experience, accountability and effective risk oversight.

Board, Committee and Individual Director Evaluations

Our Board and its committees conduct robust annual self-evaluations of their performance. In addition, our Board evaluates one-third of our directors on a rotating individual basis each year with the purpose of assisting each director to be a more effective member of the Board. Further, investors highlightedNew directors undergo the importanceevaluation process in each of their first two years on the Board. Our directors believe the rotational nature of our evaluation process enables a more in-depth, comprehensive evaluation for each of our directors.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 28


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Directors’ Meetings and Attendance

During 2021, the Board met seven times. No director attended less than 75% of the board and standing committee meetings held while he or she was a member of the Board and relevant standing committee. Average board attendance was over 97% in 2021. Our independent directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions at least quarterly without management representatives or non-independent directors present. The Chair of the Board presides at these sessions. We expect our directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.

Our directors also regularly engage with management and outside subject matter experts outside of formal meetings. Examples include developing agendas and reviewing the content of materials in advance of meetings, calls, or in-person meetings with members of management to prepare for meetings, receiving periodic updates from management on significant operational or strategic developments between meetings, and, from time to time, engaging with themshareholders.

Management Meetings and Site Visits

We encourage our directors to meet with senior managers throughout the enterprise and attend management’s strategic planning sessions. When considering businesses to visit, priority goes to those businesses identified as strategically important as well as those that were recently acquired. From time to time, the Board makes on-site visits to our businesses to tour the manufacturing facilities and meet face-to-face with company management and employees. These visits serve as an important tool in the futureBoard’s succession planning process for our senior leadership team and enable a deeper understanding of our businesses and our culture. In 2021, these types of opportunities for engagement were largely conducted virtually rather than in-person.

Director Orientation and Education

All new directors participate in our director orientation program. New directors meet with senior corporate leaders to review and discuss our businesses, operations, strategy, end markets, governance, internal controls, and culture. We believe that our on-boarding approach, coupled with participation in regular Board and committee meetings, as well as additional exposure to our business through participation in management meetings and site visits, whether virtually or in-person, provides new directors a strong foundation in our businesses and accelerates their effectiveness to fully engage in Board deliberations.

Our Board also encourages directors to participate annually in continuing director education programs outside of the Boardroom, and we reimburse directors for their expenses associated with this participation.

Director Independence

Our Board has determined that each of the current members of the Board, except for Richard J. Tobin, who is our CEO, has no material relationship with Dover and satisfies all the criteria for being “independent” members of our Board. This includes the criteria established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards, as well as our standards for classification as an independent director which are available on long-termour website at www.dovercorporation.com. Our Board makes an annual determination of the independence of each nominee for director prior to his or her nomination for re-election. No director may be deemed independent unless the Board determines that he or she has no material relationship with Dover, directly or as an officer, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a material relationship with Dover.

Majority Standard for Election of Directors and Mandatory Resignation Policy

Under our by-laws and corporate strategygovernance guidelines, the voting standard in director elections is a majority of the votes cast. Under this majority of the votes cast standard, a director must receive more votes in favor of his or her election than votes against his or her election. Abstentions and sustainability initiatives. broker non-votes do not count as votes cast with respect to a director’s election. In contested director elections (where there are more nominees than available seats on the board), the plurality standard will apply. Under the plurality standard, the nominees who receive the most “for” votes are elected to the Board until all seats are filled.

For more detailed informationan incumbent director to be nominated for re-election, he or she must submit an irrevocable resignation letter. The resignation will be contingent on the nominee not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and on the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. If an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 29


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

election, the Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to our Board concerning whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. Our Board will act on the resignation within 90 days following certification of the election results, taking into account the committee’s recommendation. The Board will publicly announce its decision and, if the resignation is rejected, the rationale for its decision.

Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics

Our Board long ago adopted written corporate governance guidelines that set forth the responsibilities of our Board and the qualifications and independence of its members and the members of its standing committees. The Board reviews these guidelines at least annually, in light of evolving best practices, shareholder feedback and the evolution of our business. In 2020, the Board amended the guidelines to require that initial lists of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity. In addition, our Board has a long-standing Code of Conduct setting forth standards applicable to all of our companies and their employees, a code of ethics for our CEO and senior financial officers, and charters for each of its standing committees. All of these documents (referred to collectively as “governance materials”) are available on our website at www.dovercorporation.com.

Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions

We generally do not engage in transactions in which our senior executive officers or directors, any of their immediate family members or any of our 5% shareholders have a material interest. Should a proposed transaction or series of similar transactions involve any such persons and an amount that exceeds $120,000, it would be subject to review and approval by the Governance and Nominating Committee in accordance with a written policy and the procedures adopted by our Board, which are available with the governance materials on our website.

Under the procedures, management determines whether a proposed transaction requires review under the policy and, if so, presents the transaction to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction and approves or rejects the transaction. If the proposed transaction is immaterial or it is impractical or undesirable to defer the proposed transaction until the next committee meeting, the Chair of the committee decides whether to (i) approve the transaction and report the transaction at the next meeting or (ii) call a special meeting of the committee to review and approve the transaction. Should the proposed transaction involve the CEO or enough members of the Governance and Nominating Committee to prevent a quorum, the disinterested members of the committee will review the transaction and make a recommendation to the Board, and the disinterested members of the Board will then approve or reject the transaction. No director may participate in the review of any transaction in which he or she is a related person.

Communication with Directors

The Audit Committee has established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters (“accounting matters”) and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting matters. Such complaints or concerns may be submitted to Dover, care of our Corporate Secretary or through the communications coordinator, an external service provider, by mail, fax, telephone, or via the internet as published on our website. The communications coordinator forwards such communications to Dover without disclosing the identity of the sender if anonymity is requested.

Shareholders and other interested persons may also communicate with our Board and the non-management directors in any of these discussions, please see “same manners. Such communications are forwarded to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 30


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Shareholder Engagement and History of Board Responsiveness

Shareholder EngagementNominations for Director”.

These discussions provide our Board with valuable insights into our shareholders’ views. In this proxy statement, we describe the feedback we received, and acted upon, regarding several matters, including our Board’s proposals to remove super-majority voting provisions from our charter. We plan to continue to actively engage with our shareholders on a regular basis to better understand and consider their views.

Management Proposals to Remove Super-Majority Voting Provisions

Proposals 4Shareholders who wish to recommend an individual for nomination should send that person’s name and 5 of this proxy statement request that shareholders approvesupporting information to the removalGovernance and Nominating Committee, in care of the remaining super-majority provisionsCorporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 3005 Highland Parkway, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60515, or through our communications coordinator. Shareholders who wish to directly nominate an individual for election as a director, without going through the Governance and Nominating Committee, must comply with the procedures in our charter. The super-majority voting provisions are limited to (1) amendments to Article 15 of our charter relating to certain share repurchases from “interested stockholders” (defined in our charter as a beneficial holder of 5% or more of our shares, unless heldby-laws. Please see “General Information About the Annual Meeting” for more than four years) at a per share price in excess of the applicable market price or the ability for shareholders to use cumulative voting in the election of directors once there is a “substantial stockholder” (defined in our charter as a beneficial holder of 40% or more of our shares) (Proposal 4), and (2) amendments to the provision of Article 16 of our charter that prohibits action by written consent of shareholders (Proposal 5). These provisions were originally designed to ensure that the interests of all shareholders were adequately represented in the event any of the actions contemplated by these provisions were to occur. However, the Board is aware that some shareholders oppose super-majority provisions, arguing that super-majority voting provisions may limit the ability of a majority of common shareholders to effect changes they desire.nomination deadlines.

Informed in part byProxy Access Shareholder Right

Following extensive engagement with our shareholders, we presented these proposals at our 2017 and 2018 Annual Meetings. The proposals were supported by holdersBoard determined to adopt proxy access in February 2016, permitting a shareholder or group of just over 79% of our outstanding common stock in both 2017 and 2018, a level of support below the required affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80%up to 20 shareholders holding 3% of our outstanding shares of common stock.

Following the 2018 meeting, we sought further shareholder input as our Board considered next steps regarding the remaining super-majority provisions. Shareholders expressed appreciationstock for our continued effortsat least three years to remove the provisions and acknowledged our continued responsiveness to shareholder feedback while facing the high hurdle presented by the current 80% voting requirement in our charter to approve amendments to remove the super-majority provisions. Given our proactive and continued efforts to remove the remaining super-majority provisions over the past several years,nominate a number of investors stated that they would have been supportive ifdirectors constituting the greater of two directors or 20% of the number of directors on our Board, did not present a management proposal to eliminate supermajority provisionsas set forth in 2018. However, several shareholders continued to express a preference for simple majority voting requirements and encouraged us to put forth another management proposal to remove the remaining super-majority voting provisionsdetail in our charter. Shareholder feedback was a factor in the Board’s decision to again present these two proposals at the 2019 Annual Meeting in order to continue evolving our governance practices to ensure we operate with abest-in-classby-laws. governance structure.



DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 6


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


Executive Compensation

Our compensation program for executive officers is designed to emphasize performance-based compensation in alignment with our business strategy.

New CEO Employment Agreement

In connection with Mr. Tobin’s appointment as President and CEO and to ensure a smooth executive transition, our independent directors, after considering market data, advice from our independent compensation consultant, and other factors, including Mr. Tobin’s position as a sitting CEO, approved Dover’s entry into a three-year employment agreement with Mr. Tobin. In order to offset forfeited compensation and pension benefit from his prior company, Mr. Tobin received aone-time award when he joined Dover, subject to termination and claw-back provisions, comprised of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and internal Total Shareholder Return (“iTSR”) performance share units and a make-whole cash payment.

We sought shareholder feedback on Mr. Tobin’s compensation arrangements after his appointment, including hisone-time award. Our shareholders indicated they were supportive of the structure because it ensured a smooth transition and the Board’s ability to hire a highly qualified candidate.

2018 Executive Compensation

The following table summarizes pay mix for our CEO and other NEOs, which is highly performance based.

LOGO

TARGET CEO PAY MIX TARGET OTHER NEO PAY MIX

Executive Compensation Program Highlights

Pay-for-performance philosophy — a substantial majority of NEO pay is performance based and tied to Dover’s stock price performance

Significant portion of long-term compensation is performance based, with long-term incentives vesting over three years subject to rigorous three-year performance period

Strong share ownership guidelines for NEOs

Equity awards with anti-hedging and anti-pledging provisions



DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 7


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


Director Nominees

Our Governance and Nominating Committee maintains an active and engaged Board through a robust refreshment process, which focuses on ensuring our Board has a diverse skill set that benefits from both the industry- and company-specific knowledge of our longer-tenured directors, as well as the fresh perspectives brought by our newer directors.

NAMEOCCUPATIONINDEPENDENT

COMMITTEES

MEMBERSHIPS*

OTHER PUBLIC  

COMPANY

BOARDS

LOGO

H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

Age: 62

Director Since: 2018

Retired Managing Director at Goldman SachsYesA, F0

LOGO

Kristiane C. Graham

Age: 61

Director Since: 1999

Private InvestorYesC, G0

LOGO

Michael F. Johnston

Chair of the Board

Age: 71

Director Since: 2013

Retired CEO of Visteon CorporationYesC, G2

LOGO

Eric A. Spiegel

Age: 61

Director Since: 2017

Former President and CEO of Siemens USA; Special Advisor at General AtlanticYesA, F (Chair)0

LOGO

Richard J. Tobin

Age: 55

Director Since: 2016

President and CEO of DoverNo

(CEO of Dover)

0

LOGO

Stephen M. Todd

Age: 70

Director Since: 2010

Former Global Vice Chairman of Assurance Professional Practice of Ernst & Young Global LimitedYesA (Chair)2

LOGO

Stephen K. Wagner

Age: 71

Director Since: 2010

Former Senior Adviser, Center for Corporate Governance, Deloitte & Touche LLPYesA, G (Chair)1

LOGO

Keith E. Wandell

Age: 69

Director Since: 2015

Former President and CEO of Harley-Davidson, Inc.YesC (Chair), F2

LOGO

Mary A. Winston

Age: 57

Director Since: 2005

President of WinsCo Enterprises Inc.; Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

YesC, F2

*A = Audit Committee; C = Compensation Committee; G = Governance and Nominating Committee; F = Finance Committee



DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 8


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


Board Composition

Upon the retirement of Messrs. Francis and Lochridge, the Board will have the following composition:

LOGO

Governance Highlights

Our Board is committed to sound governance practices designed to promote the long-term interests of shareholders and strengthen Board and management accountability. Highlights include:

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

•  Separate independent Chair and CEO roles

•  All directors are independent, other than CEO

•  Annual election of directors

•  Majority voting for directors and director resignation policy in uncontested elections

•  Comprehensive annual individual evaluations ofone-third of the directors

•  Regular executive sessions of independent directors

•  Robust succession planning

•   New Finance Committee established in 2018

•   Proxy access right at 3%/3 years/2 or 20% of Board/20 shareholder aggregation allowance

•   Strong share retention guidelines for directors and executive officers

•   Executive compensation driven bypay-for-performance philosophy

•   Executive officers not permitted to hedge or pledge company shares

•   Shareholder right to call special meetings at 25%

•   No super-majority vote required for business combinations

COMMITTEES & ATTENDANCE

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

•  Average Board attendance of over 95% in 2018

•  Annual Board and committee evaluations

•   In 2018, reached out to holders of over 51% of outstanding shares

•   Engaged with holders of 32% of outstanding shares

•   Topics included Board oversight of our long-term business strategy, our CEO transition, key governance and compensation practices, sustainability, and our Board refreshment practices

•   Shareholder feedback informs Board decision-making,including re-inclusion of management proposals to eliminate super-majority vote provisions



DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 9


Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

Criteria for Director Nominees

The Board, in part through its delegation to the Governance and Nominating Committee, seeks to recommend qualified individuals to become members of the Board. The Board selects individuals as director nominees who, in the opinion of the Board, demonstrate the highest personal and professional integrity as well as exceptional ability and judgment, who can serve as a sounding board for our CEO on planning and policy, and who will be most effective, in connection with the other nominees to the Board, in collectively serving the long-term interests of all our shareholders.

Key areas of expertise for director nominees, which are reflected in our current director nominees, include:

Strategic M&A

Experience with international acquisitions, post-merger integration, and portfolio restructuring

Global Operations and Management

Experience with cross-border transactions, global market entry and expansion, and implementation of operational efficiency

Strategy Development and Execution

Capital allocation and strategic planning expertise

Capital Markets Expertise

Experience with capital markets and complex financing transactions

Deep and Diverse Industry Knowledge

Experience with diversified manufacturing in many of the markets and product areas relevant to Dover’s businesses

Risk Management Expertise

Experience evaluating risk management policies and procedures

Audit and Corporate Governance Matters

Experience with assurance and audit, regulation, and financial reporting

Human Capital Management

Experience attracting, developing and retaining talent and building strong cultures

Executive Leadership Experience

Leadership experience as former CEOs and CFOs of global public companies

In considering diversity in selecting director nominees, the Governance and Nominating Committee gives weight to the extent to which candidates would increase the effectiveness of the Board by broadening the mix of experience, knowledge, backgrounds, skills, ages and tenures represented among its members.

The Governance and Nominating Committee also considers our current Board composition and the projected retirement date of current directors, as well as such other factors it may deem to be in the best interests of Dover and its shareholders, including a director nominee’s leadership and operating experience (particularly as a CEO), financial and investment expertise and strategic planning experience.

The Board prefers nominees to be independent, but believes it is desirable to have our CEO on the Board as a representative of current management. Given the global reach and broad array of the types of businesses operated by Dover, the Governance and Nominating Committee highly values director nominees with multi-industry and multi-geographic experience.

Director Nomination Process

Whenever the Governance and Nominating Committee concludes that a new nominee to our Board is required or advisable, it will consider recommendations from directors, management, shareholders and, if it deems appropriate,

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1012


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

consultants retained2022 Director Nominees

There are ten nominees for that purpose. In such circumstances, itelection to our Board at this Annual Meeting, each to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or his or her earlier removal, resignation or retirement. All of the nominees currently serve on our Board and are being proposed for re-election by our Board.

If any nominee for election becomes unavailable or unwilling to serve as a director before the Annual Meeting, an event which we do not anticipate, the persons named as proxies will evaluate individuals recommendedvote for a substitute nominee or nominees as may be designated by shareholdersour Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors. Directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast in connection with their election.

  LOGO

Deborah L. DeHaas

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2021

Age: 62

Committees:   Audit

Skills and Qualifications:

Significant leadership, financial and corporate governance expertise garnered from her nearly 40 years of experience at major audit, assurance and consulting firms

Certified public accountant (“CPA”) and has extensive experience with financial, accounting, internal controls, and enterprise risk management

Has deep expertise on governance, both as a topic and discipline, developed during her career at Deloitte

As a member of the Value Reporting Foundation Board (formerly the SASB Foundation Board), contributes valuable and well-informed insights on a variety of ESG matters

Brings relevant public company board service, serving on the board of CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Brings experience and perspective on matters regarding human capital and culture, including diversity and inclusion

Holds a bachelor’s degree in management science and accounting from Duke University

Included in the same mannerNational Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) Directorship 100 from 2015-2020, recognizing influential leaders in corporate governance and is also an NACD Board Leadership Fellow

Business Experience:

CEO of the Corporate Leadership Center, a non-profit leadership development forum

Former Vice Chairman and National Managing Partner of the Center for Board Effectiveness at Deloitte

Former member of the U.S. Executive Committee

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Inclusion Officer

Former member of the U.S. Board of Directors

Former Vice Chairman and Central Region Managing Partner

Former Vice Chairman and Midwest Regional Managing Partner

Former Regional Managing Partner, Strategic Clients

Former positions of increasing responsibility at Arthur Andersen, an audit, financial advisory, tax and consulting firm, most recently as nominees recommendedManaging Partner & Business Advisory Assurance, Central Region

Other Board Experience:

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 13


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2018

Age: 65

Committees:   Audit, Finance

Skills and Qualifications:

Extensive experience in corporate finance, capital markets, and mergers and acquisitions

Served as a strategic and financial advisor to his clients, forming deep relationships with companies in a range of industries

Has nearly four decades of experience in the professional and financial services industry

Deep expertise in financial management, coupled with his analytical and collaborative mindset, allows him to make invaluable contributions to our Board

Strong background in senior leadership development, succession planning, and organizational culture development

Brings to the Board considerable expertise in financial risk oversight and capital allocation

Bachelor’s degree in political economy from Dartmouth College and an MBA from Harvard University

Business Experience:

Retired Managing Director at Goldman Sachs

Served as Advisory Director and Partner-in-Charge, Midwest Region Investment Banking Services

Served as Managing Director at Travelers Group Inc.

Former Associate, Mergers and Acquisitions at Morgan Stanley

Former Consultant, Corporate Strategy at Bain & Company

Former Assistant Treasurer, Corporate Banking at Chase Manhattan Bank

Former News Reporter at The Providence Journal Company

Other Board Experience:

Director and Chair of Audit Committee of Meijer, Inc. (“Meijer”)

Director of AAR Corp.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 14


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Kristiane C. Graham

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 1999

Age: 64

Committees:   Compensation, Governance and Nominating

Skills and Qualifications:

Experience as a private investor with substantial holdings of Dover stock and her shared interests in Dover, including interests through charitable organizations of which she is a director, makes her a good surrogate for our individual and retail investors

Experience with a commercial bank, primarily as a loan officer; founded and operated an advisory company and a publication regarding international thoroughbred racing and now co-manages her family’s investments

Actively works with and has served on the boards of various organizations to support the objectives of local communities, affordable housing, education, and health

Currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Walter N. Ridley Scholarship Fund at the University of Virginia

Serves as an Emeritus Trustee of the College Foundation of the University of Virginia and has previously served on the Advisory Board of the University of Virginia School of Nursing

Brings valuable insights on the development of our policies and strategies relating to talent, leadership, and culture, with a focus on diversity and inclusion

Devoted substantial time to monitoring the development of Dover operating company leaders, enabling her to provide the Board valuable insights regarding management succession

As a member of one of the founding families of Dover, Ms. Graham also brings to the Board a sense of Dover’s historical values, culture and strategic vision which the Board believes is beneficial as it considers various strategic planning alternatives for shaping Dover’s future

Business Experience:

Private Investor

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 15


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Michael F. Johnston

Independent Board Chair; Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2013

Age: 74

Committees:   Compensation, Governance and Nominating

Skills and Qualifications:

Brings industry insight, financial expertise and leadership experience garnered from his 17 years on the boards of global companies

Served as CEO of an $18 billion global manufacturer

Mr. Johnston also brings valuable corporate governance perspectives from his prior board service, including as a lead Director and Chair of other sources.major public companies

Brings deep operations experience has helped him gain knowledge and a deep understanding in manufacturing, design, innovation, engineering, accounting and finance and capital structure

Brings nearly two decades of experience in building businesses in emerging economies

Bachelor’s degree in industrial management from the University of Massachusetts and an MBA from Michigan State University

Business Experience:

Former CEO and President of Visteon Corporation (“Visteon”)

Former Chief Operating Officer of Visteon

Former President of North America/Asia Pacific, Automotive Systems Group, of Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Johnson Controls”)

Former President of Americas Automotive Group of Johnson Controls

Other Board Experience:

Director of Armstrong Flooring, Inc.

Former Chairman and Director of Visteon

Former Director of Armstrong World Industries, Flowserve Corporation, and Whirlpool Corporation

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 16


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Eric A. Spiegel

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2017

Age: 64

Committees:   Audit, Finance (Chair)

Skills and Qualifications:

Experienced business leader with diversified, global experience who brings deep and valuable expertise in strategy development, corporate restructuring, portfolio management and M&A to our Board

40+ years of experience working with large, global companies in the energy and industrial markets, mostly recently as President & CEO of Siemens USA

At Siemens, he led strategic reviews across a portfolio of ~45 businesses in the company’s largest market with over $22 billion in revenue, 50,000 employees and over 60 manufacturing facilities

Led the acquisition, divestiture, joint venture and carve-out of over 30 business units and segments

Executed Siemens’ “Vision 2020” initiative to optimize growth and margins in the U.S., across all sectors

Prior to Siemens, Mr. Spiegel was a global consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton focused on complex organizations in the energy, power, chemical, water, industrial and automotive fields

At Booz, he worked with major energy clients globally on projects around corporate strategy, M&A, major capital projects, cost restructuring, margin enhancement and supply chain re-design and was also closely involved with the government sector

An expert on the global energy industry, Mr. Spiegel co-authored the book Energy Shift: Game-changing Options for Fueling the Future

Holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Harvard University and an MBA from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College

Business Experience:

Special Advisor at Brighton Park Capital, a private equity firm, where he supports the firm’s sector investment teams and portfolio companies by providing strategic counsel on industry trends and growth strategies

Former President and CEO of Siemens USA

Former Managing Partner, Global Energy, Chemicals, and Power, and Managing Partner, Washington, D.C. office, and other roles at Booz & Company, Inc. (now known as Strategy&) and Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., global consulting firms

Former Associate, Energy and Industrials Practice, at Temple, Barker & Sloane, Inc. (now known as Oliver Wyman)

Former Marketing and Strategy Manager at Brown Boveri & Cie (now known as ABB), a Swiss group of electrical engineering companies

In connection with his position at Brighton Park Capital, Mr. Spiegel serves as Chair of Relatient, Inc.

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee Chair of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc.

Director and Audit Committee Chair of Project Energy Reimagined Acquisition Corp.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 17


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Richard J. Tobin

Chief Executive Officer

Director since: 2016

Age: 58

Committees:   None

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Tobin is Dover’s current CEO. The Board believes it is desirable to have one active management representative on the Board to facilitate its access to timely and relevant information and its oversight of management’s long-term strategy, planning, and performance

Has a broad range of industry and functional experiences acquired through regional and global leadership positions

Former CEO of CNH Industrial, a complex international industrial company, where he led efforts to increase efficiencies, innovate through new technologies, expand geographically, and maximize the company’s portfolio of businesses

Gained extensive experience in international finance, operations, management, and information technology in his prior roles

Developed deep expertise with global capital markets through his international finance leadership roles

Prior to beginning his business career, Mr. Tobin was an officer in the United States Army

Member of the Board of Trustees of the John G. Shedd Aquarium in Chicago

Formerly served on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, and is a former member of the Business Roundtable

Holds a bachelor of arts from Norwich University and an MBA from Drexel University

Business Experience:

President and CEO of Dover

Former CEO of CNH Industrial NV (“CNH Industrial”)

Former Group Chief Operating Officer of Fiat Industrial S.p.A

Former President and CEO of CNH Global NV

Former CFO of CNH Global NV

Former Chief Finance Officer & Head of Information Technology of SGS Group

Former Chief Operating Officer for North America of SGS Group

Other Board Experience:

Director of KeyCorp.

Former director of CNH Industrial

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 18


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Stephen M. Todd

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2010

Age: 73

Committees:   Audit (Chair)

Skills and Qualifications:

Extensive accounting and financial experience in both domestic and international business developed during a four decade career at Ernst & Young where he specialized in assurance and audit

Brings unique insights into accounting and financial issues relevant to multinational companies like Dover

Brings the perspective of an outside auditor to the Audit Committee

Brings leadership and financial strategy experience as developer and director of Ernst & Young’s Global Capital Markets Centers, which provides accounting, regulatory, internal control and financial reporting services to multinational companies in connection with cross-border debt and equity securities transactions and acquisitions

Business Experience:

Former Global Vice of Assurance Professional Practice of Ernst & Young Global Limited, London, UK; and prior thereto, various positions with Ernst & Young

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee member of ChampionX Corporation (formerly known as Apergy Corporation)

Former member of the Board of Trustees of PNC Funds

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 19


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Stephen K. Wagner

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2010

Age: 74

Committees:   Audit, Governance and Nominating (Chair)

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Wagner’s over 30 years of experience in accounting make him a valuable resource for the Board and the Audit Committee

His work with Sarbanes-Oxley and other corporate governance regulations, including his years as Managing Partner at Deloitte & Touche’s Center for Corporate Governance, makes him well suited to advise the Board on financial, auditing and finance-related corporate governance matters as well as risk management

Expert in risk oversight and co-authored a book on risk management entitled Surviving and Thriving in Uncertainty: Creating the Risk Intelligent Enterprise

Brings to the Board an outside auditor’s perspective on matters involving audit committee procedures, internal control and accounting and financial reporting matters

Business Experience:

Former Senior Advisor, Center for Corporate Governance, of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”)

Former Managing Partner, Center for Corporate Governance of Deloitte

Former Deputy Managing Partner, Innovation, Audit and Enterprise Risk, United States of Deloitte

Former Co-Leader, Sarbanes-Oxley Services, of Deloitte

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee member of ChampionX Corporation (formerly known as Apergy Corporation)

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 20


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Keith E. Wandell

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2015

Age: 72

Committees:   Compensation (Chair), Finance

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Wandell brings to the Board the valuable perspective of a strategic, experienced leader with a strong record focused on growth, profitability, international expansion and innovation.

Has over 30 years of experience in diversified manufacturing businesses, most recently as the former Chairman and CEO of Harley-Davidson, Inc. (“Harley-Davidson”) where he led transformation efforts across the company’s product development, manufacturing and retail functions, focused on international expansion and implemented a restructuring plan

Prior to joining Harley-Davidson, Mr. Wandell served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Johnson Controls”) and helped manage the company’s entry into the Chinese car-battery market as well as its subsequent joint venture with China’s largest battery manufacturer

Gained valuable insights into the effective development of executive leadership capabilities and strong corporate cultures through his experience as a senior leader at various companies

Served on the boards of four other public companies, including the two on which he currently serves

Holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Ohio University and an MBA from the University of Dayton

Business Experience:

Former President and CEO of Harley-Davidson

Former President and Chief Operating Officer of Johnson Controls

Former Executive Vice President of Johnson Controls

Former Corporate Vice President of Johnson Controls

Former President of the Automotive Experience business of Johnson Controls

Former President of the Power Solutions business of Johnson Controls

Other Board Experience:

Director of Dana Incorporated. Former Chairman of Harley-Davidson

Former Director of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Clarcor, Inc.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 21


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

Mary A. Winston

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2005

Age: 60

Committees: Compensation, Finance

Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Winston brings to the Board valuable experience and expertise based on her years of broad financial management and broad executive leadership experience.

Started her career as a CPA with Arthur Andersen & Co, and has extensive experience with financial, accounting and internal control matters for large public companies.

Served as CFO of three large companies: Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Giant Eagle, Inc. and Scholastic, Inc., as well as prior global finance leadership roles (prior to 2004) at Visteon Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.

Developed deep expertise in capital markets, M&A, capital structure matters, capital allocation, financial risk management, real estate financing transactions, dividend and stock repurchase programs, and investor relations

Ms. Winston’s background and experience make her a valuable contributor to the Board on matters involving risk oversight and capital allocation, as well as executive compensation and general corporate governance matters

Holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Wisconsin and an MBA from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management

Designated as a Board Leadership Fellow by the NACD and serves on the national board of the NACD

Business Experience:

President of WinsCo Enterprises Inc

Former Interim CEO, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.

Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

Former Senior Vice President and CFO of Giant Eagle, Inc.

Former President of WinsCo Financial LLC

Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Scholastic Corporation

Other Board Experience:

Director of Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Chipotle Mexican Grill, and Acuity Brands, Inc.

Former Director of Domtar Corporation, SUPERVALU INC., and Plexus Corporation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH

OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 22


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Oversight and Governance Practices

Our Board is responsible for, and committed to, overseeing our long-term strategic development as well as managing the principal and most significant risks that we face. In carrying out this duty, our Board advises senior management to help drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. The Board delegates specific areas of responsibility to relevant Board committees, as detailed below under the heading “Overview of Committee Responsibilities”, who report on their deliberations to the Board. The following summarizes our Board’s key areas of oversight responsibility.

Board Oversight

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

Long-Term

Business Strategy

•   One of the primary responsibilities of our Board is the oversight of management’s long-term strategy and planning. Accordingly, our Board maintains a deep level of engagement with management in setting and overseeing Dover’s long-term business strategy.

Capital Allocation

•   Our Board is focused on the efficient allocation of capital to drive growth and provide returns to our shareholders. Our capital allocation priorities are organic investments, strategic acquisitions, and the return of capital to our shareholders.

•   We consistently return cash to shareholders by paying dividends, which have increased annually over each of the last 66 years.

•   We also undertake opportunistic share repurchases as part of our capital allocation strategy, completing $21.6 million of share repurchases in 2021 and $106.3 million in 2020.

•   We made $171.5 million in capital expenditures in 2021, representing 2.2% of revenue, and $165.7 million in capital expenditures in 2020, representing 2.5% of revenue, in line with our priority of organic reinvestment to grow and strengthen our existing businesses.

•   We employ a prudent financial policy to support our capital allocation strategy, which includes maintaining an investment grade credit rating.

Portfolio

Management

•   Businesses in our portfolio are continually evaluated for strategic fit.

•   We seek to deploy capital in acquisitions in attractive growth areas across our five segments. We focus primarily on bolt-on acquisitions, applying strict selection criteria of market attractiveness (including growth, market landscape, and performance-based competition), business fit (including sustained leading position, revenue visibility, and favorable customer value-add versus switching cost or risk) and financial return profile (accretive growth and margins and double-digit return on invested capital).

•   We have sold or divested some of our businesses based on changes in specific market outlook, structural changes in financial performance, value-creation potential, or for other strategic considerations, which included an effort to reduce our exposure to cyclical markets or focus on our higher margin growth spaces.

•   In recognition of recent portfolio changes, we recently changed the name of the Fueling Solutions segment to “Clean Energy & Fueling,” and the Refrigeration & Food Equipment segment to “Climate & Sustainability Technologies” to better reflect the markets and customers served by the businesses within these segments.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 23


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

Risk
Management

•   Our Board has established a comprehensive enterprise risk management process to identify and manage risks, and periodically reviews the processes established by management to identify and manage risks and communicates with management about these processes.

•   We have established a risk assessment team consisting of senior executives, which annually, with the assistance of a consultant, oversees a risk assessment made at the corporate center, segment and operating company levels and, with that information in mind, performs an assessment of the overall risks our company may face and reports to the Board on that assessment. Each quarter, this team reassesses the risks, the severity of these risks, and the status of efforts to mitigate them.

ESG

•   The full Board has oversight of ESG matters and is regularly briefed on strategic planning, risks, and opportunities related to ESG by senior management, including our CEO.

•   Our Compensation Committee has integrated ESG oversight responsibility into our CEO’s individual strategic objectives within the AIP.

Culture & Human
Capital
Management

•   Our entrepreneurial culture depends upon an inclusive approach that values employees’ diversity and contributions.

•   We foster an operating culture with high ethical standards that values accountability, rigor, trust, inclusion, respect, and open communication and is designed to encourage individual growth and operational effectiveness. We continue to make significant investments in talent development, including in the areas of digital applications and operational management, and recognize that the growth and development of our employees is essential for our continued success.

•   As part of our commitment to strong corporate governance practices, we maintain an active and robust ethics program. Our Code of Business Conduct & Ethics (“Code of Conduct”) applies to all employees and directors of Dover and its subsidiaries. We enforce our Code of Conduct fairly and consistently, regardless of one’s position in Dover, and will not tolerate retaliation against those who report suspected misconduct in good faith.

Succession
Planning

•   Another of the Board’s primary responsibilities is overseeing a sound Board and management succession process. The Board has developed a comprehensive plan to address management succession — both over the long term and for emergency purposes. The framework for the long-term plan includes thoughtful, deliberate monitoring of management beyond our top executives to ensure Dover continues to build a deep internal bench of talent.

•   Our Board is also focused on its own succession plan, which drives not only our director selection efforts, but also how we approach Board and committee leadership structure and membership, with a focus on critical board skills, diversity, and independence.

Cybersecurity

•   The full Board is briefed on enterprise-wide cybersecurity risk management and the overall cybersecurity risk environment, and oversees major tasks related to cybersecurity risk management, periodically reviews our response capabilities, and meets with the Chief Information Security Officer on at least an annual basis.

•   Dover employs the National Institute of Standards & Technology Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (The NIST Framework). This voluntary guidance developed with much private sector input provides a framework and a toolkit for organizations to manage cybersecurity risk.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 24


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Committees

Our Board has four standing committees — the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Finance Committee. The table below sets forth a summary of our committee structure and membership information.

     

 DIRECTOR

  Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Governance

and

Nominating
Committee

 Finance

Committee

 DEBORAH L. DEHAAS

     

 H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR.

  

   

 KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM

   

 

 

 MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON

     

 ERIC A. SPIEGEL

      (Chair)

 RICHARD J. TOBIN

     

 STEPHEN M. TODD

  

 (Chair)

   

 STEPHEN K. WAGNER

     (Chair) 

 KEITH E. WANDELL

   

 (Chair)

  

 MARY A. WINSTON

   

  

 MEETINGS HELD IN 2021

  8 

5

 4 

9

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 25


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Overview of Committee Responsibilities

Audit Committee

    Stephen M. Todd (Chair)    

    Deborah L. DeHaas

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Eric A. Spiegel

    Stephen K. Wagner

Key Responsibilities

•  Selecting and engaging our independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditors”)

•  Overseeing the work of our independent auditors and our internal audit function

•  Approving in advance all services to be provided by, and all fees to be paid to, our independent auditors, who report directly to the committee

•  Reviewing with management and the independent auditors the audit plan and results of the auditing engagement

•  Reviewing with management and our independent auditors the quality and adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting

The Audit Committee holds regular quarterly meetings at which it meets separately with each of our independent registered public accounting firm, PwC, our internal audit function, financial management and our general counsel to assess certain matters including the status of the independent audit process, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the operation and effectiveness of our compliance program. In addition, the Audit Committee, as a whole, reviews and meets to discuss the contents of each Form 10-Q and Form 10-K (including the financial statements) prior to its filing with the SEC.

Our Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the SEC rules.

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

Compensation Committee

    Keith E. Wandell (Chair)     

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

The Compensation Committee, together with our independent directors, approves compensation for the CEO of Dover. The functions of the Compensation Committee also include:

•  Approving compensation for executive officers who report directly to the CEO (together with the CEO, “senior executive officers”)

•  Granting awards and approving payouts under our 2012 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2012 LTIP”), our 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2021 LTIP”). and our AIP

•  Approving changes to our executive compensation plans

•  Reviewing and recommending compensation for the Board

•  Overseeing succession planning and management development programs

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 26


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Governance and Nominating Committee

    Stephen K. Wagner (Chair)

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

Key Responsibilities

•  Developing and recommending corporate governance principles to our Board

•  Annually reviewing the requisite skills and characteristics of board members as well as the size, composition, functioning and needs of our Board as a whole

•  Considering and recommending to the Board nominees for election to, or for filling any vacancy on, our Board in accordance with our by-laws, our governance guidelines, and the committee’s charter

•  Identifying and recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in the size and composition of our Board

•  Recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in structure and membership of our Board’s committees

•  Providing oversight of Dover’s practices on political contributions and lobbying expenses and reviewing annually Dover’s political contributions and lobbying expenses

The Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

Finance Committee

    Eric A. Spiegel (Chair)       

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Keith E. Wandell

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

•  Reviewing and recommending for approval by the Board proposed changes to dividend policies, stock splits, and repurchase programs

•  Reviewing our capital structure, liquidity, and financing plans

•  Reviewing and approving the registration and issuance of debt or equity securities

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, capital expenditures

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, M&A transactions

•  Oversight of treasury, insurance, and tax planning matters

The Finance Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 27


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Corporate Governance

Our Board is committed to sound governance practices and regularly reviews and refines our profile to reflect evolving best practices and matters raised by our shareholders. The following summarizes key aspects of our governance framework.

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Independent

Board of Directors

• All directors are independent, other than our CEO, and our Board has leadership that is independent from management, by way of an independent Chair.

Commitment to Diversity

• In 2020, our Board adopted a policy reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines requiring that the initial list of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity.

Special
Shareholder
Meetings

• In 2020, we amended our by-laws to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting of shareholders to 15% or more of the voting power of our outstanding stock from 25%.

Elimination of
Super-majority Provisions

• All of the supermajority voting provisions in our charter were eliminated in 2019.

Board Committee Refreshment

• Our Board periodically reviews committee composition and chair positions, seeking the appropriate blend of continuity and fresh perspectives on committees.

Annual Majority
Vote Director
Elections &
Mandatory
Resignation Policy

• All of our directors are elected annually by our shareholders.

• Our directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections to be elected.

• We have a director resignation policy that requires a director to tender an irrevocable resignation letter to the Board prior to being nominated, contingent on the director not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. The Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the full Board whether to accept the resignation or whether to take other action.

Proxy Access

• Our by-laws permit a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our by-laws.

Board Leadership Structure

We believe that having an independent leader of the Board is important to the Board’s oversight role and decision-making involving corporate strategy, performance, succession, and other critical matters. Under our current Board leadership structure, our Board has leadership that is independent from management by way of an independent Chair. Our CEO is also a member of the Board as a management representative. We believe this is important to make information and insight directly available to the directors in their deliberations. In our view, this board leadership structure gives us an appropriate, well-functioning balance between non-management and management directors that combines experience, accountability and effective risk oversight.

Board, Committee and Individual Director Evaluations

Our Board and its committees conduct robust annual self-evaluations of their performance. In addition, our Board evaluates one-third of our directors on a rotating individual basis each year with the purpose of assisting each director to be a more effective member of the Board. New directors undergo the evaluation process in each of their first two years on the Board. Our directors believe the rotational nature of our evaluation process enables a more in-depth, comprehensive evaluation for each of our directors.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 28


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Directors’ Meetings and Attendance

During 2021, the Board met seven times. No director attended less than 75% of the board and standing committee meetings held while he or she was a member of the Board and relevant standing committee. Average board attendance was over 97% in 2021. Our independent directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions at least quarterly without management representatives or non-independent directors present. The Chair of the Board presides at these sessions. We expect our directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.

Our directors also regularly engage with management and outside subject matter experts outside of formal meetings. Examples include developing agendas and reviewing the content of materials in advance of meetings, calls, or in-person meetings with members of management to prepare for meetings, receiving periodic updates from management on significant operational or strategic developments between meetings, and, from time to time, engaging with shareholders.

Management Meetings and Site Visits

We encourage our directors to meet with senior managers throughout the enterprise and attend management’s strategic planning sessions. When considering businesses to visit, priority goes to those businesses identified as strategically important as well as those that were recently acquired. From time to time, the Board makes on-site visits to our businesses to tour the manufacturing facilities and meet face-to-face with company management and employees. These visits serve as an important tool in the Board’s succession planning process for our senior leadership team and enable a deeper understanding of our businesses and our culture. In 2021, these types of opportunities for engagement were largely conducted virtually rather than in-person.

Director Orientation and Education

All new directors participate in our director orientation program. New directors meet with senior corporate leaders to review and discuss our businesses, operations, strategy, end markets, governance, internal controls, and culture. We believe that our on-boarding approach, coupled with participation in regular Board and committee meetings, as well as additional exposure to our business through participation in management meetings and site visits, whether virtually or in-person, provides new directors a strong foundation in our businesses and accelerates their effectiveness to fully engage in Board deliberations.

Our Board also encourages directors to participate annually in continuing director education programs outside of the Boardroom, and we reimburse directors for their expenses associated with this participation.

Director Independence

Our Board has determined that each of the current members of the Board, except for Richard J. Tobin, who is our CEO, has no material relationship with Dover and satisfies all the criteria for being “independent” members of our Board. This includes the criteria established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards, as well as our standards for classification as an independent director which are available on our website at www.dovercorporation.com. Our Board makes an annual determination of the independence of each nominee for director prior to his or her nomination for re-election. No director may be deemed independent unless the Board determines that he or she has no material relationship with Dover, directly or as an officer, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a material relationship with Dover.

Majority Standard for Election of Directors and Mandatory Resignation Policy

Under our by-laws and corporate governance guidelines, the voting standard in director elections is a majority of the votes cast. Under this majority of the votes cast standard, a director must receive more votes in favor of his or her election than votes against his or her election. Abstentions and broker non-votes do not count as votes cast with respect to a director’s election. In contested director elections (where there are more nominees than available seats on the board), the plurality standard will apply. Under the plurality standard, the nominees who receive the most “for” votes are elected to the Board until all seats are filled.

For an incumbent director to be nominated for re-election, he or she must submit an irrevocable resignation letter. The resignation will be contingent on the nominee not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and on the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. If an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 29


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

election, the Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to our Board concerning whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. Our Board will act on the resignation within 90 days following certification of the election results, taking into account the committee’s recommendation. The Board will publicly announce its decision and, if the resignation is rejected, the rationale for its decision.

Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics

Our Board long ago adopted written corporate governance guidelines that set forth the responsibilities of our Board and the qualifications and independence of its members and the members of its standing committees. The Board reviews these guidelines at least annually, in light of evolving best practices, shareholder feedback and the evolution of our business. In 2020, the Board amended the guidelines to require that initial lists of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity. In addition, our Board has a long-standing Code of Conduct setting forth standards applicable to all of our companies and their employees, a code of ethics for our CEO and senior financial officers, and charters for each of its standing committees. All of these documents (referred to collectively as “governance materials”) are available on our website at www.dovercorporation.com.

Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions

We generally do not engage in transactions in which our senior executive officers or directors, any of their immediate family members or any of our 5% shareholders have a material interest. Should a proposed transaction or series of similar transactions involve any such persons and an amount that exceeds $120,000, it would be subject to review and approval by the Governance and Nominating Committee in accordance with a written policy and the procedures adopted by our Board, which are available with the governance materials on our website.

Under the procedures, management determines whether a proposed transaction requires review under the policy and, if so, presents the transaction to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction and approves or rejects the transaction. If the proposed transaction is immaterial or it is impractical or undesirable to defer the proposed transaction until the next committee meeting, the Chair of the committee decides whether to (i) approve the transaction and report the transaction at the next meeting or (ii) call a special meeting of the committee to review and approve the transaction. Should the proposed transaction involve the CEO or enough members of the Governance and Nominating Committee to prevent a quorum, the disinterested members of the committee will review the transaction and make a recommendation to the Board, and the disinterested members of the Board will then approve or reject the transaction. No director may participate in the review of any transaction in which he or she is a related person.

Communication with Directors

The Audit Committee has established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters (“accounting matters”) and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting matters. Such complaints or concerns may be submitted to Dover, care of our Corporate Secretary or through the communications coordinator, an external service provider, by mail, fax, telephone, or via the internet as published on our website. The communications coordinator forwards such communications to Dover without disclosing the identity of the sender if anonymity is requested.

Shareholders and other interested persons may also communicate with our Board and the non-management directors in any of these same manners. Such communications are forwarded to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 30


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Shareholder Engagement and History of Board Responsiveness

Shareholder Nominations for Director

Shareholders who wish to recommend an individual for nomination should send that person’s name and supporting information to the Governance and Nominating Committee, in care of the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 3005 Highland Parkway, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60515, or through our communications coordinator. Shareholders who wish to directly nominate an individual for election as a director, without going through the Governance and Nominating Committee, must comply with the procedures in ourby-laws. Please see “General Information About the Annual Meeting” for nomination deadlines.

Proxy Access Shareholder Right

Following extensive engagement with our shareholders, our Board determined to adopt proxy access in February 2016, permitting a shareholder or group of up to 20 shareholders holding 3% of our outstanding shares of common stock for at least three years to nominate a number of directors constituting the greater of two directors or 20% of the number of directors on our Board, as set forth in detail in ourby-laws.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1112


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

20192022 Director Nominees

There are nineten nominees for election to our Board at this Annual Meeting, each to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or his or her earlier removal, resignation or retirement. All of the nominees currently serve on our Board and are being proposed forre-election by our Board.

Current directors Peter T. Francis and Richard K. Lochridge are not standing forre-election and will retire from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting.

If any nominee for election becomes unavailable or unwilling for good cause to serve as a director before the Annual Meeting, an event which we do not anticipate, the persons named as proxies will vote for a substitute nominee or nominees as may be designated by our Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors. Directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast in connection with their election.

 

LOGO

  LOGO

Deborah L. DeHaas

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2021

Age: 62

Committees:   Audit

Skills and Qualifications:

Significant leadership, financial and corporate governance expertise garnered from her nearly 40 years of experience at major audit, assurance and consulting firms

Certified public accountant (“CPA”) and has extensive experience with financial, accounting, internal controls, and enterprise risk management

Has deep expertise on governance, both as a topic and discipline, developed during her career at Deloitte

As a member of the Value Reporting Foundation Board (formerly the SASB Foundation Board), contributes valuable and well-informed insights on a variety of ESG matters

Brings relevant public company board service, serving on the board of CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Brings experience and perspective on matters regarding human capital and culture, including diversity and inclusion

Holds a bachelor’s degree in management science and accounting from Duke University

Included in the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) Directorship 100 from 2015-2020, recognizing influential leaders in corporate governance and is also an NACD Board Leadership Fellow

Business Experience:

CEO of the Corporate Leadership Center, a non-profit leadership development forum

Former Vice Chairman and National Managing Partner of the Center for Board Effectiveness at Deloitte

Former member of the U.S. Executive Committee

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Inclusion Officer

Former member of the U.S. Board of Directors

Former Vice Chairman and Central Region Managing Partner

Former Vice Chairman and Midwest Regional Managing Partner

Former Regional Managing Partner, Strategic Clients

Former positions of increasing responsibility at Arthur Andersen, an audit, financial advisory, tax and consulting firm, most recently as Managing Partner & Business Advisory Assurance, Central Region

Other Board Experience:

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 13


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  LOGO

 

H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

 

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2018

Age: 62

Director since 201865

 

Committees Served:Committees:   Audit, Finance

 

Business Experience: Retired Managing Director (1997 to 2012) at Goldman Sachs, a global investment banking, securities and investment management firm; also served as Advisory Director (2013 to 2015), andPartner-in-Charge, Midwest Region Investment Banking Services (2001 to 2010); prior thereto, various positions within Goldman Sachs (since 1987, except where noted). Mr. Gilbertson previously served as Managing Director at Travelers Group Inc. (1995), a financial services company; Associate, Mergers and Acquisitions at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (1985 to 1987), a financial services firm; Consultant, Corporate Strategy at Bain & Company (1982 to 1985), a management consulting firm; Assistant Treasurer, Corporate Banking at Chase Manhattan Bank (1979 to 1981), a commercial bank; and News Reporter at The Providence Journal Company (1978), a metropolitan daily newspaper.

Other Board Experience

Skills and Qualifications:: Director and Chair of Audit Committee of Meijer, Inc. (“Meijer”)

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Mr. Gilbertson has extensiveExtensive experience in corporate finance, capital markets, and mergers and acquisitions and the insights he gained as an advisor to clients across a broad range of industries bring valuable perspective to our Board.

 

Throughout his career, Mr. Gilbertson has servedServed as a strategic and financial advisor to his clients, forming deep relationships with companies in a range of industries including Baxter International, Walgreens, The Boeing Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Exelon Corporation.

 

He hasHas nearly four decades of experience in the professional and financial services industry starting his career with Chase Manhattan Bank, then working at Bain & Company, where he lived abroad and served in a corporate strategy consulting role, next joining Morgan Stanley in mergers and acquisitions, and finally at Goldman Sachs, where he helped expand the Midwestern practice.

 

His deepDeep expertise in financial management, coupled with his analytical and collaborative mindset, allowallows him to make invaluable contributions to our Board as it focuses on delivering greater returns from our businesses, funding investments to drive profitable growth, and enhancing shareholder value.

 

Mr. Gilbertson has a strongStrong background in senior leadership development, succession planning, and organizational culture development gained from his time at Goldman Sachs and his service as a director at Meijer, and has first-hand experience assisting in onboarding new CEOs.

 

He also bringsBrings to the Board considerable expertise in financial risk oversight and capital allocation.allocation

 

He earned a bachelor’sBachelor’s degree in political economy from Dartmouth College and an MBA from Harvard University.University

Business Experience:

Retired Managing Director at Goldman Sachs

Served as Advisory Director and Partner-in-Charge, Midwest Region Investment Banking Services

Served as Managing Director at Travelers Group Inc.

Former Associate, Mergers and Acquisitions at Morgan Stanley

Former Consultant, Corporate Strategy at Bain & Company

Former Assistant Treasurer, Corporate Banking at Chase Manhattan Bank

Former News Reporter at The Providence Journal Company

Other Board Experience:

Director and Chair of Audit Committee of Meijer, Inc. (“Meijer”)

Director of AAR Corp.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1214


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Kristiane C. Graham

 

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 1999

Age: 61

Director since 199964

 

Committees Served:Committees:   Compensation, Governance and Nominating

 

Business Experience: Private Investor.

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Ms. Graham’s experienceExperience as a private investor with substantial holdings of Dover stock and her shared interests in Dover, including interests through charitable organizations of which she is a director, makes her a good surrogate for our individual and retail investors.investors

 

Ms. Graham also has past experienceExperience with a commercial bank, primarily as a loan officer. Sheofficer; founded and operated an advisory company and a publication regarding international thoroughbred racing and nowco-manages her family’s investments.investments

 

During her timeActively works with and has served on the boards of various organizations to support the objectives of local communities, affordable housing, education, and health

Currently serves on the Board sheof Directors for the Walter N. Ridley Scholarship Fund at the University of Virginia

Serves as an Emeritus Trustee of the College Foundation of the University of Virginia and has devotedpreviously served on the Advisory Board of the University of Virginia School of Nursing

Brings valuable insights on the development of our policies and strategies relating to talent, leadership, and culture, with a focus on diversity and inclusion

Devoted substantial time to monitoring the development of Dover operating company leaders, enabling her to provide the Board valuable insights regarding management succession.succession

 

As a member of one of the founding families of Dover, Ms. Graham also brings to the Board a sense of Dover’s historical values, culture and strategic vision which the Board believes is beneficial as it considers various strategic planning alternatives for shaping Dover’s future.future

Business Experience:

Private Investor

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 15


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Michael F. Johnston

 

 

 

Independent Board Chair; Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2013

Age: 71

Director since 201374

 

Committees Served:Committees:   Compensation, Governance and Nominating

 

Business Experience: Former CEO (from 2004 to 2008) and President and Chief Operating Officer (from 2000 to 2004) of Visteon Corporation, an automotive components supplier; former President of North America/Asia Pacific, Automotive Systems Group (from 1999 to 2000), President of Americas Automotive Group (from 1997 to 1999), and other senior management positions at Johnson Controls, Inc., an automotive and building services company. In May 2009, Visteon filed for voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Other Board Experience: Director of Armstrong Flooring, Inc. and Whirlpool Corporation. Former Chairman and Director of Visteon Corporation. Former Director of Armstrong World Industries and Flowserve Corporation.

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Mr. Johnston brings to the BoardBrings industry insight, financial expertise and leadership experience garnered from his 17 years on the boards of global companies.companies

 

During his career, he has servedServed as CEO of an $18 billion global manufacturer and has been a lead Director and Chair of other major public companies.

 

Mr. Johnston also brings valuable corporate governance perspectives from his prior board service, while hisincluding as a lead Director and Chair of other major public companies

Brings deep operations experience has helped him gain knowledge and a deep understanding in manufacturing, design, innovation, engineering, accounting and finance and capital structure.structure

 

In addition, he hasBrings nearly 20 yearstwo decades of experience in building businesses in emerging economies.economies

 

Mr. Johnston holds a bachelor’sBachelor’s degree in industrial management from the University of Massachusetts and an MBA from Michigan State University.University

Business Experience:

Former CEO and President of Visteon Corporation (“Visteon”)

Former Chief Operating Officer of Visteon

Former President of North America/Asia Pacific, Automotive Systems Group, of Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Johnson Controls”)

Former President of Americas Automotive Group of Johnson Controls

Other Board Experience:

Director of Armstrong Flooring, Inc.

Former Chairman and Director of Visteon

Former Director of Armstrong World Industries, Flowserve Corporation, and Whirlpool Corporation

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1316


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Eric A. Spiegel

 

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2017

Age: 61

Director since 201764

 

Committees Served:Committees:   Audit, Finance(Chair)

 

Skills and Qualifications:

Experienced business leader with diversified, global experience who brings deep and valuable expertise in strategy development, corporate restructuring, portfolio management and M&A to our Board

40+ years of experience working with large, global companies in the energy and industrial markets, mostly recently as President & CEO of Siemens USA

At Siemens, he led strategic reviews across a portfolio of ~45 businesses in the company’s largest market with over $22 billion in revenue, 50,000 employees and over 60 manufacturing facilities

Led the acquisition, divestiture, joint venture and carve-out of over 30 business units and segments

Executed Siemens’ “Vision 2020” initiative to optimize growth and margins in the U.S., across all sectors

Prior to Siemens, Mr. Spiegel was a global consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton focused on complex organizations in the energy, power, chemical, water, industrial and automotive fields

At Booz, he worked with major energy clients globally on projects around corporate strategy, M&A, major capital projects, cost restructuring, margin enhancement and supply chain re-design and was also closely involved with the government sector

An expert on the global energy industry, Mr. Spiegel co-authored the book Energy Shift: Game-changing Options for Fueling the Future

Holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Harvard University and an MBA from the Tuck School of Business Experienceat Dartmouth College

Business Experience:

Special Advisor at General Atlantic,Brighton Park Capital, a private equity firm, where he supports the firm’s sector investment teams and portfolio companies by providing strategic counsel on industry trends and growth strategies. strategies

Former President and CEO (from 2010 to 2016) of Siemens USA a global business focusing on the areas of electrification, automation and digitalization; former

Former Managing Partner, Global Energy, Chemicals, and Power, and Managing Partner, Washington, D.C. office, and other roles at Booz & Company, Inc. (now known as Strategy&) and Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., global consulting firms (1986 to 2010); former

Former Associate, Energy and Industrials Practice, at Temple, Barker & Sloane, Inc., a management consulting firm (now known as Oliver Wyman) (1984 to 1985; 1980 to 1982): former

Former Marketing and Strategy Manager at Brown Boveri & Cie (now known as ABB), a Swiss group of electrical engineering companies (1982 to 1984).

In connection with his position at General Atlantic,Brighton Park Capital, Mr. Spiegel serves as Chair of the Board of CLEAResult, a privately held portfolio company that provides energy efficiency programs and services in North America.Relatient, Inc.

Other Board Experience

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee Chair of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Spiegel is an experienced business leader with diversified, global experience who brings deep and valuable expertise in strategy development, corporate restructuring, portfolio management and M&A to our Board.

 

He has over 35 yearsDirector and Audit Committee Chair of experience working with large, global companies in the energy and industrial markets, mostly recently as President and CEO of Siemens USA. At Siemens, he led strategic reviews across a portfolio of ~45 businesses in the company’s largest market with over $22 billion in revenue, 50,000 employees and over 60 manufacturing facilities. During that time, he led the acquisition, divestiture, joint venture andcarve-out of over 30 business units and segments. He also executed Siemens’ “Vision 2020” initiative to optimize growth and margins in the U.S., across all sectors.

Prior to Siemens, Mr. Spiegel was a global consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton focused on complex organizations in the energy, power, chemical, water, industrial and automotive fields. At Booz, he lived, and worked with major energy clients, in Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and Latin America on projects around corporate strategy, M&A, major capital projects, cost restructuring, margin enhancement and supply chainre-design and was also closely involved with the government sector.

An expert on the global energy industry, Mr. Spiegelco-authored the bookEnergy Shift: Game-changing Options for Fueling the Future.

He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Harvard University and an MBA from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College.Project Energy Reimagined Acquisition Corp.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1417


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Richard J. Tobin

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

Director since: 2016

Age: 55

Director since 201658

 

Committee Served:Committees:   None

 

Business Experience: President and CEO of Dover (since 2018): former CEO (2013 to 2018) of CNH Industrial NV (“CNH Industrial”), a global manufacturer of agricultural and construction equipment, trucks, commercial vehicles, buses, specialty vehicles and powertrain applications; former Group Chief Operating Officer of Fiat Industrial S.p.A., a global capital goods manufacturer, and President and CEO (each from 2012 to 2013) of CNH Global NV, a multinational manufacturer of agricultural and construction equipment; former CFO of CNH Global NV (2010 to 2012); former Chief Finance Officer & Head of Information Technology (2004 to 2010) of SGS Group, a multinational provider of inspection, verification, testing and certification services; and former Chief Operating Officer for North America (2002 to 2004) of SGS Group.

Skills and Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications::

 

Mr. Tobin is Dover’s current CEO. The Board believes it is desirable to have one active management representative on the Board to facilitate its access to timely and relevant information and its oversight of management’s long-term strategy, planning, and performance.performance

 

He hasHas a broad range of industry and functional experiences acquired through regional and global leadership positions of significant responsibility and scope.

 

He is the formerFormer CEO of CNH Industrial, a complex international industrial company, where he led efforts to increase efficiencies, innovate through new technologies, expand geographically, and maximize the company’s portfolio of businesses.businesses

 

Mr. Tobin gainedGained extensive experience in international finance, operations, management, and information technology in his prior roles as CFO of CNH Global NV and Chief Finance Officer & Head of Information Technology at SGS Group.

 

He has developedDeveloped deep expertise with global capital markets through his international finance leadership roles.roles

 

Prior to beginning his business career, Mr. Tobin was an officer in the United States Army.Army

 

He is a memberMember of the Board of Trustees of the John G. Shedd Aquarium in Chicago. He formerlyChicago

Formerly served on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, and is a former member of the Business Roundtable. Mr. Tobin holdsRoundtable

Holds a bachelor of arts from Norwich University and an MBA from Drexel University.University

Business Experience:

President and CEO of Dover

Former CEO of CNH Industrial NV (“CNH Industrial”)

Former Group Chief Operating Officer of Fiat Industrial S.p.A

Former President and CEO of CNH Global NV

Former CFO of CNH Global NV

Former Chief Finance Officer & Head of Information Technology of SGS Group

Former Chief Operating Officer for North America of SGS Group

Other Board Experience:

Director of KeyCorp.

Former director of CNH Industrial

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1518


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Stephen M. Todd

 

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2010

Age: 70

Director since 201073

 

Committee Served:Committees:   Audit(Chair)

 

Business Experience: Former Global Vice Chairman (from 2003 to 2010) of Assurance Professional Practice of Ernst & Young Global Limited, London, UK, an assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services firm; and prior thereto, various positions with Ernst & Young (since 1971).

Other Board Experience

Skills and Qualifications:: Director and Audit Committee member of Apergy Corporation and Member of the Board of Trustees of PNC Funds (registered management investment company).

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Mr. Todd’s experience in theExtensive accounting profession makes him a valuable resource for the Board and Audit Committee.

Mr. Todd brings to the Board significant financial experience in both domestic and international business followingdeveloped during a40-year four decade career at Ernst & Young where he specialized in assurance and audit.audit

 

Mr. Todd developedBrings unique insights into accounting and directedfinancial issues relevant to multinational companies like Dover

Brings the perspective of an outside auditor to the Audit Committee

Brings leadership and financial strategy experience as developer and director of Ernst & Young’s Global Capital Markets Centers, which provideprovides accounting, regulatory, internal control and financial reporting services to multinational companies in connection with cross-border debt and equity securities transactions and acquisitions making him well suited to advise the Board on capital allocation decisions, financing alternatives, and acquisition activities.

 

Business Experience:

His experience, especially his years asFormer Global Vice Chairmanof Assurance Professional Practice of Ernst & Young Global Limited’s Assurance Professional PracticeLimited, London, UK; and prior thereto, various positions with Ernst & Young

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee member of ChampionX Corporation (formerly known as audit partner for several multinational companies, gives him unique insights into accounting and financial issues relevant to multinational companies like Dover, and he bringsApergy Corporation)

Former member of the perspectiveBoard of an outside auditor to the Audit Committee.Trustees of PNC Funds

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1619


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Stephen K. Wagner

 

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2010

Age: 71

Director since 201074

 

Committees Served:Committees:   Audit, Governance and Nominating(Chair)

 

Business Experience: Former Senior Advisor, Center for Corporate Governance, of Deloitte & Touche LLP, an audit, financial advisory, tax and consulting firm (from 2009 to 2011); Managing Partner, Center for Corporate Governance, of Deloitte (from 2005 to 2009); Deputy Managing Partner, Innovation, Audit and Enterprise Risk, United States, of Deloitte (from 2002 to 2007); andCo-Leader, Sarbanes-Oxley Services, of Deloitte (from 2002 to 2005).

Other Board Experience

Skills and Qualifications:: Director and Audit Committee member of Apergy Corporation

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Mr. Wagner’s over 30 years of experience in accounting make him a valuable resource for the Board and the Audit Committee.Committee

 

His work with Sarbanes-Oxley and other corporate governance regulations, including his years as Managing Partner at Deloitte & Touche’s Center for Corporate Governance, makes him well suited to advise the Board on financial, auditing and finance-related corporate governance matters as well as risk management.management

 

Mr. Wagner is an expert in risk oversight andco-authored a book on risk management entitledSurviving and Thriving in Uncertainty: Creating the Risk Intelligent Enterprise.

Expert in risk oversight and co-authored a book on risk management entitled Surviving and Thriving in Uncertainty: Creating the Risk Intelligent Enterprise

 

He bringsBrings to the Board an outside auditor’s perspective on matters involving audit committee procedures, internal control and accounting and financial reporting matters.matters

Business Experience:

Former Senior Advisor, Center for Corporate Governance, of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”)

Former Managing Partner, Center for Corporate Governance of Deloitte

Former Deputy Managing Partner, Innovation, Audit and Enterprise Risk, United States of Deloitte

Former Co-Leader, Sarbanes-Oxley Services, of Deloitte

Other Board Experience:

Director and Audit Committee member of ChampionX Corporation (formerly known as Apergy Corporation)

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1720


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Keith E. Wandell

 

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2015

Age: 69

Director since 201572

 

Committees Served:Committees:   Compensation(Chair), Finance

 

Business Experience: Former President and CEO (from 2009 to 2015) of Harley-Davidson, Inc., a global motorcycle manufacturer; and former President and Chief Operating Officer (from 2006 to 2009), former Executive Vice President (from 2005 to 2006), former Corporate Vice President (from 1997 to 2005), former President of the Automotive Experience business (from 2003 to 2006) and President of the Power Solutions business (from 1997 to 2003) of Johnson Controls, Inc., a global manufacturer of automotive, power and building solutions.

Other Board Experience

Skills and Qualifications:: Director of Dana Incorporated and Constellation Brands, Inc. Former Chairman of Harley Davidson, Inc. and former Director of Clarcor, Inc.

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Mr. Wandell brings to the Board the valuable perspective of a strategic, experienced leader with a strong record focused on growth, profitability, international expansion and innovation.

 

He hasHas over 30 years of experience in diversified manufacturing businesses, most recently as the former Chairman and CEO of Harley-Davidson, Inc., (“Harley-Davidson”) where he led transformation efforts across the company’s product development, manufacturing and retail functions, focused on international expansion and implemented a restructuring plan.plan

 

Prior to joining Harley-Davidson, Inc., Mr. Wandell served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Johnson Controls”) and helped manage the company’s entry into the Chinesecar-battery market as well as its subsequent joint venture with China’s largest battery manufacturer.manufacturer

 

Mr. Wandell has gainedGained valuable insights into the effective development of executive leadership capabilities and strong corporate cultures through his experience as a senior leader at various companies such as Harley-Davidson and Johnson Controls.

 

In addition to his significant operating, financial and leadership experience in both domestic and international business, Mr. Wandell has servedServed on the boards of four other public companies, including the two on which he currently serves.serves

 

He holdsHolds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Ohio University and an MBA from the University of Dayton.Dayton

Business Experience:

Former President and CEO of Harley-Davidson

Former President and Chief Operating Officer of Johnson Controls

Former Executive Vice President of Johnson Controls

Former Corporate Vice President of Johnson Controls

Former President of the Automotive Experience business of Johnson Controls

Former President of the Power Solutions business of Johnson Controls

Other Board Experience:

Director of Dana Incorporated. Former Chairman of Harley-Davidson

Former Director of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Clarcor, Inc.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1821


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

  LOGO

 

Mary A. Winston

 

 

 

Independent Director Nominee

Director since: 2005

Age: 57

Director since 200560

 

Committees Served:Committees: Compensation, Finance

 

Business Experience: President of WinsCo Enterprises Inc., a consulting firm providing financial and board governance advisory services (since 2016); former Executive Vice President and CFO of Family Dollar Stores, Inc., a general merchandise retailer (from 2012 to 2015); former Senior Vice President and CFO of Giant Eagle, Inc., a grocery and fuel retailer (from 2008 to 2012); former President of WinsCo Financial LLC, a financial and strategic consulting firm (from 2007 to 2008); and former Executive Vice President and CFO of Scholastic Corporation, a children’s publishing and media company (from 2004 to 2007).

Other Board Experience: Director of Domtar Corporation and Acuity Brands, Inc.; Former Director of SUPERVALU INC. and Plexus Corporation.

Skills and Qualifications:

Skills and Qualifications:

 

Ms. Winston brings to the Board valuable experience and expertise based on her years of broad financial management and broad executive leadership experience.

 

Ms. Winston, who startedStarted her career as a CPA with Arthur Andersen & Co, and has extensive experience with financial, accounting and internal control matters for large public companies.

 

Ms. Winston servedServed as CFO of three large companies: Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Giant Eagle, Inc. and Scholastic, Inc., as well as prior global finance leadership roles (prior to 2004) at Visteon Corporation and Pfizer, Inc. Through these experiences, she developed

Developed deep expertise in capital markets, M&A, capital structure matters, capital allocation, financial risk management, real estate financing transactions, dividend and stock repurchase programs, and investor relations.relations

 

Ms. Winston’s background and experience make her a valuable contributor to the Board on matters involving risk oversight and capital allocation, as well as executive compensation and general corporate governance matters.matters

 

She holdsHolds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Wisconsin and an MBA from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management. She has been designatedManagement

Designated as a Board Leadership Fellow by the NACD and serves as Chairon the national board of the NACD Carolinas chapter.

Business Experience:

President of WinsCo Enterprises Inc

Former Interim CEO, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.

Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

Former Senior Vice President and CFO of Giant Eagle, Inc.

Former President of WinsCo Financial LLC

Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Scholastic Corporation

Other Board Experience:

Director of Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Chipotle Mexican Grill, and Acuity Brands, Inc.

Former Director of Domtar Corporation, SUPERVALU INC., and Plexus Corporation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH

OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 1922


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Board Oversight and Governance Practices

Our Board is responsible for, and committed to, overseeing our long-term strategic development as well as managing the principal and most significant risks that we face. In carrying out this duty, our Board advises senior management to help drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. The Board delegates specific areas of responsibility to relevant Board committees, as detailed below under the heading “Overview of Committee Responsibilities”, who report on their deliberations to the Board. The following summarizes our Board’s key areas of oversight responsibility.

Board Oversight

 

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

Long-Term

Business Strategy

 

•   One of the primary responsibilities of our Board is theoversight of management’s long-term strategy and planning. Accordingly, our Board maintains a deep level of engagement with management in setting and overseeing Dover’s long-term business strategy.

 

•   The Apergyspin-off in May 2018 was theculmination of a comprehensive process publicly announced in September 2017to determine the best separation alternatives to maximize shareholder value.

•   Following thespin-off, our remaining portfolio is well-positioned forlong-term sustainable growth and returns with less cyclicality.

Capital Allocation 

•   Our Board is focused on theefficient allocation of capital to drive growth and provide returns to our shareholders.shareholders. Our capital allocation priorities are organic investments, strategic acquisitions, and the return of capital to our shareholders.

 

•   We consistentlyreturn cash to shareholders by payingdividends, whichhave increased annually over each of the last 6366 years.

 

•   We also undertake opportunistic share repurchases as part of our capital allocation strategy, includingcompleting $1 billion21.6 million of share repurchases completed in 20182021 and $106.3 million in 2020.

•   We made $171.5 million in capital expenditures in 2021, representing 2.2% of revenue, and $165.7 million in capital expenditures in 2020, representing 2.5% of revenue, in line with our priority of organic reinvestment to grow and strengthen our existing businesses.

 

•   We employ aprudent financial policy to support our capital allocation strategy, which includes maintaining aniinvestmentnvestment grade credit rating.

 

Portfolio

Management

 

•   Businesses in our portfolio are continually evaluated forstrategic fit.

•   We seek to deploy capital in acquisitions in attractive growth areas across our five segments. We focus primarily on bolt-on acquisitions, applying strict selection criteria of market attractiveness (including growth, market landscape, and performance-based competition), business fit (including sustained leading position, revenue visibility, and favorable customer value-add versus switching cost or risk) and financial return profile (accretive growth and margins and double-digit return on invested capital).

•   We have sold or divested some of our acquisitions are targetedbusinesses based on changes in specific market outlook, structural changes in financial performance, value-creation potential, or for other strategic considerations, which included an effort to reduce our keyexposure to cyclical markets or focus on our higher margin growth markets which include printingspaces.

•   In recognition of recent portfolio changes, we recently changed the name of the Fueling Solutions segment to “Clean Energy & Fueling,” and identification, refrigerationthe Refrigeration & Food Equipment segment to “Climate & Sustainability Technologies” to better reflect the markets and food equipment, pumps, fueling and transport, hygienic and pharma and select energy markets.customers served by the businesses within these segments.

 

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 23


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 
KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

Risk
Management

 

•   Our Board has established acomprehensive enterprise risk management process to identify and manage risks, and periodically reviews the processes established by management to identify and manage risks andcommunicates with management about these processes.

 

•   We have established a risk assessment team consisting of senior executives, which annually, with the assistance of a consultant, oversees a risk assessment made at the corporate center, segment and operating company levels and, with that information in mind, performs an assessment of the overall risks our company may face.face and reports to the Board on that assessment. Each quarter, this team reassesses the risks, at the Dover level, the severity of these risks, and the status of efforts to mitigate them andreports to the Board on that reassessment.them.

 

  Sustainability

ESG

 

•   As part of itsThe full Board has oversight of risk management,our Board reviews any material risks related to environmental and social issuesESG matters.

•   Our Board receives periodic updates oncompany-wide energy and carbon performance against targets, and is regularly briefed on each segment’sproductivitystrategic planning, risks, and safety metricsopportunities related to ESG by senior management, including our CEO.

•   Our Compensation Committee has integrated ESG oversight responsibility into our CEO’s individual strategic objectives. within the AIP.

 

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 20


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

Culture & Human
Capital
Management
 

•   Our entrepreneurial culture depends upon an inclusive approach that values employees’ diversity and contributions.

•   We fosteran operating culture with high ethical standards that values accountability, rigor, trust, inclusion, respect, and open communication and is designed to encourage individual growth and operational effectiveness. We continue to make significant investments in talent development, especiallyincluding in the areaareas of digital applications and operational management, andrecognize that the growth and development of our employees is essential for our continued success.

 

•   As part of our commitment to strong corporate governance practices,we maintain an active and robust ethics program. Our Code of Business Conduct & Business Ethics (“Code of Conduct”) applies to all employees and directors of Dover and its subsidiaries. We enforce our Code of Conduct fairly and consistently, regardless of one’s position in Dover, andwill not tolerate retaliation against those who report suspected misconduct in good faith.

 

Succession
Planning
 

•   Another of the Board’s primary responsibilities isoverseeing a sound Board and management succession process. The Board has developed acomprehensive plan to address management succession — both over the long term and for emergency purposes. The framework for the long-term plan includes thoughtful, deliberate monitoring of management beyond our top executives to ensure Dover continues to build a deep internal bench of talent.

 

•   Therecent appointment of Mr. Tobin as our new President and CEO in May 2018 was the result of ourBoard’s active engagement in a thoughtful and comprehensive succession planning process.

•   Our Board is also focused on itsown succession plan, which drives not only our director selection efforts, but also how we approach Board and committee leadership structure and membership, with afocus on critical board skills, diversity, and independence.

 

Cybersecurity 

•   The full Board is briefed on enterprise-widecybersecurity risk management and the overall cybersecurity risk environment, and oversees major tasks related to cybersecurity risk management, periodically reviews our response capabilities, and meets with the Chief Information Security Officer on at least an annual basis.

 

•   Dover employs the National Institute of Standards & Technology Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (The NIST Framework). This voluntary guidance developed with much private sector input provides a framework and a toolkit for organizations to manage cybersecurity risk.

 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 2124


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Board Committees

Our Board has four standing committees — the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Finance Committee. The table below sets forth a summary of our committee structure and membership information.

     

 DIRECTOR

  Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Governance

and

Nominating
Committee

 Finance

Committee

 DEBORAH L. DEHAAS

     

 H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR.

  

   

 KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM

   

 

 

 MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON

     

 ERIC A. SPIEGEL

      (Chair)

 RICHARD J. TOBIN

     

 STEPHEN M. TODD

  

 (Chair)

   

 STEPHEN K. WAGNER

     (Chair) 

 KEITH E. WANDELL

   

 (Chair)

  

 MARY A. WINSTON

   

  

 MEETINGS HELD IN 2021

  8 

5

 4 

9

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 25


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Overview of Committee Responsibilities

Audit Committee

    Stephen M. Todd (Chair)    

    Deborah L. DeHaas

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Eric A. Spiegel

    Stephen K. Wagner

Key Responsibilities

•  Selecting and engaging our independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditors”)

•  Overseeing the work of our independent auditors and our internal audit function

•  Approving in advance all services to be provided by, and all fees to be paid to, our independent auditors, who report directly to the committee

•  Reviewing with management and the independent auditors the audit plan and results of the auditing engagement

•  Reviewing with management and our independent auditors the quality and adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting

The Audit Committee holds regular quarterly meetings at which it meets separately with each of our independent registered public accounting firm, PwC, our internal audit function, financial management and our general counsel to assess certain matters including the status of the independent audit process, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the operation and effectiveness of our compliance program. In addition, the Audit Committee, as a whole, reviews and meets to discuss the contents of each Form 10-Q and Form 10-K (including the financial statements) prior to its filing with the SEC.

Our Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the SEC rules.

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

Compensation Committee

    Keith E. Wandell (Chair)     

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

The Compensation Committee, together with our independent directors, approves compensation for the CEO of Dover. The functions of the Compensation Committee also include:

•  Approving compensation for executive officers who report directly to the CEO (together with the CEO, “senior executive officers”)

•  Granting awards and approving payouts under our 2012 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2012 LTIP”), our 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2021 LTIP”). and our AIP

•  Approving changes to our executive compensation plans

•  Reviewing and recommending compensation for the Board

•  Overseeing succession planning and management development programs

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 26


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Governance and Nominating Committee

    Stephen K. Wagner (Chair)

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

Key Responsibilities

•  Developing and recommending corporate governance principles to our Board

•  Annually reviewing the requisite skills and characteristics of board members as well as the size, composition, functioning and needs of our Board as a whole

•  Considering and recommending to the Board nominees for election to, or for filling any vacancy on, our Board in accordance with our by-laws, our governance guidelines, and the committee’s charter

•  Identifying and recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in the size and composition of our Board

•  Recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in structure and membership of our Board’s committees

•  Providing oversight of Dover’s practices on political contributions and lobbying expenses and reviewing annually Dover’s political contributions and lobbying expenses

The Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

Finance Committee

    Eric A. Spiegel (Chair)       

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Keith E. Wandell

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

•  Reviewing and recommending for approval by the Board proposed changes to dividend policies, stock splits, and repurchase programs

•  Reviewing our capital structure, liquidity, and financing plans

•  Reviewing and approving the registration and issuance of debt or equity securities

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, capital expenditures

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, M&A transactions

•  Oversight of treasury, insurance, and tax planning matters

The Finance Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 27


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Corporate Governance

Our Board is committed to sound governance practices and regularly reviews and refines our profile to reflect evolving best practices and matters raised by our shareholders. The following summarizes key aspects of our governance framework.

 

 

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Independent Chair/Directors

Independent

Board of Directors

 

• We have an independent Chair and allAll directors are independent, other than our CEO.

CEO, and our Board has leadership that is independent from management, by way of an independent Chair.

New Finance CommitteeCommitment to Diversity 

• In 2020, our Board adopted a policy reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines requiring that the initial list of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity.

Special
Shareholder
Meetings

• In 2020, we amended our by-laws to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting of shareholders to 15% or more of the voting power of our outstanding stock from 25%.

Elimination of
Super-majority Provisions

• All of the supermajority voting provisions in our charter were eliminated in 2019.

Board Committee Refreshment

• Our Board established a new Finance Committee comprised of independent directors in 2018.

•   The Finance Committee assists the Board in overseeing policies, practices, strategies, and risks relating to our financial affairs, including with respect to capital allocation matters such as share repurchases, dividend policy, capital expenditures and M&A, as well as global treasury activities, insured risk management, and tax planning.

Board Committee Refreshment

•   Our Board periodically reviews committee composition and chair positions, seeking the appropriate blend of continuity and fresh perspectives on committees.

•   In addition to establishing a new Finance Committee, we refreshed the composition of our standing committees in 2018, including appointing new Chairs for the Audit and Compensation Committees.

Annual Majority
Vote Director
Elections &
Mandatory
Resignation Policy
 

• All of our directors are elected annually by our shareholders.

 

• Our directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections to be elected.

 

• We have a director resignation policy that requires a current director to tender his or heran irrevocable resignation letter to the Board if he or she doesprior to being nominated, contingent on the director not receivereceiving a majority of the votes cast.cast in an uncontested election and the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. The Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the full Board whether to accept the resignation or whether to take other action.

Proxy Access 

• Ourby-laws permit a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in ourby-laws.

Special Shareholder Meetings

•   Ourby-laws provide that shareholders who hold 25% or more of our outstanding stock may call a special meeting of shareholders.

Elimination of
Super-majority Provisions

•   We amended our charter to eliminate the super-majority voting provision applicable to business combinations with related persons.

•   At this Annual Meeting, the Board is recommending to shareholders that they approve the Board’s proposals to amend our charter to remove our remaining super-majority voting provisions.

 

Board Leadership Structure

We believe that having an independent leader of the Board is important to the Board’s oversight role and decision-making involving corporate strategy, performance, succession, and other critical matters. Under our current Board

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 22


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

leadership structure, our Board has leadership that is independent from management by way of an independent Chair. Our CEO is also a member of the Board as a management representative. We believe this is important to make information and insight directly available to the directors in their deliberations. In our view, this board leadership structure gives us an appropriate, well-functioning balance betweennon-management and management directors that combines experience, accountability and effective risk oversight.

Board, Committee and Individual Director Evaluations

Our Board and its committees conduct robust annual self-evaluations of their performance. In addition, our Board evaluatesone-third of our directors on a rotating individual basis each year with the purpose of assisting each director to be a more effective member of the Board. New directors undergo the evaluation process in each of their first two years on the Board. Our directors believe the rotational nature of our evaluation process enables a morein-depth, comprehensive evaluation for each of our directors.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 28


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Directors’ Meetings and Attendance

During 2018,2021, the Board met 8seven times. No director attended less than 75% of the board and standing committee meetings held while he or she was a member of the Board and relevant standing committee. Average board attendance was over 95%97% in 2018.2021. Our independent directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions at least quarterly without management representatives ornon-independent directors present. The Chair of the Board presides at these sessions. We expect our directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors then on the Board attended the 20182021 Annual Meeting.

Our directors also regularly engage with management and outside subject matter experts outside of formal meetings. Examples include developing agendas and reviewing the content of materials in advance of meetings, calls, orin-person meetings with members of management to prepare for meetings, receiving periodic updates from management on significant operational or strategic developments between meetings, and, from time to time, engaging with shareholders.

Management Meetings and Site Visits

We encourage our directors to meet with senior managers throughout the enterprise and attend management’s strategic planning sessions. When considering businesses to visit, priority goes to those businesses identified as strategically important as well as those that were recently acquired. From time to time, the Board makeson-site visits to our businesses to tour the manufacturing facilities and meetface-to-face with company management and employees. These visits serve as an important tool in the Board’s succession planning process for our senior leadership team and enable a deeper understanding of our businesses and our culture. In 2021, these types of opportunities for engagement were largely conducted virtually rather than in-person.

Director Orientation and Education

All new directors participate in our director orientation program. New directors meetin-person with senior corporate and segment leaders to review and discuss our businesses, operations, strategy, end markets, governance, internal controls, and culture. We believe that ouron-boarding approach, coupled with participation in regular Board and committee meetings, as well as additional exposure to our business through participation in management meetings and site visits, whether virtually or in-person, provides new directors a strong foundation in our businesses and accelerates their effectiveness to fully engage in Board deliberations.

Our Board also encourages directors to participate annually participate in continuing director education programs outside of the Boardroom, and we reimburse directors for their expenses associated with this participation.

Director IndependenceOverview of Committee Responsibilities

Our Board has determined that each of the current members of the Board, except for Richard J. Tobin, who is our CEO, has no material relationship with Dover and satisfies all the criteria for being “independent” members of our Board. This includes the criteria established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New

Audit Committee

    Stephen M. Todd (Chair)    

    Deborah L. DeHaas

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Eric A. Spiegel

    Stephen K. Wagner

Key Responsibilities

•  Selecting and engaging our independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditors”)

•  Overseeing the work of our independent auditors and our internal audit function

•  Approving in advance all services to be provided by, and all fees to be paid to, our independent auditors, who report directly to the committee

•  Reviewing with management and the independent auditors the audit plan and results of the auditing engagement

•  Reviewing with management and our independent auditors the quality and adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting

The Audit Committee holds regular quarterly meetings at which it meets separately with each of our independent registered public accounting firm, PwC, our internal audit function, financial management and our general counsel to assess certain matters including the status of the independent audit process, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the operation and effectiveness of our compliance program. In addition, the Audit Committee, as a whole, reviews and meets to discuss the contents of each Form 10-Q and Form 10-K (including the financial statements) prior to its filing with the SEC.

Our Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the SEC rules.

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

Compensation Committee

    Keith E. Wandell (Chair)     

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

The Compensation Committee, together with our independent directors, approves compensation for the CEO of Dover. The functions of the Compensation Committee also include:

•  Approving compensation for executive officers who report directly to the CEO (together with the CEO, “senior executive officers”)

•  Granting awards and approving payouts under our 2012 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2012 LTIP”), our 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2021 LTIP”). and our AIP

•  Approving changes to our executive compensation plans

•  Reviewing and recommending compensation for the Board

•  Overseeing succession planning and management development programs

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 2326


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Governance and Nominating Committee

    Stephen K. Wagner (Chair)

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

Key Responsibilities

•  Developing and recommending corporate governance principles to our Board

•  Annually reviewing the requisite skills and characteristics of board members as well as the size, composition, functioning and needs of our Board as a whole

•  Considering and recommending to the Board nominees for election to, or for filling any vacancy on, our Board in accordance with our by-laws, our governance guidelines, and the committee’s charter

•  Identifying and recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in the size and composition of our Board

•  Recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in structure and membership of our Board’s committees

•  Providing oversight of Dover’s practices on political contributions and lobbying expenses and reviewing annually Dover’s political contributions and lobbying expenses

The Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards, as well as our standards for classification as an independent director which are available on our website at www.dovercorporation.com. Our Board makes an annual determination of the independence of each nominee for director prior to his or her nomination forre-election. No director may be deemed independent unless the Board determines that he or she has no material relationship with Dover, directly or as an officer, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a material relationship with Dover.

Majority Standard for Election of Directors and Mandatory Resignation Policy

Finance Committee

Under ourby-laws and corporate governance guidelines, the voting standard in director elections is a majority of the votes cast. Under the majority standard, a director must receive more votes in favor of his or her election than votes against his or her election. Abstentions and brokernon-votes do not count as votes cast with respect to a director’s election. In contested director elections (where there are more nominees than available seats on the board), the plurality standard will apply.

For an incumbent director to be nominated forre-election, he or she must submit an irrevocable resignation letter. The resignation will be contingent on the nominee not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and on the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. If an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, the Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to our Board concerning the resignation. Our Board will act on the resignation within 90 days following certification of the election results, taking into account the committee’s recommendation. The Board will publicly announce its decision and, if the resignation is rejected, the rationale for its decision.

Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics

Our Board long ago adopted written corporate governance guidelines that set forth the responsibilities of our Board and the qualifications and independence of its members and the members of its standing committees. The Board reviews these guidelines at least annually, in light of evolving best practices, shareholder feedback and the evolution of our business. In addition, our Board has a long-standing code of business conduct and ethics setting forth standards applicable to all of our companies and their employees, a code of ethics for our CEO and senior financial officers, and charters for each of its standing committees. All of these documents (referred to collectively as “governance materials”) are available on our website at www.dovercorporation.com.

Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions

We generally do not engage in transactions in which our senior executive officers or directors, any of their immediate family members or any of our 5% shareholders have a material interest. Should a proposed transaction or series of similar transactions involve any such persons and an amount that exceeds $120,000, it would be subject to review and approval by the Governance and Nominating Committee in accordance with a written policy and the procedures adopted by our Board, which are available with the governance materials on our website.

Under the procedures, management determines whether a proposed transaction requires review under the policy and, if so, presents the transaction to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction and approves or rejects the transaction. If the proposed transaction is immaterial or it is impractical or undesirable to defer the proposed transaction until the next committee meeting, the Chair of the committee decides whether to (i) approve the transaction and report the transaction at the next meeting or (ii) call a special meeting of the committee to review and approve the transaction. Should the proposed transaction involve the CEO or enough members of the Governance and Nominating Committee to prevent a quorum, the disinterested members of the committee will review the transaction and make a recommendation to the Board, and the disinterested members of the Board will then approve or reject the transaction. No director may participate in the review of any transaction in which he or she is a related person.

    Eric A. Spiegel (Chair)       

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Keith E. Wandell

    Mary A. Winston

Key Responsibilities

•  Reviewing and recommending for approval by the Board proposed changes to dividend policies, stock splits, and repurchase programs

•  Reviewing our capital structure, liquidity, and financing plans

•  Reviewing and approving the registration and issuance of debt or equity securities

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, capital expenditures

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, M&A transactions

•  Oversight of treasury, insurance, and tax planning matters

The Finance Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 2427


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Communication with Directors

The Audit Committee has established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters (“accounting matters”), and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting matters. Such complaints or concerns may be submitted to Dover, care of our Corporate Secretary or through the communications coordinator, an external service provider, by mail, fax, telephone, or via the internet as published on our website. The communications coordinator forwards such communications to Dover without disclosing the identity of the sender if anonymity is requested.

Shareholders and other interested persons may also communicate with our Board and thenon-management directors in any of these same manners. Such communications are forwarded to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee.

Board Committees

Our Board has four standing committees — the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governanceis committed to sound governance practices and Nominating Committee,regularly reviews and the Finance Committee.refines our profile to reflect evolving best practices and matters raised by our shareholders. The table below sets forth a summaryfollowing summarizes key aspects of our committee structure and membership information.governance framework.

     
 DIRECTOR  Audit
Committee
  Compensation
Committee
  

Governance

and

Nominating
Committee

  

Finance

Committee

 PETER T. FRANCIS*

    

    

 H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR.

  

      

 KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM

    

  

  

 MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON

    

  

  

 RICHARD K. LOCHRIDGE*

    

    

 ERIC A. SPIEGEL

  

      

(Chair)

 RICHARD J. TOBIN

        

 STEPHEN M. TODD

  

(Chair)

      

 STEPHEN K. WAGNER

  

    

 (Chair)

  

 KEITH E. WANDELL

    

(Chair)

    

 MARY A. WINSTON

    

    

 MEETINGS IN 2018

  

9

  

7

  

4

  

4

 

*

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Independent

Board of Directors

Messrs. Francis

• All directors are independent, other than our CEO, and Lochridgeour Board has leadership that is independent from management, by way of an independent Chair.

Commitment to Diversity

• In 2020, our Board adopted a policy reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines requiring that the initial list of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity.

Special
Shareholder
Meetings

• In 2020, we amended our by-laws to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting of shareholders to 15% or more of the voting power of our outstanding stock from 25%.

Elimination of
Super-majority Provisions

• All of the supermajority voting provisions in our charter were eliminated in 2019.

Board Committee Refreshment

• Our Board periodically reviews committee composition and chair positions, seeking the appropriate blend of continuity and fresh perspectives on committees.

Annual Majority
Vote Director
Elections &
Mandatory
Resignation Policy

• All of our directors are not standing forre-electionelected annually and will retire fromby our shareholders.

• Our directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections to be elected.

• We have a director resignation policy that requires a director to tender an irrevocable resignation letter to the Board effective asprior to being nominated, contingent on the director not receiving a majority of the Annual Meeting, at which timevotes cast in an uncontested election and the sizeBoard’s acceptance of the resignation. The Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the full Board whether to accept the resignation or whether to take other action.

Proxy Access

• Our by-laws permit a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, will be reduced to 9 members.provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our by-laws.

Board Leadership Structure

We believe that having an independent leader of the Board is important to the Board’s oversight role and decision-making involving corporate strategy, performance, succession, and other critical matters. Under our current Board leadership structure, our Board has leadership that is independent from management by way of an independent Chair. Our CEO is also a member of the Board as a management representative. We believe this is important to make information and insight directly available to the directors in their deliberations. In our view, this board leadership structure gives us an appropriate, well-functioning balance between non-management and management directors that combines experience, accountability and effective risk oversight.

Board, Committee and Individual Director Evaluations

Our Board and its committees conduct robust annual self-evaluations of their performance. In addition, our Board evaluates one-third of our directors on a rotating individual basis each year with the purpose of assisting each director to be a more effective member of the Board. New directors undergo the evaluation process in each of their first two years on the Board. Our directors believe the rotational nature of our evaluation process enables a more in-depth, comprehensive evaluation for each of our directors.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 2528


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Directors’ Meetings and Attendance

During 2021, the Board met seven times. No director attended less than 75% of the board and standing committee meetings held while he or she was a member of the Board and relevant standing committee. Average board attendance was over 97% in 2021. Our independent directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions at least quarterly without management representatives or non-independent directors present. The Chair of the Board presides at these sessions. We expect our directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.

Our directors also regularly engage with management and outside subject matter experts outside of formal meetings. Examples include developing agendas and reviewing the content of materials in advance of meetings, calls, or in-person meetings with members of management to prepare for meetings, receiving periodic updates from management on significant operational or strategic developments between meetings, and, from time to time, engaging with shareholders.

Management Meetings and Site Visits

We encourage our directors to meet with senior managers throughout the enterprise and attend management’s strategic planning sessions. When considering businesses to visit, priority goes to those businesses identified as strategically important as well as those that were recently acquired. From time to time, the Board makes on-site visits to our businesses to tour the manufacturing facilities and meet face-to-face with company management and employees. These visits serve as an important tool in the Board’s succession planning process for our senior leadership team and enable a deeper understanding of our businesses and our culture. In 2021, these types of opportunities for engagement were largely conducted virtually rather than in-person.

Director Orientation and Education

All new directors participate in our director orientation program. New directors meet with senior corporate leaders to review and discuss our businesses, operations, strategy, end markets, governance, internal controls, and culture. We believe that our on-boarding approach, coupled with participation in regular Board and committee meetings, as well as additional exposure to our business through participation in management meetings and site visits, whether virtually or in-person, provides new directors a strong foundation in our businesses and accelerates their effectiveness to fully engage in Board deliberations.

Our Board also encourages directors to participate annually in continuing director education programs outside of the Boardroom, and we reimburse directors for their expenses associated with this participation.

Overview of Committee Responsibilities

 

Audit Committee

    LOGO

 

    Stephen M. Todd (Chair)

 

    Deborah L. DeHaas

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Eric A. Spiegel

    Stephen K. Wagner

 

 

Key Responsibilities

 

•  Selecting and engaging our independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditors”)

 

•  Overseeing the work of our independent auditors and our internal audit function

 

•  Approving in advance all services to be provided by, and all fees to be paid to, our independent auditors, who report directly to the committee

 

•  Reviewing with management and the independent auditors the audit plan and results of the auditing engagement

 

•  Reviewing with management and our independent auditors the quality and adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting

 

The Audit Committee holds regular quarterly meetings at which it meets separately with each of our independent registered public accounting firm, PwC, our internal audit function, financial management and our general counsel to assess certain matters including the status of the independent audit process, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the operation and effectiveness of our compliance program. In addition, the Audit Committee, as a whole, reviews and meets to discuss the contents of each Form10-Q and Form10-K (including the financial statements) prior to its filing with the SEC.

 

Our Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the SEC rules.

 

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

 

 

Compensation Committee

    LOGO

 

    Keith E. Wandell (Chair)

 

  Peter T. Francis

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

  Richard K. Lochridge

    Mary A. Winston

 

 

 

Key Responsibilities

 

The Compensation Committee, together with our independent directors, approves compensation for the CEO of Dover. The functions of the Compensation Committee also include:

 

•  Approving compensation for executive officers who report directly to the CEO (together with the CEO, “senior executive officers”)

 

•  Granting awards and approving payouts under our 2012 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”“2012 LTIP”) and, our Executive Officer Annual2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “AIP”“2021 LTIP”). and our AIP

 

•  Approving changes to our executive compensation plans

 

•  Reviewing and recommending compensation for the Board

 

•  Overseeing succession planning and management development programs

 

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 26


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Governance and Nominating Committee

    LOGO

 

    Stephen K. Wagner (Chair)

 

    Kristiane C. Graham

    Michael F. Johnston

 

 

Key Responsibilities

 

•  Developing and recommending corporate governance principles to our Board

 

•  Annually reviewing the requisite skills and characteristics of board members as well as the size, composition, functioning and needs of our Board as a whole

 

•  Considering and recommending to the Board nominees for election to, or for filling any vacancy on, our Board in accordance with ourby-laws, our governance guidelines, and the committee’s charter

 

•  Identifying and recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in the size and composition of our Board

 

•  Recommending to our Board any changes it believes desirable in structure and membership of our Board’s committees

 

•  Providing oversight of Dover’s practices on political contributions and lobbying expenses and reviewing annually Dover’s political contributions and lobbying expenses

The Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

 

 

Finance Committee

    LOGO

 

    Eric A. Spiegel (Chair)

 

  Peter T. Francis

    H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

    Keith E. Wandell

    Mary A. Winston

 

 

Key Responsibilities

 

•  Reviewing and recommending for approval by the Board proposed changes to dividend policies, stock splits, and repurchase programs

 

•  Reviewing our capital structure, liquidity, and financing plans

 

•  Reviewing and recommending for Board approvalapproving the registration and issuance of debt or equity securities

 

•  Subject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, capital expenditures

 

•  ReviewingSubject to thresholds determined from time to time by the Board, reviewing and approving, or reviewing and recommending for Board approval, capital expenditures and M&A transactions

 

•  Oversight of treasury, insurance, and tax planning matters.matters

 

The Finance Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described in greater detail in its written charter.

 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 27


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Corporate Governance

Our Board is committed to sound governance practices and regularly reviews and refines our profile to reflect evolving best practices and matters raised by our shareholders. The following summarizes key aspects of our governance framework.

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Independent

Board of Directors

• All directors are independent, other than our CEO, and our Board has leadership that is independent from management, by way of an independent Chair.

Commitment to Diversity

• In 2020, our Board adopted a policy reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines requiring that the initial list of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity.

Special
Shareholder
Meetings

• In 2020, we amended our by-laws to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting of shareholders to 15% or more of the voting power of our outstanding stock from 25%.

Elimination of
Super-majority Provisions

• All of the supermajority voting provisions in our charter were eliminated in 2019.

Board Committee Refreshment

• Our Board periodically reviews committee composition and chair positions, seeking the appropriate blend of continuity and fresh perspectives on committees.

Annual Majority
Vote Director
Elections &
Mandatory
Resignation Policy

• All of our directors are elected annually by our shareholders.

• Our directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections to be elected.

• We have a director resignation policy that requires a director to tender an irrevocable resignation letter to the Board prior to being nominated, contingent on the director not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. The Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the full Board whether to accept the resignation or whether to take other action.

Proxy Access

• Our by-laws permit a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our by-laws.

Board Leadership Structure

We believe that having an independent leader of the Board is important to the Board’s oversight role and decision-making involving corporate strategy, performance, succession, and other critical matters. Under our current Board leadership structure, our Board has leadership that is independent from management by way of an independent Chair. Our CEO is also a member of the Board as a management representative. We believe this is important to make information and insight directly available to the directors in their deliberations. In our view, this board leadership structure gives us an appropriate, well-functioning balance between non-management and management directors that combines experience, accountability and effective risk oversight.

Board, Committee and Individual Director Evaluations

Our Board and its committees conduct robust annual self-evaluations of their performance. In addition, our Board evaluates one-third of our directors on a rotating individual basis each year with the purpose of assisting each director to be a more effective member of the Board. New directors undergo the evaluation process in each of their first two years on the Board. Our directors believe the rotational nature of our evaluation process enables a more in-depth, comprehensive evaluation for each of our directors.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 28


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Directors’ Meetings and Attendance

During 2021, the Board met seven times. No director attended less than 75% of the board and standing committee meetings held while he or she was a member of the Board and relevant standing committee. Average board attendance was over 97% in 2021. Our independent directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions at least quarterly without management representatives or non-independent directors present. The Chair of the Board presides at these sessions. We expect our directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.

Our directors also regularly engage with management and outside subject matter experts outside of formal meetings. Examples include developing agendas and reviewing the content of materials in advance of meetings, calls, or in-person meetings with members of management to prepare for meetings, receiving periodic updates from management on significant operational or strategic developments between meetings, and, from time to time, engaging with shareholders.

Management Meetings and Site Visits

We encourage our directors to meet with senior managers throughout the enterprise and attend management’s strategic planning sessions. When considering businesses to visit, priority goes to those businesses identified as strategically important as well as those that were recently acquired. From time to time, the Board makes on-site visits to our businesses to tour the manufacturing facilities and meet face-to-face with company management and employees. These visits serve as an important tool in the Board’s succession planning process for our senior leadership team and enable a deeper understanding of our businesses and our culture. In 2021, these types of opportunities for engagement were largely conducted virtually rather than in-person.

Director Orientation and Education

All new directors participate in our director orientation program. New directors meet with senior corporate leaders to review and discuss our businesses, operations, strategy, end markets, governance, internal controls, and culture. We believe that our on-boarding approach, coupled with participation in regular Board and committee meetings, as well as additional exposure to our business through participation in management meetings and site visits, whether virtually or in-person, provides new directors a strong foundation in our businesses and accelerates their effectiveness to fully engage in Board deliberations.

Our Board also encourages directors to participate annually in continuing director education programs outside of the Boardroom, and we reimburse directors for their expenses associated with this participation.

Director Independence

Our Board has determined that each of the current members of the Board, except for Richard J. Tobin, who is our CEO, has no material relationship with Dover and satisfies all the criteria for being “independent” members of our Board. This includes the criteria established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards, as well as our standards for classification as an independent director which are available on our website at www.dovercorporation.com. Our Board makes an annual determination of the independence of each nominee for director prior to his or her nomination for re-election. No director may be deemed independent unless the Board determines that he or she has no material relationship with Dover, directly or as an officer, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a material relationship with Dover.

Majority Standard for Election of Directors and Mandatory Resignation Policy

Under our by-laws and corporate governance guidelines, the voting standard in director elections is a majority of the votes cast. Under this majority of the votes cast standard, a director must receive more votes in favor of his or her election than votes against his or her election. Abstentions and broker non-votes do not count as votes cast with respect to a director’s election. In contested director elections (where there are more nominees than available seats on the board), the plurality standard will apply. Under the plurality standard, the nominees who receive the most “for” votes are elected to the Board until all seats are filled.

For an incumbent director to be nominated for re-election, he or she must submit an irrevocable resignation letter. The resignation will be contingent on the nominee not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and on the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. If an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 29


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

election, the Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to our Board concerning whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. Our Board will act on the resignation within 90 days following certification of the election results, taking into account the committee’s recommendation. The Board will publicly announce its decision and, if the resignation is rejected, the rationale for its decision.

Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics

Our Board long ago adopted written corporate governance guidelines that set forth the responsibilities of our Board and the qualifications and independence of its members and the members of its standing committees. The Board reviews these guidelines at least annually, in light of evolving best practices, shareholder feedback and the evolution of our business. In 2020, the Board amended the guidelines to require that initial lists of potential director and external CEO candidates presented by third-party search firms include qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race or ethnicity. In addition, our Board has a long-standing Code of Conduct setting forth standards applicable to all of our companies and their employees, a code of ethics for our CEO and senior financial officers, and charters for each of its standing committees. All of these documents (referred to collectively as “governance materials”) are available on our website at www.dovercorporation.com.

Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions

We generally do not engage in transactions in which our senior executive officers or directors, any of their immediate family members or any of our 5% shareholders have a material interest. Should a proposed transaction or series of similar transactions involve any such persons and an amount that exceeds $120,000, it would be subject to review and approval by the Governance and Nominating Committee in accordance with a written policy and the procedures adopted by our Board, which are available with the governance materials on our website.

Under the procedures, management determines whether a proposed transaction requires review under the policy and, if so, presents the transaction to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction and approves or rejects the transaction. If the proposed transaction is immaterial or it is impractical or undesirable to defer the proposed transaction until the next committee meeting, the Chair of the committee decides whether to (i) approve the transaction and report the transaction at the next meeting or (ii) call a special meeting of the committee to review and approve the transaction. Should the proposed transaction involve the CEO or enough members of the Governance and Nominating Committee to prevent a quorum, the disinterested members of the committee will review the transaction and make a recommendation to the Board, and the disinterested members of the Board will then approve or reject the transaction. No director may participate in the review of any transaction in which he or she is a related person.

Communication with Directors

The Audit Committee has established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters (“accounting matters”) and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting matters. Such complaints or concerns may be submitted to Dover, care of our Corporate Secretary or through the communications coordinator, an external service provider, by mail, fax, telephone, or via the internet as published on our website. The communications coordinator forwards such communications to Dover without disclosing the identity of the sender if anonymity is requested.

Shareholders and other interested persons may also communicate with our Board and the non-management directors in any of these same manners. Such communications are forwarded to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 30


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Shareholder Engagement and History of Board Responsiveness

AnnualShareholder Engagement Program

In 2018,2021, we continued our focus on regularly engaging with our shareholders. We reached out to holders of over 51%approximately 60% of our shares outstanding, and engaged with governance professionals andand/or portfolio managers at investors holding 32%approximately 31% of our shares outstanding. Our stockholdershareholder engagement team consists of senior management from our Legal, Human Resources, and Investor Relations departments and has also included our Chair from time to time. Members of our engagement teamWe also participate in various governance forums with our shareholders and regularly engage with shareholders through industry conferences and meetings.

Our Board continuesWe received feedback from investors on a range of topics, including corporate governance topics such as the right of shareholders to findact by written consent. We are pleased with the feedback it receives from these discussionswe received with investors on the topics we discussed, and look forward to be invaluable. We planongoing engagement with our shareholders in order to continue to incorporate their views into our program of proactive, regular engagementBoard’s decision-making process. We aim to further deepen our relationship with our investors.

LOGO

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 28


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

have Shareholder Engagement in 2018best-in-class governance and compensation structures at Dover.

 

Key Items of Discussion and FeedbackKEY ITEMS OF DISCUSSION AND FEEDBACK

  

  Long-Term

Performance &

Long-Term

Strategy

  

•   We discussedreviewed our portfolio of businesses, performance, strategic priorities, and focus on continuing to deliver long-term value to shareholders despite a challenging operating environment caused by the recently completedspin-offCOVID-19 of Apergy, which represented the culmination of a comprehensive process led by our Board to determine the best separation alternatives to maximize shareholder value.

•   We also reviewed our Board’s commitment to margin improvement, long-term investment in the business, and operational excellence.

  CEO Transition

•   We discussed the robust succession planning process, led by our independent Chair and the independent Chair of our Governance and Nominating Committee, which resulted in the appointment of our new President and CEO, Richard J. Tobin, in May 2018.

•   Shareholders were supportive of the structure of Mr. Tobin’s performance-based compensation as well as his employment agreement, including the make-whole payment which ensured a smooth transition and our ability to hire a highly qualified candidate.

  Capital Allocation

•   We discussed our Board’s capital allocation priorities — invest organically, acquire strategically, and return capital to shareholders.

pandemic.

  

Capital Allocation

•   We discussed how our   Corporatebalance sheet strength and history of prudent capital allocation served as differentiating factors that allowed us to remain flexible during the market dislocation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Diversity &

Inclusion

•   We discussed how we are taking a thoughtful approach to developing a center-led approach to human capital management and diversity and inclusion.

•   Shareholders expressed appreciation for the new transparency on the sustainability portion of our website regarding workforce demographics (gender, ethnicity, age).

•   We also discussed the diversity & inclusion goals we set in 2021 related to conducting an engagement survey to establish a baseline measure of inclusivity, and implementing unconscious bias training for employees with direct reports.

ESG

•   We discussed ESG program, including our recently announced goals to reduce our GHG emissions by 2030,the results of our climate risk assessment and scenario analysis aligned with the TCFD reporting framework, the extensive disclosures available on the sustainability portion of our website, and our SASB and GRI-aligned disclosures.

•   We also discussed that, in 2022, we plan to continue to make progress in several key priority areas in line with our three-year plan to expand the scope and robustness of our ESG practices and disclosures.

Executive

Compensation

•   Shareholders expressed strong support for the meaningful changes implemented to our executive compensation program in 2020. They expressed appreciation for the additional detail presented in our proxy statement regarding the weighting, nature and performance outcomes for the individual strategic objectives in our AIP, as well as improved disclosure regarding the threshold, target and maximum levels for the financial goals in our AIP. For LTIP awards made in 2020, they also supported the increase in the proportion of awards dedicated to performance shares and the shift to relative TSR from internal TSR as the performance metric for performance shares. In addition, shareholders expressed support for continuing to include the effective oversight and management of ESG matters as a strategic objective for our CEO under the AIP and welcomed our recent adoption of a comprehensive clawback policy.

Corporate

Governance

  

•   Our shareholders continued to express their broad support for our governance practices and shareholder rights, including special meeting right, use of annual director elections, and independent Board leadership structure, and thoughtful and active refreshment process.

 

  Supermajority

  Provisions

•   Shareholders noted appreciation forMany of our continued efforts to remove the remaining super-majority provisions in our charter and acknowledged the high hurdle presented by the current 80% voting requirement in our charter to approve amendments to remove the super-majority provisions.

•   Given our proactive and continued efforts to remove the remaining super-majority provisions over the past several years, a number of investors stated that they would have been supportive if our Board did not include a management proposal to eliminate supermajority provisions in our proxy statement in 2018.

•   However, several shareholders continued to express a preference for simple majority voting requirements and encouraged usthe view that the right to put forth another management proposal to remove the remaining super-majority voting provisions.

  Sustainability

•   We discussed how we approach sustainability from a risk management perspective, the governanceact by written consent is unnecessary in light of our sustainability program, andshareholders’ existing right to call special meetings. Moreover, to the extent some shareholders desired greater rights, the feedback was that our robust goalsadoption of a 15% ownership threshold in 2020 for special meetings was preferable to reduce energy usage and greenhouse emissions from operations by 20% indexed to net revenue by 2020 from a base year of 2010.

•   We also reviewed product innovations which demonstrate our commitment to sustainability-driven innovation as a growth opportunity for our businesses.

  Executivewritten consent right

  Compensation

•   Shareholders were supportive of our compensation program, including the effective use of our company-specific iTSR metric, viewing it as strongly incentivizing performance and value creation.

.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 2931


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

History of Board Responsiveness

We are committed to being responsive to our shareholders as demonstrated by the number of changes we have made over the years based on their input. In direct response to shareholder feedback, over the past 8 years, Dover has adopted and amended our special meeting right, adopted proxy access, implemented meaningful changes to our executive compensation program, removed all our super-majority voting provisions in our charter, adopted a robust clawback policy, and enhanced our disclosures to investors. The table below highlights many of the changes to our governance structures and compensation program that have been implemented over the past several years informed by shareholder feedback. These changes specifically address shareholders’ areas of focus and input gathered through our extensive shareholder engagements and outreach efforts.

Year

% of Outstanding Shares
Outreached /Engaged

Actions in Response to Shareholder Feedback

LOGO    2022    

Lead-up to 2022 AGM:

Ongoing

  Currently engaging with shareholders on corporate governance, executive compensation and sustainability ahead of the 2022 Annual Meeting

202159% / 31%

  Continued to maintain a refreshed and diverse board by appointing an additional female director

  Made several ESG accomplishments including:

  Announcing goals to reduce our GHG emissions by 2030

  Undertaking a climate risk assessment aligned with the TCFD reporting framework

  Setting new diversity & inclusion goals

  Establishing a working group of operating companies with a goal of embedding sustainability considerations into product development

2020

Winter: 65% / 15%

Lead-up to 2020 AGM:

51% / 12%

Fall: 59% / 38%

  Implemented for 2020 executive compensation program:

  Increased proportion of LTIP dedicated to performance shares and shifted from internal TSR to relative TSR as metric for performance shares

  Reduced maximum payout ceiling from 400% to 300% in LTIP

  Reduced ownership threshold required to call a special meeting of shareholders to 15% from 25%

  Adopted a diversity search policy for external director and CEO searches conducted by third-party search firms

  Made several ESG accomplishments including:

  A robust materiality assessment to help identify go-forward focus areas

  The launch of the sustainability portion of our website

  Publication of SASB and GRI indices

  Release of an “investor tear sheet” covering key ESG highlights

  Increased transparency into workforce demographics

2019

Lead-up to 2019 AGM:

63% / 37%

Fall: 63% / 41%

  Achieved removal of all supermajority provisions through submission of management proposal and comprehensive retail investor campaign

  Enhanced disclosure regarding individual strategic objectives and financial metrics in AIP

  Adopted comprehensive clawback policy

  Incorporated ESG oversight into CEO’s individual strategic objectives in AIP

201851% / 32%

  Put forth management proposal to remove supermajority voting provisions alongside comprehensive campaign with retail investors to build support – did not pass

201753% / 33%

  Updated AIP to 60% financial metrics / 40% strategic objectives from 50% / 50%

  Put forth management proposal to remove supermajority voting provisions – did not pass

201660% / 28%

  Adoption of proxy access

  Put forth management proposal to provide shareholders with written consent right – did not pass

201539% / 24%

  Launch of governance-focused shareholder engagement program

2014- / -

  Adoption of special meeting right

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 32


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

SustainabilityEnvironmental, Social, and Governance Oversight (ESG)

Throughout our history, our commitment to corporate responsibility and sustainability has created significant value for our shareholders and stakeholders. Across our portfolio of businesses and our team of employees, we remain focused on operating and innovating sustainably to help meet the goals of our customers, realize the full potential of our employees through a culture that supports and values their efforts, and make the communities in which we operate stronger. For more information on our initiatives and accomplishments, please visit https://www.dovercorporation.com/sustainability/overview.

Materiality Analysis

We conducted a materiality analysis in 2020 to identify the ESG issues most important to our business and stakeholders. Please see below for the specific areas of focus identified through the analysis. The findings from the materiality analysis were used by our Sustainability Steering Committee, comprised of our corporate and business leaders, to identify the ESG topics that are committedmost critical to creating economic value for shareholders by developing products designedthe company. These ESG areas of focus will guide our sustainability strategy moving forward as we implement a three-year ESG plan. For each sustainability topic, we are applying our resources, expertise, and innovation to help our customers meet their sustainability goals in response to evolving regulatoryimprove outcomes and environmental standards. We also foster sustainable business practices across our own businesses in order to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption.drive results.

LOGO

 

Key Areas of Focus

  Governance

•  Our Board oversees risk management, and periodically reviews the processes established by management*   Dover progress information to identify and manage risks, including those related to environmental and social issues. The Board is focusedbe provided on our long-term business strategy, including fostering sustainability-driven innovations, and incorporates our sustainability risks and opportunities into its overall strategic decision-making. Our Board also receives periodic updates on company-wide energy and carbon performance against targets, and is regularly briefed on each segment’s operational performance including productivity and safety performance.

  Environment

•  In 2010,these topics in response to our concerns around global sustainability, we developed and implemented a process to conduct an inventory of our greenhouse gas emissions. Since then, we have evaluated our climate change risks and opportunities, as well as developed an energy and climate change strategy that includes goals, objectives, and related projects for reducing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.

•  To further promote our sustainability efforts, we committed to reducing our overall energy and greenhouse gas intensity indexed to net revenue by 20% from 2010 to 2020. We are near our goal for reducing overall energy intensity and have surpassed our goal for reducing greenhouse gas intensity.

•  We believe that our focus on sustainability results in enhanced efficiency in our operations, which reduces costs, improves margins and helps us achieve operational excellence, and we will continue to work proactively to reduce our energy usage and carbon emissions amidst acquisition and business growth.

• We have also participated as a voluntary respondent in the Carbon Disclosure Project since 2010 and have maintained our scoring range since we began reporting.

  Human Capital

•  We foster an operating culture with high ethical standards that values accountability, rigor, trust, respect and open communications and is designed to encourage individual growth and operational effectiveness.

•  We have implemented numerous workplace safety initiatives to help ensure the health and welfare of our employees.

•  We continue to make significant investments in talent development, especially in the area of operational management, and recognize that the growth and development of our employees is essential for our continued success.

2022

Governance Oversight of ESG

Our governance framework serves as a strong foundation to promote the long-term interests of our shareholders. Our Board oversees our long-term strategic development and enterprise risk, including ESG risks. The Board’s oversight spans a wide array of ESG issues, including those related to climate change, health and safety, diversity and inclusion, ethics and compliance, and long-term environmental protection. As part of its continued focus on sustainability, our Board incorporates ESG oversight into the CEO’s annual performance and compensation evaluation as one of the CEO’s strategic objectives. The Board also has established a comprehensive enterprise risk management process to identify and manage risks, including any risks related to environmental and social issues.

Additionally, our cross-functional Sustainability Steering Committee was established in 2020 to manage ESG issues, meets at least four times per year, and provides an update to the Board at least annually. The Committee is responsible for guiding our sustainability strategy, initiatives, target-setting, performance, and reporting.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3033


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Progress Toward Goals

In 2021, we made progress on a number of fronts in line with our three-year ESG plan. We formalized our commitment to science-based emissions targets by announcing a goal of reducing scope 1 and scope 2 market-based GHG emissions of 30 percent by 2030 (from a 2019 baseline year) and reducing scope 3 GHG emissions of 15 percent by 2030 (from a 2019 baseline year). We also conducted a TCFD-aligned climate risk assessment and scenario analysis and recently published a summary of the results on our website to further improve transparency regarding our ESG areas of focus. Also, as part of our efforts around increasing our focus on developing products that help our customers meet their sustainability goals, we engaged with some of our operating companies during 2021 regarding innovation for sustainable products. Finally, we announced new goals regarding diversity & inclusion and TRIR reduction.

Key Areas of Focus

  Business Model

  & Innovation

•  We believe that sustainability-driven innovation presents a significant growth opportunity while contributing positively to enhanced resource efficiency and reduced waste. Accordingly, over the past several years, we have accelerated our efforts and processes around innovation, focusing on technologies which create tangible value for our customers.

•  Our businesses stay close to their customers, and our customers are demanding more energy-efficient products to serve their own sustainability needs. Whether related to demand for more energy efficient refrigeration cases in grocery or convenience stores, or clothing retailers using digital printing equipment requiring less water than traditional analog printing equipment, we believe we are well-positioned to have a positive impact on a broad scale.

  Climate Risk

•  There have been no material effects upon our earnings and competitive position resulting from our compliance with laws or regulations relating to the protection of the environment. We are aware of a number of existing or upcoming regulatory initiatives intended to reduce emissions in geographies where our manufacturing and warehouse/distribution facilities are located and have evaluated the potential impact of these regulations on our businesses. We anticipate that direct impacts from regulatory actions will not be significant in the short- to medium-term. We expect the impacts associated with climate change regulation would be primarily indirect and would result in “pass through” costs from energy suppliers, suppliers of raw materials and other services related to our operations.

  Materials

  Sourcing

•  We have adopted a “conflict free” supply chain policy. The policy has been communicated to suppliers through our Supplier Code of Conduct, the Conflict Minerals survey process, and through efforts to implement related terms and conditions in supplier contracts.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3134


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Directors’ Compensation

Ournon-employee directors receive annual compensation in an amount our Board sets from time to time. The directors’ annual compensation is payable partly in cash and partly in common stock in an allocation our Board may adjust from time to time. If any director serves for less than a full calendar year, the compensation to be paid to that director for the year will bepro-rated as deemed appropriate by theour Compensation Committee.

Our Board has adopted a policy that directors are expected to hold at any time a number of shares at least equal to the aggregate number of shares they received as the stock portion of their annual retainer during the past five years, net of an assumed 30% tax rate.

 

FOR 2018,2021, NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION WAS AS FOLLOWS:

Annual retainer of $250,000,$270,000, payable $130,000$150,000 in common stock and $120,000 in cash

Audit Committee Chair — additional annual cash retainer of $15,000

$30,000

Compensation Committee Chair Nominating— additional annual cash retainer of $20,000

Governance and GovernanceNominating Committee Chair and Finance Committee Chair — additional annual cash retainer of $10,000

$15,000

Board Chair — additional annual retainer of $150,000,$170,000, payable $125,000$130,000 in cash and $25,000$40,000 in common stock

Under our 2021 LTIP, eachnon-employee director can elect to defer the receipt of 0%, 50%, or 100% of the equity compensation payable in a year until termination of services as anon-employee director. Shares deferred are converted into deferred stock units representing the right to receive one share of our common stock for each unit held at the end of the deferral period. Dividend equivalents are credited on deferred stock units and will be distributed in cash at the time that shares are distributed in settlement of deferred stock units. Messrs. Francis, Johnston, Spiegel, Tobin, Todd, and Wagner and Ms.Mses. Graham and DeHaas elected to defer receipt of their 20182021 equity compensation and received deferred stock units.

The table below sets forth the compensation paid to our directors for services in 2018.2021.

 

 NAME

 

    

 

FEES EARNED

OR PAID

IN CASH ($)(1)

 

    

STOCK

AWARDS ($)(1)(2)

 

    

TOTAL

($)

 

 PETER T. FRANCIS

    

120,000

    

129,975

    

249,975

 H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR

    

60,000

    

54,127

    

114,127

 KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM

    

120,000

    

129,975

    

249,975

 MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON

    

245,000

    

154,970

    

399,970

 RICHARD K. LOCHRIDGE

    

125,000

    

129,975

    

254,975

 ERIC A. SPIEGEL

    

127,500

    

129,975

    

257,475

 MICHAEL B. STUBBS

    

60,000

    

63,177

    

123,177

 RICHARD J. TOBIN

    

40,000

    

49,904

    

89,904

 STEPHEN M. TODD

    

131,250

    

129,975

    

261,225

 STEPHEN K. WAGNER

    

130,000

    

129,975

    

259,975

 KEITH E. WANDELL

    

127,500

    

129,975

    

257,475

 MARY A. WINSTON

    

127,500

    

129,975

    

257,475

    

NAME

    

FEES EARNED

OR PAID

IN CASH ($)(1)

     

STOCK

AWARDS ($)(2)

     

TOTAL

($)

 

DEBORAH L. DEHAAS(3)

    

 

106,521

 

    

 

133,075

 

    

 

239,595

 

H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR

    

 

120,000

 

    

 

150,078

 

    

 

270,078

 

KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM

    

 

120,000

 

    

 

150,078

 

    

 

270,078

 

MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON

    

 

250,000

 

    

 

189,983

 

    

 

439,983

 

ERIC A. SPIEGEL

    

 

135,000

 

    

 

150,078

 

    

 

285,078

 

STEPHEN M. TODD

    

 

150,000

 

    

 

150,078

 

    

 

300,078

 

STEPHEN K. WAGNER

    

 

135,000

 

    

 

150,078

 

    

 

285,078

 

KEITH E. WANDELL

    

 

140,000

 

    

 

150,078

 

    

 

290,078

 

MARY A. WINSTON

    

 

120,000

 

    

 

150,078

 

    

 

270,078

 

(1)

Amounts include the standard annual cash retainer, the Chair’s additional cash retainer, and the additional annual cash retainer for committee Chairs. Mr. Stubbs retired from the Board effective as of the 2018 Annual Meeting. Mr. Tobin appears in this table only for the portion of compensation he received for his services as an

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 32


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 independent director prior to commencing services as our President and CEO on May 1, 2018. Mr. Gilbertson was first elected to the Board on August 2, 2018; his compensation reflects his partial year of service.
(2)

On November 15, 2018,2021, each of Messrs. LochridgeGilbertson and Wandell and Ms. Winston received 1,508865 shares of common stock with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $129,975.$150,078, Messrs. Francis, Spiegel, Todd and Wagner and Ms. Graham each received 1,508865 deferred stock units with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $129,975. Mr. Gilbertson received 628 shares of common stock with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $54,127 reflecting his partial year of service.$150,078, and Mr. Johnston received 1,7981,095 deferred stock units with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $154,970,$189,983, which included his additional compensation as Board Chair. Mr. Stubbs

(3)

Ms. DeHaas was first elected to the Board on February 11, 2021 and accordingly received 733 shares of common stock with an aggregate date fair market value of $63,177 for his partial year of service prior to his May 2018 retirement. Mr. Tobinpro-rata cash and equity in 2021. Ms. DeHaas received 579767 deferred stock units on November 15, 2021 with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $49,904 reflecting his partial year of service as an independent director prior to becoming President and CEO.$133,075.

Our Compensation Committee reviews our non-employee director compensation policy biennially and proposes changes to the Board, as appropriate. In reviewing the non-employee director compensation policy in 2022, our Compensation Committee

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3335


worked with its independent compensation consultant to assess the competitiveness of our non-employee director compensation policy based on benchmark information from peer companies and relevant compensation surveys. Based on its review, our Compensation Committee proposed and the Board adopted the following change to our non-employee director compensation policy to be effective in 2022: an increase by $15,000 of the annual retainer for non-employee directors, payable in common stock.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 36


Proposal 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has appointed the independent registered public accounting firm of PwC to audit the annual accounts of Dover and its subsidiaries for 2019.2022. PwC has audited the financial statements for the Company since 1995. Representatives of PwC are not expected to be present at the Annual Meeting.

Although shareholder ratification of PwC’s appointment is not required by Dover’sby-laws or otherwise, our Board is submitting the ratification of PwC’s appointment for the year 20192022 to Dover’s shareholders. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain PwC as Dover’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 20192022 but will not be obligated to terminate the appointment. Even if the shareholders ratify the appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in Dover’s interests.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT

OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR 2019.2022.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3437


PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Audit Committee Report

 

The Audit Committee is composed of directors who, in the opinion of the Board, are independent and financially literate under NYSE rules and qualify as audit committee financial experts as defined by the SEC. Information concerning the credentials of the Audit Committee members can be found in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors”.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board and available on Dover’s website. The Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing the quality and integrity of Dover’s financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditors, and the performance of the internal audit function.

Among other things, the Audit Committee appoints the Company’s independent auditors and is directly involved in the selection of the lead audit engagement partner, discusses with the internal audit function and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits, reviews the Company’s accounting policies and system of internal controls, reviews significant financial transactions, discusses with management and with the Board processes relating to risk management,pre-approves audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent auditors, and approves all fees paid to the independent auditors for such services.

For 2018, the Audit Committee engaged the independent registered public accounting firm PwC as Dover’s independent auditor. In selecting PwC, the Audit Committee considered, among other things: the experience and qualifications of the lead audit partner and other senior members of the PwC team; PwC’s historical performance on Dover’s audit and the quality of its communications with the Audit Committee; the results of the most recent internal quality control review or Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) inspection; PwC’s independence; its reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing; the appropriateness of its fees; and its tenure as Dover’s independent auditors, including its understanding of the Company’s global businesses, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee discussed with PwC the overall scope and plans for the audit of Dover’s 2018 financial statements. The Audit Committee met with PwC, with

and without management present, to discuss the results of PwC’s examination, their assessment of internal controls and the overall quality of financial reporting.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed, with both the management of Dover and PwC, Dover’s 2018 audited financial statements, including a discussion of critical accounting policies, the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles followed, the reasonableness of significant judgments reflected in such financial statements and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee met a total of nine times in 2018 and 2019 to discuss 2018 quarterly and full-year financial results and related disclosures.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the Rule 3526 letter from PwC required by the applicable requirements of PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with PwC its independence, including the impact of any relationships or permittednon-auditing services on PwC’s independence. The Audit Committee also discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed under PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301. The Audit Committee has also received written materials addressing PwC’s internal control procedures and other matters required by NYSE listing standards.

Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 be included in Dover’s Annual Report on Form10-K.

Audit Committee:

Stephen M. Todd (Chair)

H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

Eric A. Spiegel

Stephen K. Wagner

This report does not constitute “soliciting material” and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

The Audit Committee is composed of directors who, in the opinion of the Board, are independent and financially literate under NYSE rules and qualify as audit committee financial experts as defined by the SEC. Information concerning the credentials of the Audit Committee members can be found in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors”.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board and available on Dover’s website. The Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing the quality and integrity of Dover’s financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditors, and the performance of the internal audit function.

Among other things, the Audit Committee appoints the Company’s independent auditors and is directly involved in the selection of the lead audit engagement partner, discusses with the internal audit function and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits, reviews the Company’s accounting policies and system of internal controls, reviews significant financial transactions, discusses with management and with the Board processes relating to risk management, pre-approves audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors, and approves all fees paid to the independent auditors for such services.

For 2021, the Audit Committee engaged the independent registered public accounting firm PwC as Dover’s independent auditor. In selecting PwC, the Audit Committee considered, among other things: the experience and qualifications of the lead audit partner and other senior members of the PwC team; PwC’s historical performance on Dover’s audit and the quality of its communications with the Audit Committee; the results of the most recent internal quality control review or Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) inspection; PwC’s independence; its reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing; the appropriateness of its fees; and its tenure as Dover’s independent auditors, including its understanding of the Company’s global businesses, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee discussed with PwC the overall scope and plans for the audit of Dover’s 2021 financial statements. The Audit Committee met with PwC, with and without management present, to discuss the results of PwC’s examination, their assessment of internal controls and the overall quality of financial reporting.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed, with both the management of Dover and PwC, Dover’s 2021 audited financial statements, including a discussion of critical accounting policies, the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles followed, the reasonableness of significant judgments reflected in such financial statements and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee met a total of eight times in 2021 and 2022 to discuss 2021 quarterly and full-year financial results and related disclosures.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the Rule 3526 letter from PwC required by the applicable requirements of PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with PwC its independence, including the impact of any relationships or permitted non-auditing services on PwC’s independence. The Audit Committee also discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed under PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301. The Audit Committee has also received written materials addressing PwC’s internal control procedures and other matters required by NYSE listing standards.

Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 be included in Dover’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Audit Committee:

Stephen M. Todd (Chair)

Deborah L. DeHaas

H. John Gilbertson, Jr.

Eric A. Spiegel

Stephen K. Wagner

This report does not constitute “soliciting material” and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3538


PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Fees paid to, or accrued for, PwC for services to us and our subsidiaries for 20182021 and 20172020 (including reimbursable expenses) were as follows:

 

   
  2018     2017  

2021

  

2020

 

AUDIT FEES

  $

 

9,658,287

 

 

 

    $

 

12,169,363

 

 

 

 

$

7,487,600      

 

$

7,697,324      

AUDIT-RELATED FEES

  $

 

400,000

 

 

 

    $

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

$

55,870      

 

$

41,880      

TAX FEES

  $

 

603,942

 

 

 

    $

 

283,394

 

 

 

 

$

182,323      

 

$

173,305      

ALL OTHER FEES

  $

 

4,500

 

 

 

    $

 

3,600

 

 

 

 

$

900      

 

$

12,476      

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

TOTAL

  

 

$

 

        10,666,729

 

 

    

 

$

 

        12,856,357

 

 

 

$

                7,726,693       

 

$

                7,924,985       

Audit Fees. Audit fees include fees for audit or review services in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of our consolidated financial statements (including internal control over financial reporting), statutory and subsidiary audits and review of documents filed with the SEC. In 2018 and 2017, audit fees include fees for audit and review services in connection with thespin-off of Apergy from Dover, including associated filings with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees include fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the audit of our financial statements, such as due diligence services pertaining to potential business acquisitions and dispositions and consultations concerning the accounting and disclosure treatment of events and the impact of final or proposed rules and standards. In 2018 and 2017, audit-related fees include fees for services in connection with our adoption of new accounting standards.including system implementation assessments.

Tax Fees. Tax fees include fees for services that are performed by professional tax staff other than in connection with the audit. These services include tax compliance, consulting and advisory services.

All Other Fees. Other fees include fees fornon-audit services not listed above that do not impair the independence of the auditor and are not prohibited by the SEC or PCAOB.

Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consistent with its charter and applicable SEC rules, our Audit Committeepre-approves all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by PwC to us and our subsidiaries. With respect to certain services which PwC has traditionally provided, the Audit Committee has adopted specificpre-approval policies and procedures. In developing these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee considered the need to ensure the independence of PwC while recognizing that, in certain situations, PwC may possess the expertise and be in the best position to advise us and our subsidiaries on issues and matters other than accounting and auditing.

The policies and procedures adopted by the Audit Committee allow thepre-approval by the Audit Committee of permissible audit-related services,non-audit-related services and tax services. Under the policies and procedures,pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any generalpre-approval is detailed as to the particular services or category of services and is subject to a specific budget for each of them. The policies and procedures require that any other services be expressly and separately approved by the Audit Committee prior to such services being performed by the independent auditors. In addition,pre-approved services which are expected to exceed the budgeted amount included in a generalpre-approval require separate, specificpre-approval. For each proposed service, the independent auditors and management are required to provide detailed information to the Audit Committee at the time of approval. The Audit Committee considers whether eachpre-approved service is consistent with the SEC’s rules and regulations on auditor independence.

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 36


PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

All audit-related andnon-audit-related services of PwC during 20182021 listed above under “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” werepre-approved specifically or pursuant to the procedures outlined above. With respect to any tax services provided by PwC, PwC provided to the Audit Committee the communications required under PCAOB Rule 3524.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3739


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes Dover’s executive compensation programs in 2018. It describes Dover’s pay philosophy, how the Board, the Compensation Committee and the CEO have applied that philosophy to Dover’s executives and the process the Compensation Committee uses to make executive pay decisions, assess performance goals and results, and implement updates to our compensation program. On May 1, 2018, Mr. Tobin becameprogram and how it operates for our new President and CEO, following Mr. Livingston’s retirement. There are five current officers who are a NEO, plus Mr. Livingston:NEOs. Our NEOs for 2021 are:

 

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

RICHARD J. TOBIN

  

President & CEO

  ROBERT A. LIVINGSTON

BRAD M. CEREPAK

  

Former President & CEO

  BRAD M. CEREPAK

Senior Vice President & CFO

  WILLIAM W. SPURGEON, JR.

GIRISH JUNEJA

  

Senior Vice President & CEO, Dover Fluids

Chief Digital Officer

IVONNE M. CABRERA

  

Senior Vice President & General Counsel

  JAY L. KLOOSTERBOER

KIMBERLY K. BORS

  

Senior Vice President & Chief Human Resources

Resource Officer

Executive Summary

Our compensation programs areprogram is based on a pay-for-performance philosophy and is designed to supportincent executives to achieve financial and strategic goals that are aligned with the primary objectiveCompany’s long-term business strategy and the creation of creating sustained, long-term value for our shareholders. To achieve this objective, management is required to execute Dover’s strategy, resulting in sustainable revenue and earnings growth. The Compensation Committee believes that a strongpay-for-performance philosophy aligns our executives’ goals with long-term value creation for our shareholders.

Dover Business Overview

Dover is a diversified global manufacturer delivering innovative equipment and components, specialty systems, consumable supplies, software and digital solutions, and support services through three operating segments: Engineered Systems, Fluids, and Refrigeration2021 Performance & Food Equipment. Our entrepreneurial business model encourages, promotes, and fosters deep customer engagement and collaboration, which has led to Dover’s well-established and valued reputation for providing superior customer service and industry-leading product innovation. Our businesses are aligned in three segments structured around our key end markets and are designed to support focused growth strategies. Our segment structure also allows us to leverage Dover’s scale and channel presence while capitalizing on productivity initiatives.

2018 Company Performance HighlightsResults

In 2018, we:

Generated consolidated revenue from continuing operations of $7.0 billion, reflecting2021, despite the COVID-related challenges we continued to face, including increased material, labor and logistics costs, we delivered strong financial results, made advancements in organic growth of 3.7% for the year.

Delivered diluted EPS from continuing operations of $3.89, comparedinvestments and productivity initiatives, and deployed capital in a disciplined manner, in keeping with EPS of $4.73 for 2017. The decrease was largely driven by net benefits realized in 2017 from dispositions and the Tax Reform Act.

Completed thetax-freespin-off of our upstream energy businesses into a standalone, publicly traded company named Apergy.return-seeking strategic priorities.

 

 

Generated revenue of $7.9 billion, up 18% (+15% organic) compared to the prior year

Increased GAAP earnings by 64% and adjusted earnings by 35%

Increased GAAP earnings per share by 65% and adjusted earnings per share by 35%

Generated free cash flow of $944.4 million, an increase of $5.3 million compared to the prior year, representing 11.9% of revenue. Cash flow provided by operating activities was $1,115.9 million.

Continued to evolve our operating model to include center-led value capture from digital opportunities, and continued to invest in growth and productivity initiatives, including automation, capacity expansion, and the implementation of common corporate systems and measurement tools.

Increased our quarterly dividend, by 2%, marking our 63rd66th consecutive year of dividend increases.increases

 

Completed the acquisition of Ettlinger, a leading manufacturer of filtering solutions for the plastics recycling industry, which enhances our ability to serve the Process Solutions end market within our Fluids segment.

Executed a rightsizing plan that is expected to deliver $136 million of annualizedpre-tax earnings byyear-end 2019, of which $34 million will be reinvested in high-return growth initiatives.

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 38


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

While our financial performance was strong in 2018, our EBIT margins were below our expectations. As a result, our NEOs’ annual bonuses were lower than those earned for 2017. With respect to long-term compensation, Mr. Spurgeon, President and CEO of Dover Fluids, was the only NEO who received a payout on the performance share award for the 2016-2018 performance period. Based on his business unit’s iTSR performance over that period, his payout was below target.    

LOGOLOGO

Components of Compensation Aligned with Company Performance

In light of the strong support from our shareholders for our compensation program structure and its close alignment with our pay for performance philosophy, our 2018 executive compensation program structure was generally unchanged.

 
COMPONENT

PAY

ELEMENT

METRICS &
WEIGHTING
OBJECTIVESRATIONALE

BASE SALARY

CashAttractAcquired nine businesses for total consideration of $1,125.1 million, net of cash acquired and retain executives

including contingent consideration

Need to offer competitive salaries (benchmark to median of peer group)

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

Cash

60% Financial Results

—    Revenue

—    Income

—    EBIT Margin

Drive profitability, growth, and progress toward strategy implementationIndividual objectives are designed to incentivize achievement of long-term strategic goals to create shareholder value over time

40% Individual Strategic Objectives

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

SSARs

Dover Stock Price

3-year performance period

Drive profitability and growth, create shareholder value, foster executive retention, and align executive and shareholder interestsAll components paid in stock to align executive and shareholder interests

RSUs

Performance

Shares

iTSR

3-year performance period

BENEFITS

Consistent with other similarly situated employees

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 3940


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

2018 Compensation Drivers and OutcomesSuccess on Key Metrics (2019-2021)

The primary elements

LOGO

(1)

Definitions and reconciliations ofnon-GAAP measures are included at the end of this proxy statement.

(2)

Source: Capital IQ

2021 Pay Decisions Align with Dover’s Performance

Our compensation program structure is designed to align pay outcomes with our philosophy include a clearshareholders’ experience by emphasizing variable, at-risk pay for our management team, including the NEOs, through our AIP and long-term incentive program.

For 2021, our pay decisions and outcomes were consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy. Our financial performance strategy, an emphasis on incentive-driven paywas strong in 2021, and we exceeded the financial performance target under our AIP. In addition, our NEOs made significant progress against their pre-defined individual strategic objectives as evaluated by our Compensation Committee under our AIP. Consistent with our value creation over the three-year performance period of 2019-2021, the performance shares for that period, which vested at the end of 2021 and were based on metrics that align with value creationour historic internal TSR metric, had a payout percentage of 300% for our shareholders and objectives that support our strategy. The following are key elements of our program:NEOs.

 

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 41


Financial metrics that are clearly linked to the creation of shareholder value: earnings from continuing operations, revenue, and iTSR (increased enterprise value as measured by EBITDA growth plus free cash flow generation).COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Focus on our business strategy to ensure our long-term compensation program aligns the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders by placing an emphasis on performance-based stock compensation.

An annual review of the level of compensation and the components of our programs.

A reference to the median of our peer group for total direct compensation, with consideration for internal pay equity, sustained performance, specific responsibilities, and experience with comparable market talent.

Total compensation opportunities designed so that the large majority of compensation is based on business performance.

An annual cash bonus plan designed to reward annual financial performance as well as attainment of strategic objectives for the current year that the Board believes will assure the long-term success of Dover.

Executive benefits and programs that are consistent with those offered to other employees. We provide substantially no executive perquisites, nor do we own or operate any corporate aircraft.

2018Say-on-Pay AdvisorySay on Pay Vote Results and Shareholder OutreachEngagement

 

93% Say on Pay support        60% Shares Outstanding Contacted        31% Shares Engaged

Our Board has a strong history of engaging with shareholders and soliciting feedback on a range of topics, including our executive compensation program. Historically, our program has received strong shareholder support as expressed during our 96%one-on-one engagement discussions with shareholders and through our Say on Pay support  | 51%Shares Outstanding Contacted  | 32% Shares Engagedvote levels.

At our 2021 annual meeting, approximately 93% of the voting shareholders approved the compensation of the NEOs. At our 2020 annual meeting, over approximately 96% of the voting shareholders approved the compensation of the NEOs. In 2018, our executive compensation program received 96% approval from our shareholders, which was the same level of support received in 2017, reflecting shareholders’ continuing approval of our compensation program. In 2018,2021, we continued our shareholder engagement program. We reached out to holders of over 51%approximately 60% of our outstanding shares and engaged with governance professionals and/or portfolio managers atof investors holding approximately 32%31% of our outstanding shares. In addition to the governance topics detailed earlier in this proxy statement, we had thoughtful discussions with our shareholders regarding our compensation program. Our investors generallyShareholders told us they believe Dover’sour pay practices are aligned with ourpay-for-performance philosophy. We also sought shareholder feedback on Mr. Tobin’s compensation arrangements after his appointment, including hisone-time make-whole award. Our shareholders indicated they were supportive of the structure because it ensured a smooth transition and the Board’s ability to hire a highly qualified candidate. The Board appreciated the feedback it received, particularly regarding shareholder opinions on Mr. Tobin’s compensation arrangements, our metrics and the rigor of our target selection. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider this feedback from shareholders, as well as the results from future shareholder advisory votes, in its ongoing evaluation of executive compensation programs and practices at Dover.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4042


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Dover’s Alignment with Leading Compensation Governance Practices

 

WHAT WE DO

Yes

No

 

  The majority of target NEO pay opportunity is performance based (73%(74% for the CEO; 63%62% for the other NEOs)

 

  The majorityA significant portion of target NEO pay opportunity is tied to Dover stock performance (72%(73% for the CEO; 49%50% for the other NEOs)

 

  Each year, Dover interactsRobust engagement with key shareholders to seek feedback on Dover’s executive compensation programs

 

  Compensation program includes ESG objectives

  All long-term incentives are paid in stock, not cash

 

  Executives must hold significant amounts of Dover stock: five-times salary for the CEO, three-times for other NEOs

 

  All long-term incentives are earned or vest over three years

 

  Change in control (“CIC”) provisions require double trigger

 

  Comprehensive clawback policy

  Executives participate in benefit and employee programs on the same basis as other Dover employees

 

  Clawback provisions are included in the Pension Replacement Plan (“PRP”), executive severance plan (the “severance plan”), and the CIC severance plan. Clawback provisions are set to take effect in our long-term incentive plan once the SEC issues final rules

  TheOur Compensation Committee retains its own independent consultant

 

  Annual compensation risk assessment

 

 

WHAT WE DON’T DO

 

   No tax gross ups

 

   No repricing, reloads, or exchanges of SSARs

 

   No SSARs granted below fair market value

 

   No hedging or pledging of Dover securities by executives, including margin loans

 

   No dividends are paid on performance shares or restricted stock units (“RSUs”)RSUs during the earning or vesting period. Dividend equivalents are accrued on RSUs, but are only paid if the RSUs vest

 

   No special executive retirement arrangements

 

   No substantial executive perquisites, nor do we own or operate any corporate aircraft

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4143


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Compensation Process: Aligning Business Strategy and PerformancePrinciples

Guiding Principles for Dover’s Executive Compensation Program

Dover’s executive compensation programs are designed to do

LOGO

Based on these principles, these were the following:key elements of our program in 2021:

 

Financial metrics that are clearly linked to the creation of shareholder value: adjusted earnings and three-year relative TSR.

 

   Focus executives on consistent long-term value creation and a balanced capital allocation program to outperform our investors’ alternative investment choices in our industry.

 

A focus on our business strategy to ensure our long-term compensation program aligns the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders by placing an emphasis on performance-based stock compensation.

 

   Attract and retain highly qualified executives to look after our shareholders’ interests and manage our businesses.

 

An annual review by our Compensation Committee of executive compensation levels and the components of our program.

 

   Create the drive for over-achievement without creating undue riskA reference to the Company.

median of our peer group for total direct compensation, with consideration for internal pay equity, sustained performance, specific responsibilities, and experience with comparable market talent.

Total compensation opportunities designed so that the large majority of compensation is variable and at-risk based on financial, strategic, operational, and share price performance.

An annual cash bonus plan (the AIP) designed to reward annual financial performance and the attainment of well-defined strategic objectives that the Board believes will assure the long-term success of Dover.

Executive benefits and programs that are consistent with those offered to other employees. We provide substantially no executive perquisites, nor do we own or operate any corporate aircraft.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 44


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Process

Setting Executive Compensation — Roles

The process for determining our compensation program structure and payouts involves the dedicated participation of theour Compensation Committee, the independent directors of the Board, the CEO, and theour Compensation Committee’s independent consultant. The roles of each in making compensation decisions are:

 

Compensation Committee

LOGO

•  Oversee the development and administration of our compensation and benefits policies and programs.

•  Evaluate and approve the performance of the CEO and each NEO against specified individual strategic objectives, set at the beginning of the year.

•  Review and approve performance measures, weightings, and strategic goals for the annual and long-term incentive plans in the context of our business strategy.

•  Formulate the compensation recommendations for our CEO and present to the independent directors for approval.

•  Approve all compensation recommendations for direct reports to our CEO.

Independent Directors

•  Review the performance of our CEOmid-year and following the end of the fiscal year.

•  Provide vital feedback to our CEO about his performance and opportunities for improvement.

•  Review the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and, together with the Committee, determine the compensation of our CEO.

CEO

•  Recommend to the Compensation Committee salaries, annual incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards for his direct reports, including other NEOs.

•  Provide assessment of each officer’s performance including progress against strategic objectives, the performance of the individual’s respective segment or function, and employee retention considerations.

•  Play no role in matters affecting his own compensation other than providing the independent directors with a written self-assessment of his performance.

Independent Compensation Consultant

(Semler Brossy)

•  Provide the Compensation Committee with an evaluation of the market competitiveness of our executive compensation packages, an assessment of pay in relation to performance and input into CEO and other executive pay decisions.

•  Provide additional input on other compensation related matters at the request of the Compensation Committee.

•  Report directly to the Compensation Committee, which may replace the firm or hire additional consultants at any time.

•  Attend meetings of the Compensation Committee, upon request, and communicate with the Committee Chair between meetings.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4245


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Setting Executive Compensation – Timeline

The process for making executive compensation decisions for 20182021 began with goal setting at the beginning of the year and concluded with the actual compensation payout decisions in early 2019. In 2018, the process also took our CEO transition into consideration.2022. As described below, this year-long process integrates key factors, such as Dover’s business strategy, our annual budget, and market compensation data.

 

 

LOGO

February 2018

•   Compensation Committee and the independent directors of the Board reviewed and approved the financial performance targets for the AIP, taking into account our business strategy, and approved the then CEO’s 2018 strategic objectives

•   The then CEO approved the strategic objectives for each of his direct reports, including the NEOs, cascading his goals where appropriate to each executive

March 2018

•   In connection with the Board’s appointment of Mr. Tobin as our new President & CEO and to ensure a smooth executive transition, our independent directors, after considering market data, advice from our independent compensation consultant, and other factors, including his prior CEO experience, approved Dover’s entry into a three-year employment agreement with Mr. Tobin

November 2018

•   Compensation Committee reviewed and considered market compensation data and executive compensation trend information from its independent consultant

•   The Committee also reviewed tally sheets to understand the full cost of each executive’s compensation and benefits package, share ownership levels, realized pay, and payouts under different termination scenarios

•   The Committee, including the independent Chair of the Board, provided the new CEO with an interim performance assessment

January 2019

•   Compensation Committee and the other independent directors of the Board met by conference call to discuss and evaluate the new CEO’s performance in 2018

February 2019

•   Compensation Committee reviewed with the new CEO the financial and strategic performance of each of his direct reports, along with proposed pay actions

•   The Committee certified the performance results for the AIP and the performance shares

•   After discussion, the Committee approved pay actions for each CEO direct report

•   The Committee developed its CEO pay proposal consistent with the terms of the CEO employment agreement which was then discussed with the independent directors of the Board, and together they determined the pay actions for the CEO

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4346


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Executive Compensation Program Peer GroupingGroup

For assessing executive pay programs and levels, the Compensation Committee selected a group of companies that are similar to Dover in terms of end markets, complexity, revenues and market capitalization. In 2018,2021, with the help of its independent consultant, the Compensation Committee approvedreviewed the peer group and made no changes to the peer group to better match Dover’s end markets, complexity, revenue and market capitalization after thespin-off of Apergy. As a result, 3M Company, Weatherford International plc and Pentair plc were removed from the peer group. Corning Incorporated, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. andSnap-on Incorporated were added to the peer group.

 

IN USD MILLIONS FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS QUALITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 
 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
(IN USD MILLIONS)
 QUALITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
 

COMPANY

 

 

2018
REVENUE

 

 

 

2018

MARKET

CAP(1)

 

 

 

INDUSTRY

 

 

>20%

GLOBAL

REVENUES

 

 

 

DOVER-LIKE

STRUCTURE

 

 

 

SAME ANALYST  

COVERAGE(2)

 

  2021
REVENUE
 2021
MARKET
CAP(1)
 

INDUSTRY

 >20%
GLOBAL
REVENUES
 DOVER-LIKE
STRUCTURE
 SAME ANALYST
COVERAGE(2)
 

CARLISLE COMPANIES

 $4,480  $5,985  

 

Industrial

Conglomerates

 

      $4,810  $12,932  Industrial
Conglomerates
   
 

COLFAX CORPORATION

 $3,667  $2,449  

 

Industrial

Machinery

 

       $3,854  $7,115  Industrial
Machinery
   
 

CORNING INCORPORATED

 $11,290  $24,180  

 

Electrical

Equipment

 

      $14,082  $31,772  Electrical
Equipment
   
 

EATON CORPORATION

 $21,609  $29,757  

 

Electrical

Equipment

 

       $19,628  $68,886  Electrical
Equipment
   
 

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.

 $17,408  $37,413  

 

Electrical

Equipment

 

       $18,236  $55,308  Electrical
Equipment
   
 

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

 $3,833  $4,975  

 

Machinery

 

      

$

3,541

 

 

$

3,986

 

 

Machinery

   
 

FORTIVE CORPORATION

 $6,453  $22,596  

 

Industrial
Machinery

 

       $5,255  $27,356  Industrial
Machinery
   
 

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.

 $14,768  $42,036  

 

Machinery

 

       

$

 14,455

 

 

$

 77,466

 

 

Machinery

  

 
 

INGERSOLL-RAND PLC

 $15,668  $22,411  

 

Machinery

 

       

$

5,152

 

 

$

25,217

 

 

Machinery

  

 
 

PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

 $14,302  $19,739  

 

Machinery

 

      

$

14,348

 

 

$

40,883

 

 

Machinery

   
 

ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC.

 $6,666  $18,099  

 

Electrical

Equipment

 

      $6,997  $40,471  Electrical
Equipment
   
 

ROPER INDUSTRIES INC.

 $5,191  $27,566  

 

Industrial

Conglomerates

 

       $5,778  $51,884  Industrial
Conglomerates
   
 

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED

 $4,070  $8,090  

 

Industrial
Machinery

     $4,602  $11,530  Industrial
Machinery
   
 

STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.

 $13,982  $18,088  

 

Industrial
Machinery

      $15,617  $30,751  Industrial
Machinery
   
 

TEXTRON INC.

 $13,972  $11,174  

 

Aerospace &

Defense

 

      $12,382  $17,017  Aerospace &
Defense
   
 

XYLEM, INC.

 $5,207  $11,991  

 

Industrial

Machinery

 

      $5,195  $21,625  Industrial
Machinery
   
 

75TH PERCENTILE

 

 

$

 

 

14,419

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

25,027

 

 

 

 

     

$

14,374

 

 

$

43,633

 

    
 

MEDIAN

 

 

$

 

 

8,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

18,989

 

 

 

 

     

$

6,388

 

 

$

29,054

 

    
 

25TH PERCENTILE

 

 

$

 

 

5,013

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

10,403

 

 

 

 

     

$

5,067

 

 

$

15,996

 

    
 

DOVER

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

6,992

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

10,382

 

 

 

 

 

     

$

7,907

 

 

$

26,148

 

        

 

(1)

As of 12/31/2018.2021.

(2)

“Same analyst coverage” means company is covered by at least 5five of the analysts that cover Dover.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4447


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Role of Internal Equity in Setting Executive Compensation

Management and theour Compensation Committee consider both market benchmarks (i.e., external equity)competitiveness), as well as the impact each executive role has relative to internal peers (i.e., internal equity), in establishing the executive pay structures used to govern pay.

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

TheOur Compensation Committee has the authority and discretion to retain external compensation consultants as it deems appropriate. TheOur Compensation Committee has adopted a policy to ensure the continuing independence and accountability to the committee of any advisor hired to assist the committee in the discharge of its duties. The policy formalizes the independent relationship between the committee’sCompensation Committee’s advisor and Dover, while permitting management limited ability to access the advisor’s knowledge of Dover for compensation matters. Under the policy, theour Compensation Committee will annually review andpre-approve the services that may be provided to management by the independent advisor without further committeeCompensation Committee approval. Compensation Committee approval is required prior to Dover retaining the independent advisor for any executive compensation services or other consulting services or products above an aggregate annual limit of $50,000.

Since February 2010, theSeptember 2020, our Compensation Committee has retained Semler Brossy Consulting Group,Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Semler Brossy”Meridian”) to serve as its advisor. Semler Brossyindependent compensation consultant. Meridian does no other work for and has no other relationships with Dover. Semler Brossy focusesMeridian is focused on executive compensation and does not have departments, groups, or affiliates that provide services other than those related to executive compensation and benefits.

TheOur Compensation Committee looks to its consultant to periodically review and advise regarding the adequacy and appropriateness of our overall executive compensation plans, programs, and practices and, from time to time, to answer specific questions raised by theour Compensation Committee or management. Compensation decisions are made by, and are the responsibility of, theour Compensation Committee and our Board, and may reflect factors and considerations other than the information and recommendations provided by theour Compensation Committee’s consultant.

To ensure independence of the compensation consultant, the consultant reports directly to the Chair of theour Compensation Committee and works specifically for the Compensation Committee solely on compensation and benefits.

Semler BrossyMeridian did not engage in any projects for management in 2018. The2021. Our Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Semler BrossyMeridian and concluded that its work for the Compensation Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.

New CEO Compensation and Employment Agreement

On May 1, 2018, Richard J. Tobin became Dover’s President and CEO. Immediately prior to joining Dover, Mr. Tobin was the CEO of CNH. The independent directors, with the support of Semler Brossy, the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant, approved Dover’s entry into a three-year employment agreement with Mr. Tobin commencing May 1, 2018.

Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Tobin is entitled to an initial annual base salary of $1.2 million and a target annual bonus equal to 125% of base salary and receipt of an annual equity grant for each of Dover’s fiscal years ending during the term of the agreement with a grant date fair value of not less than $7 million. Mr. Tobin’s annual bonus for 2018 was guaranteed to be no less than the target annual bonus,pro-rated for the portion of 2018 on and following the commencement of the term.

 Annual Compensation Package for 2018 and 2019  Base   Target
Bonus
   LTIP
Grant
   Total 

 Richard J. Tobin

  $1,200,000   $1,500,000   $7,000,000   $9,700,000 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4548


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

In addition, Mr. Tobin received aone-time make-whole equity grant consisting of $6 million in the form of performance shares, having the same performance and vesting terms as our February 2018 iTSR performance share grants to our other employees, and $13 million in the form of RSUs, which vest in five equal installments on December 15th of each calendar year, starting on December 15, 2018 and ending on December 15, 2022. Mr. Tobin also received aone-time make-whole cash payment of $1,000,000, provided that he is obligated to repay this amount if he terminates his employment without good reason or if Dover terminates his employment for cause, as such terms are defined in the employment agreement, prior to May 1, 2019, and he is required to repay apro-rata portion of this amount if his employment is terminated without good reason or for cause prior to May 1, 2020.

For a more detailed description of Mr. Tobin’s employment agreement, see “CEO Employment Agreement” on page 58.

Elements of Executive Compensation

Focus on Variable, Performance-Based PayCompensation Program Structure Drives Pay-For-Performance Alignment

The pay packages of Dover executives consist predominantly of incentive-based pay, both annual and long-term. The ratio between fixed and variable pay varies by executive level, but for the CEO and his direct reports, including the NEOs, we feel it is appropriate that the vast majority of the pay package should be “at risk” incentive-based pay as shown in the chart below. Additionally, we believe that their incentive pay should be heavily weighted toward long-term performance and tied to share performance, with the annual incentives focused on key short-term drivers and progress on strategy. The CEO chart presented below excludes theone-time sign on cash and equity.

LOGO

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 46


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Each of the compensation components has a specific role in the overall design of our executive pay program. While the components are designed to be mutually reinforcing, care is taken to minimize overlap between them. The following table below shows how each element fits into our overall executive payprovides an overview of the 2021 compensation program and incentivizes performance over multiple time horizons.structure.

 

COMPONENTPAY ELEMENTMETRICS &
WEIGHTING
OBJECTIVESRATIONALE

  ANNUALComponent

Pay Element    2021 Metrics & Weighting    Objectives

Base Salary

 INCENTIVE

Cash

 PLAN

 n/a

 Attract and retain qualified executives

 Benchmarked to peer group median while also considering additional factors such as experience and performance in role

Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)

 Cash 

60% Financial Results

–  RevenueResults:

 

–  Income   Adj. Earnings (100%)

 

–  EBIT Margin

40% Individual Strategic Objectives

   ESG oversight included in CEO and select NEO individual strategic objectives

 Drive

 Intended to drive profitability, growth, and progress towardagainst strategy implementation

Individual objectives are designedfocused on a limited and measurable set of goals to incentivize achievementbenefit shareholders over the long-term

 Including ESG oversight in objectives establishes clear tone at the top regarding the importance of long-term strategic goals in order to createESG

Long-Term Incentive

Plan

Performance Shares

 40% LTIP weighting

 Performance Criteria: 3-Year relative TSR with the S&P 500 Industrials index companies as the comparator group

 Focus executives on shareholder value over timecreation

 Relative TSR closely aligns our executive-level measurement system with the experience of shareholders

  LONG-TERM

  INCENTIVE

  PLAN

 SSARs 

Dover Stock Price

3-year performance period 40% LTIP Weighting

 Performance Criteria: Dover stock price, exercisable three years after grant date and remain exercisable for another seven years (subject to 10-year stock price movement)

 Drive profitability

 Focus executives on share price appreciation

 SSARs are an important component of our program, reflecting input from investors, many of whom acknowledge the role SSARs play in emphasizing growth and growth, create shareholdergo-forward value foster executive retention, and align executive and shareholder interests

All components paid in stock to align executive and shareholder interestscreation

 RSUs 

 20% LTIP weighting

Performance SharesCriteria: Dover stock price; awards vest ratably over three years

 

iTSR Retention, ownership, and full alignment with the shareholder experience

3-year performance periodBenefits

Consistent with other similarly situated employees

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 49


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2021 Target Pay Mix

The ratio between fixed and variable pay varies by executive level, but for the CEO and his direct reports, including the NEOs, we believe it is appropriate that the vast majority of the compensation should be “at risk” incentive-based pay as shown in the chart below. Additionally, we believe that incentive pay should be heavily weighted toward long-term performance and tied to share performance, with the annual incentives focused on key short-term drivers and progress on strategy.

LOGO

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 50


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Pay-for-Performance Philosophy

Our Compensation Committee remains fully committed to its pay-for-performance philosophy. Dover’s record of long-term value creation is shown in the graphs below.

Total Shareholder Return1,2

LOGO

Note: These figures are annualized returns.

(1)   End date for returns period is December 31, 2021.

(2)   Annualized Total Shareholder Return including dividends and spin-offs. Fortive Corporation went public in July 2016 and Ingersoll Rand merged with Gardner Denver in March 2020. Both stocks are excluded from periods prior to go public / merger dates. Source: Capital IQ

DOV TSR vs. Proxy Peer Group (12/31/18 – 12/31/21)1

LOGO

Note: These figures are annualized returns. Source: Capital IQ.

(1)   Ingersoll Rand merged with Gardner Denver in March 2020 and is excluded from this analysis.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 51


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Annual Incentive Plan Compensation

An annual bonus may be earned each year based on an NEO’s performance against both financial objectives tied to the NEO’s business unit andour financial performance as well as individual strategic goals. Each NEO’s bonus target amount is determined in reference to market benchmarking and according to the scope and complexity of the NEO’s business/function complexity, size andfunctional responsibilities, overall impact on Dover’sour results, as well as strategic leadership, and managerial responsibility. We believe that balancing the measurement of performance for the annual bonus between financial and strategic objectives is important in mitigating risk and executing on our long-term strategy for value creation.

For 2018, 60%Each executive officer is eligible for a bonus equal to his or her base salary multiplied by his or her target award percentage multiplied by the Overall Payout Factor (which is the sum of the annual bonus of our NEOs other than Mr. TobinFinancial Objective Factor (weighted 60%) and the Strategic Objectives Factor (weighted 40%)).

LOGO

2021 AIP Financial Objective Factor – Target

The Financial Objective Factor in the 2021 AIP was calculated based on Adjusted Earnings. In setting the achievement of financial objective, our Compensation Committee considered our annual budget, operational priorities, plans for capital allocation, historical performance, criteria based on revenue and earnings (EBITexternal factors, among other items. The target performance level for segment executives and earnings from continuing operations for executivesthe financial objective was established at the corporate level)beginning of the fiscal year and was subjectprovided for appropriate adjustments for acquisitions and dispositions occurring during the year. For this measure, our Compensation Committee established threshold, target, and maximum levels of performance, as well as a payout percentage curve that relates each level of performance to a modifier basedpayout percentage.

Threshold and maximum performance levels are set at 85% and 107%, respectively, of target. The threshold and maximum performance levels were narrowed around target in 2021 to increase the performance sensitivity of the AIP. There is no payout on the EBIT margin ofFinancial Objective Factor if performance is below the NEO’s business unit. Financial targets were setthreshold. At threshold, the payout percentage curve begins at 50%. If performance is at the overall corporatetarget level, for corporate NEOs (Tobin, Cerepak, Cabrera and Kloosterboer) andthe payout percentage is 100%. For performance at or above the segmentmaximum level for segment NEOs (Spurgeon). Rightsizing and other costs incurred inof achievement, the third and fourth quarters of 2018 related to our initiative to reduce selling, general and administrative expense were not included in the calculation.payout percentage is capped at 200%.

The other 40%financial objective measure as originally established was adjusted to exclude forecasted performance contributions from Unified Brands following its sale on December 1, 2021, and to include forecasted contributions from the acquisitions of Innovative Control Systems, Inc. on December 30, 2020, AvaLAN Wireless Systems, Incorporated on April 19, 2021, Quantex Arc Limited on June 23, 2021, Blue Bite LLC on June 24, 2021, CDS Visual, Inc. on July 23, 2021, The Espy Corporation on September 15, 2021, LIQAL B.V. on October 15, 2021, Acme Cryogenics, Inc. on December 16, 2021, and Engineered Controls International, LLC on December 28, 2021.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 52


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2021 AIP Financial Objective Factor – Results

Following the annual bonus wasend of 2021, we calculated the Financial Objective Factor as follows:

  

2021 AIP FINANCIAL OBJECTIVE RESULTS (in millions)

  

 

 TARGET
PERFORMANCE
LEVEL
 ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE
LEVEL
 PAYOUT%
(BEFORE
WEIGHTING)
 

WEIGHTING

OF MEASURE

 WEIGHTED
PAYOUT%

Adjusted Earnings(1)

 

$902

 

$1,109

 

200%(2)

 

60%

 

 120%

Financial Objective Factor                    

 

120%

Performance Payout Curve

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 PERFORMANCE
LEVEL
 PAYOUT

PERCENTAGE  

      

Threshold

 

85%

 

50%

      

Target

 

100%

 

100%

      

Maximum

 

107%

 

200%

(1)

Definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are included at the end of this proxy statement.

(2)

The payout percentage for the Adjusted Earnings Financial Objective Factor would also have been at the maximum performance level using the performance levels in effect in 2020.

2021 AIP Individual Strategic Objectives Factor

The Strategic Objectives Factor is based on the achievement of individual strategic objectives designed to create long-term value for our shareholders. The individual strategic objectives for the CEO were set for our then CEO, Mr. Livingston,developed by our independent directorsCompensation Committee at the beginning of the year, approved by our independent directors, and communicated to the CEO in February. The individual strategic objectives were based on specific strategic initiatives that the Board and management agreed were important to achieve in 2018.2021. These objectives were cascaded to the CEO’s direct reports, as appropriate, based on their responsibilities or business portfolio. The Board monitored progress on the CEO’s strategic objectives and, following the end of the year, reviewed the CEO’s performance against these objectives when determining his annual bonus. Mr. Tobin’s annual bonus

Following the end of 2021, our Compensation Committee determined for 2018 was based oneach NEO a Strategic Objectives Factor between 0% and 200%. Our Compensation Committee believes such judgment is an important risk-mitigating element to our compensation program and provides an opportunity to further align executive compensation with long-term value creation. To make this determination, our Compensation Committee took into account each executive’s execution against his or her personal strategic objectives for the terms of his employment agreementyear and included consideration of his accomplishments in 2018 relating to strategic priorities established in consultation with the Board following his appointment as CEO.executive’s overall performance for the year.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4753


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

2018 AIP Financial Results PerformanceStrategic Objectives Factor — CEO

The actual bonuses paid to our NEOs for 2018 were lower than those earned for 2017 based on business results, reflecting ourpay-for-performance focus. Mr. Livingston, our former CEO, retired on May 1, 2018 and did not receive an AIP bonus for 2018.

  NEO

 

 2018 Targets

 

  2018 Results

 

 
 

 

(in millions, except EBIT Margin)

 

 
 

Net

Income(1)

 

  

Sales

 

  

EBIT(2)

 

  

EBIT
Margin(3)

 

  

Net

Income(1)

 

  

Sales

 

  

EBIT(2)

 

  

EBIT
Margin(3)

 

 

 

  DOVER CORPORATION

•  Richard J. Tobin

•  Brad M. Cerepak

•  Ivonne M. Cabrera

•  Jay L. Kloosterboer

 

 

 $634        $6,960     N/A       13.5%    $636        $6,992   N/A       12.8% 

 

  DOVER FLUIDS

•  William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

 

 

  N/A        $2,655    $403       15.2%     N/A        $2,797  $407       14.6% 

(1)

Net Income target and results include the impact of any acquisitions during 2018. The Net Income results exclude benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Reform Act”) and rightsizing and other costs.

(2)

EBIT refers to earnings before interest and taxes. The EBIT results exclude gains/losses on sale of divested business lines and rightsizing and other costs.

(3)

EBIT Margin refers to EBIT divided by Revenue.

2018 AIP Individual Strategic Objective Performance

Each oftable below summarizes the NEOs had uniqueindividual strategic objectives, in keeping withweightings, and results the strategic priorities communicated toCompensation Committee considered for our shareholders. Strategic objectives are intended to focus on a limited and measurable set of goals which, if accomplished, will benefit our shareholders over the long term. For NEOs other than Mr. Tobin, these objectives were used to determine 40% of their annual incentive. Similarly, Mr. Tobin’s strategic objectives were consideredCEO in determining his annual incentive but were not specifically tied to a portion of his 2018 bonus opportunity in keeping with the terms of his employment agreement.Strategic Objectives Factor for 2021.

 

Strategic Objectives & Accomplishments – Richard J. Tobin (President & CEO)

 Capital Markets (16.67%)

 

 Pursued active engagement with investors regarding our long-term strategy execution and value-creation priorities

2018 NEO INDIVIDUAL STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCEPortfolio Management (16.67%)

 

 

Mr. Tobin (President & CEO) became CEO of Dover in May 2018. He completed an assessment Continued to effectively deploy capital to increase the value of our portfolio including through acquisitions and operations. This resultedinvestments in a plan to reduce both our overheadorganic growth

 Successfully oversaw the integration of several recent acquisitions

Organic Investment and fixed cost structure, as well as a reaffirmation of our capital allocation priorities.Capital Spending Program (16.67%)

 

 

 Made progress on three-year capital structure plan to support our capital allocation priorities (organic investments, strategic acquisitions, and the return of capital to our shareholders) including in presentations to investors regarding our long-term strategy execution and value-creation priorities

Mr. Cerepak (Senior Vice PresidentTalent, Succession Planning & CFOWorkforce Diversity (16.67%) continued to improve the effectiveness of the global finance processes, with an emphasis on improving shared service operations and working capital management. He assumed responsibility for our strategy and acquisition activities in 2018. In addition, he played a significant role in thespin-off of Apergy.

 

 

 Completed several objectives in the multi-year strategy to help ensure that our culture continues to take an inclusive approach that values diversity

 Completed talent and succession planning review

Mr. ESG (16.67%) Spurgeon (President & CEO of Dover Fluids) continued to effectively lead our Fluids segment, exceeding his organic growth target. In addition, he oversaw the successful consolidation of Fueling System operations in China. The Fueling Systems operations consolidation in Europe did not meet its targets.

 

 

 Successfully implemented the second year of a multi-year ESG strategic plan by further improving transparency and setting public facing goals on ESG topics, including GHG emissions.

Ms. Cabrera (Senior Vice PresidentThree Pillars Progression (16.67%) & General Counsel) continued to effectively lead our Legal function. She led our Intellectual Property and corporate governance initiatives, as well as increasing the productivity of our legal resources. In addition, she played a significant role in thespin-off of Apergy.

 

 

Mr. Kloosterboer (Senior Vice President, Human Resources) continued to effectively lead our Human Resources function. He continued Continued to make progress on our global talent initiatives, as well as rolling out our global HRIS system. In addition, he played a significant role in thespin-off of Apergy.margin expansion initiatives.

Our Compensation Committee evaluated Mr. Tobin’s achievements against his strategic objectives and assigned him a Strategic Objectives Factor of 100%.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4854


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

2018 AIP Target Performance and PayoutStrategic Objectives Factor — Other NEOs

Overall, we meetThe following table summarizes the individual strategic objectives the Compensation Committee considered for our revenue and earnings targetsother NEOs in 2018, while missing our EBIT margin targets. In addition, we made progress on our strategic objectives. Actual compensation varies widely based on the individual’s business unit and performance against specific strategic objectives.determining their respective Strategic Objectives Factors for 2021.

 

NEO

 

  Annual Bonus in $   Annual Bonus % of Target
  

 

2016

 

   

 

2017

 

   

 

2018

 

   

 

2016

 

   

 

2017

 

   

 

2018

 

 

Richard J. Tobin(1)

 

      

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

      

 

N/A(1)

 

 

Brad M. Cerepak

 

  

 

 

 

 

530,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

970,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

773,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

79%  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

142%

 

 

 

 

  

 

110%

 

 

William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

 

  

 

 

 

 

310,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

640,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

601,700

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

48%  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  98%

 

 

 

 

  

 

  93%

 

 

Ivonne M. Cabrera(2)

 

      

 

 

 

 

434,000

 

 

 

 

      

 

115%

 

 

Jay L. Kloosterboer(2)

 

      

 

 

 

 

434,000

 

 

 

 

      

 

115%

 

 

(1)

Mr. Tobin’s bonus was guaranteed for 2018.Brad M. Cerepak (Senior Vice President & CFO)

Mr. Cerepak’s strategic objectives were focused on corporate strategy (25% weighting), capital structure analysis (25%), finance transformation and control environment (25% weighting), and audit plan initiatives (25% weighting). Our Compensation Committee considered his: (1) role in assessing our portfolio of businesses and evaluating options for capital deployment; (2) support on aligning key metrics and market positions to drive shareholder communications; (3) efforts to support the preparation of our three-year capital structure plan; (4) continued commitment to optimizing the structure of our finance team and improving process efficiency of shared services; and (5) enhancements to our internal controls environment; and (6) role in improving our audit plan structure.

Girish Juneja (Senior Vice President & Chief Digital Officer)

Mr. Juneja’s strategic objectives were focused on strategic digital initiatives (35% weighting), digital customer experience (25% weighting), data security (25% weighting), and product development (15% weighting). Our Compensation Committee considered his: (1) role in supporting our strategic initiatives and priorities by assessing the digital capabilities of acquisition targets and driving adoption of shared services; (2) continued support in building common platforms to enhance the customer experience and in delivering efficiencies by enabling automated transactions; (3) efforts related to our enterprise-wide strategy to improve data and identity security; (4) progress on our information technology centralization initiatives; and (5) expansion of connected software and machine learning augmented solutions built to integrate and work with our equipment and component offerings.

Ivonne M. Cabrera (Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary)

Ms. CabreraCabrera’s strategic objectives were focused on ESG (34% weighting), legal spend optimization (33% weighting), and Mr. Kloosterboer became NEOsintellectual property (33% weighting). Our Compensation Committee considered her: (1) participation on our Sustainability Steering Committee and key role in driving initiatives and communications aligned with respectour three-year plan to expand the scope of our ESG practices and disclosures; (2) continuing guidance on legal issues related to the year 2018COVID-19 pandemic, including regulatory and therefore,legislative developments, government relief measures, and matters impacting our employees and customers; (3) progress in expanding the years 2017use of technology to collect and 2016 are not illustrated.leverage data to drive optimization initiatives and maximize the value of strategic legal advice and counseling provided to the business; and (4) efforts to improve how we capture and protect intellectual property across the enterprise.

Kimberly K. Bors (Senior Vice President & Chief Human Resource Officer)

Ms. Bors’ strategic objectives were focused on the global HR operating model (25% weighting), enterprise talent management (25% weighting), strategic HR project initiatives (25% weighting), and ESG/Diversity & Inclusion (25%). Our Compensation Committee considered her: (1) role in developing the global operating model designed to expand shared services and centers of expertise, and improve operational effectiveness of the human resources function; (2) continuing progress to enhance talent management processes, capabilities and succession depth across the enterprise; (3) efforts to develop and launch a global career architecture and compensation structure, and a comprehensive Diversity & Inclusion roadmap; (4) successfully streamlining, outsourcing, and offshoring several HR processes to achieve cost reductions; (5) continuing role in the COVID-19 pandemic response and guidance for employee protocols; and (6) membership on the Sustainability Steering Committee and, in connection therewith, role in establishing goals and execution plans related to both an employee engagement survey with inclusivity index and unconscious bias training for employees with direct reports.

Our Compensation Committee assigned an average Strategic Objectives Factor of 100% to the 2018 Performance Sharesnon-CEO NEOs.

The 2018 performance shares are based onOverall Payout Factors resulting from the three-year performance period of 2016-2018,above Financial Objective Factors and the performance is measured on iTSR, which is described below. TheStrategic Objectives Factors resulted in the payouts set forth in the 2021 Summary Compensation Committee believes our iTSR measure focuses executives on key financial and strategic drivers of long-term shareholder value. All equity awards outstanding as of May 9, 2018 were adjusted as a result of thespin-off of Apergy to preserve the value of the awards in accordance with the Employee Matters Agreement, dated May 9, 2018, between Dover and Apergy.Table.

 

 NEO

 

  

 

TARGET # OF  SHARES

   

 

ACTUAL SHARES  AWARDED

 
  

 

2018

 

   

 

2018

 

 

 

 Richard J. Tobin

 

  

 

 

 

 

N/A              

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

N/A                    

 

 

 

 

 

 Robert A. Livingston

 

  

 

 

 

 

26,930              

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0                    

 

 

 

 

 

 Brad M. Cerepak

 

  

 

 

 

 

7,665              

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0                    

 

 

 

 

 

 William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

 

  

 

 

 

 

6,836              

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,231                    

 

 

 

 

 

 Ivonne M. Cabrera

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,314              

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0                    

 

 

 

 

 

 Jay L. Kloosterboer

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,314              

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0                    

 

 

 

 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 4955


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The following table summarizes the components of awards under our Dover Corporation 2012 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)LTIP and the related performance criteria for awards granted in 2018.2021. Note that all components are paid in stock rather than cash to encourage shareholder alignment through stock ownership.

 

 
  LTIP COMPONENT              Pay Element  PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
2021 Weighting & Performance Criteria
 PURPOSEObjectives

Performance Shares

  

 

VESTING OR EXERCISE
PERIOD
  40% LTIP weighting

 

  STOCK SETTLED STOCK 

  APPRECIATION RIGHTS  Performance Criteria: 3-Year relative TSR with the S&P 500 Industrials index companies as the comparator group

 Market Price of our Common

  Focus executives on shareholder value creation

Stock Settled Stock Appreciation Rights

  

   40% LTIP weighting

To focus  Performance Criteria: Dover stock price, exercisable three years after grant date and remain exercisable for seven years (subject to 10-year stock price movement)

  Focus executives on share price appreciation

SSARs are not exercisable until three years after grant; they remain exercisable for another seven years

Restricted Stock Units

  

   20% LTIP weighting

SSARs are not exercisable until  Performance Criteria: Dover stock price; awards vest ratably over three years after grant; they remain exercisable for another seven years

  RESTRICTED STOCK

  UNITS

 Market Price of our Common Stock

Retention and full alignment with the shareholder experience

Awards vest ratably over three years

  PERFORMANCE

  SHARES

iTSR (EBITDA growth
and cash flow
generation)

To focus executives on core enterprise value creation

Three calendar years

Long-Term Incentive Plan MixPerformance Shares Granted in 2020 and 2021 – Relative TSR Metric

Beginning with grants made in 2020, performance shares are earned based on our relative TSR performance against the S&P 500 Industrials index companies. The relative TSR metric provides shareholders with a transparent and simple measure to gauge our performance against companies in our industry, and aligns the interests of our executives with our shareholders. The relative TSR targets for our performance shares are highly competitive. Awards are earned three years after the grant, provided relative TSR exceeds a threshold level with a maximum payout capped at 300% of target. Performance share payouts will be capped at 100% if absolute TSR is negative over the performance period.

For performance share grants made in 2020 and after, payouts will be made on a sliding scale using the following formula based on our relative TSR performance:

 

LOGO

LOGO

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 56


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Performance Shares & iTSRGranted Prior to 2020 – Internal TSR Metric

The Compensation Committee believesperformance shares that vested in 2021 are based on the three-year performance period of 2019-2021, and the performance is based on our iTSR measure focuses executiveshistoric internal TSR metric, which is described below. Consistent with our value creation over the three-year performance period, the performance shares that vested in 2021 had a payout percentage of 300% for our NEOs.

    
    

Target # of Shares

 

     

Actual Shares Awarded

 

       

Richard J. Tobin

   15,351      46,053     

Brad M. Cerepak

   4,386      13,158     

Girish Juneja

   987      2,961     

Ivonne M. Cabrera

   1,754      5,262     

Kimberly K. Bors

   N/A      0      

Definition of Internal TSR.The performance shares granted to NEOs for the performance period of 2019-2021 are measured based on key financial and strategic drivers of long-term shareholder value. iTSR,internal TSR, which, by definition, is a measure of value creation for our business segments and operating companies. The key components of iTSRinternal TSR are EBITDA Growth and Free Cash Flow. Based on rigorous testing over time, the Compensation Committee continues to believe iTSRinternal TSR is:

 

highly correlated with long-term shareholder value creation for a multi-industry company such as Dover,

 

highly correlated with the combination of return on invested capital (“ROIC”) and organic growth, and

 

more effective in driving behaviors than relative TSR because it measures outcomes that are more within management’s control, such as revenue growth (organic and acquisition), and margin improvements.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 50


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Definition of iTSR.iTSRInternal TSR measures the change in enterprise value over a three-year period. EBITDA is assigned a multiple based on prevailing market multiples among industrial companies. iTSRInternal TSR tracks the change in that EBITDA-based value, along with Free Cash Flow generated during the three-year performance period. The two together work similarly to an external TSR measure: the EBITDA-based value becomes a proxy for share price, and Free Cash Flow becomes a proxy for dividends. Further, EBITDA Growth and Free Cash Flow together focus our business leaders on growing our business, investing in continuing operations, and shaping our portfolio with capital-effective acquisitions and dispositions.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

EBITDA Growth — We believe that EBITDA is useful for purposes of evaluating our ongoing operating profitability as it excludes the depreciation and amortization expense related primarily to capital expenditures and acquisitions that occurred in prior years, as well as in evaluating our operating performance in relation to our competitors.

 

Free Cash Flow — Free Cash Flow is operating cash flow less capital spending, less cash used for acquisitions, plus cash received from divestitures. We believe that Free Cash Flow is an important measure of our operating performance as it provides a measurement of cash generated from operations that is available for mandatory payment obligations and investment opportunities, such as funding acquisitions, paying dividends, repaying debt and repurchasing our common stock.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 57


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Safeguards.Since iTSRinternal TSR is an absolute measure of value creation, we have implemented safeguards to substantially eliminate large payouts resulting solely from economic cycles. Further, payouts under the program are in shares, and our shareholding requirements ensure that executives are exposed to the same stock price changes as our shareholders, including external stock market factors. Dividends are not accrued or paid on performance shares during the performance period.

Rigorous iTSRInternal TSR Targets, Threshold and Cap Levels.iTSRInternal TSR targets for our Performance Sharesperformance shares are demanding and were rigorously back-tested to confirm that they are set to tie performance share payouts with comparable relative TSR performance levels. Awards are earned three years after the grant, provided iTSRinternal TSR exceeds a threshold level. No payouts will be made unless iTSRinternal TSR equals or exceeds 6%5%. The payout to any individual may not exceed 500,000 shares.

DOVER CORPORATION – For performance share grants made in 2019, Proxy Statement 51


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Payouts of performance shares arepayouts were made on a sliding scale using the following formula:formula with a maximum payout at 300% of target:

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Stock Settled Stock Appreciation Rights

Similar to stock options, SSARs align executive interests with shareholder interests for stock price growth for several years into the future. They focus executives on increasing the stock price over the long term. SSARsStock Settled Stock Appreciation Rights (SSARs) give our NEOs the ability to participate in the price appreciation of a set number of shares of Company stock. Once SSARs vest, an NEO may exercise them any time prior to the expiration date. Thedate and the proceeds from the exercise are paid to the NEO in the form of shares of Dover common stock to encourage continued share ownership and shareholder alignment.

SSARs vest and are exercisable 3 years after grant date and remain exercisable for seven years, which means the awards are subject to Illustration10-year stock price movement thus aligning executive interests with shareholder interests over the long term. Importantly, in light of SSARs Exercise:our active acquisition program, SSARs’ forward-looking orientation is effective for incentivizing our newly-acquired companies and employees, who must create new value in order to realize gains. Furthermore, SSARs’ 10-year life cycle is essential to managing value creation with a business that has a portfolio of industrial companies whose economic cycles vary.

Base Price /Exercise Price

$60 

Fair Market Value (“FMV”) on date of exercise

$80 

Number of SSARs Granted

100 

EXERCISE STEPGain in ValueTotal Value after Exercise

Total Shares Awarded 

post Exercise *

CALCULATION FORMULA

FMV - Ex. PriceGain in Value x Number of

SSARs

Total Value ÷ FMV

RESULT

$80 - $60 = $20  

($20 per SSAR)

$20 x 100 = $2,000$2,000 ÷ $80 = 25

*

Subject to tax withholding

Restricted Stock Units

RSU grants attract and retain NEOs by providing them with some of the benefits associated with stock ownership during the vesting period. Executives do not actually own the shares underlying the units, nor do they enjoy the benefits of ownership such as dividends and voting, until the vesting conditions are satisfied. Once vested, the NEO receives shares of Dover stock equivalent in number to the vested units and receives a cash amount equal to accrued dividends during the vesting period, net of withholding taxes.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 52


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2019 Changes to our Executive Compensation

Changes in Salary, Target Bonus, or LTIP grants

None of our NEOs received a salary, target bonus or LTIP grant increase for 2019.

Other Benefits

401(k), Pension Plan and Health & Wellness Plans

Our executive officers are able to participate in retirement and benefit plans generally available to our employees on the same terms as other employees. Dover and most of our businesses offer a 401(k) plan to substantially all U.S.-based employees

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 58


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

and provide a Company matching contribution denominated as a percentage of the amount of salary deferred into the plan by a participant during the course of the year. Some of our U.S.-based employees also participate in atax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. Effective December 31, 2013, we closed both our qualified andnon-qualified defined benefit retirement plans to new employees. We intend to freeze any future benefit accruals in both plans effective December 31, 2023. All of our U.S.-based employees are offered a health and wellness plan (including health, term life and disability insurance). NEOs do not receive enhanced health and wellness benefits.

Non-Qualified Retirement Plans

We offer twonon-qualified plans with participation generally limited to individuals whose annual salary and bonus earnings exceed the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limits applicable to our qualified plans: our PRPPension Replacement Plan (“PRP”) and our deferred compensation plan. Participation in the deferred compensation plan is open to employees with an annual salary equal to or greater than $175,000.$175,000 for 2021 deferral elections and $250,000 for 2022 deferral elections.

After December 31, 2009, benefits under the PRP before offsets are determined using the benefit calculation and eligibility criteria as under the pension plan, except that IRS limits on compensation and benefits do not apply. Prior to December 31, 2009, the participants in the PRP accrued benefits greater than those offered in the pension plan. Effective January 1, 2010, we modified this plan so that executives subject to IRS compensation limits will accrue future benefits that are substantially the same as benefits under the pension plan. Individuals who participated in the PRP prior to January 1, 2010 will receive benefits calculated under the prior benefit formula through December 31, 2009 and benefits calculated under the lower PRP benefit formula on and after January 1, 2010. Amounts receivable by the executives under the PRP are reduced by any amounts receivable by them under the pension plan, any qualifying profit sharing plan, Company-paid portion of social security benefits, and the amounts of the Company match in the 401(k) plan.

Effective December 31, 2013, the PRP was closed to new employees. All eligible employees as of December 31, 2013 will continue to earn PRP benefits through December 31, 2023 as long as they remain employed by Dover and its affiliates. Effective December 31, 2023, Dover intends to eliminate any future benefit accruals consistent with the freezing of benefit accruals under the pension plan.

We offer a deferred compensation plan to allow participants to elect to defer their receipt of some or all of their salary, bonuses and any payout of a cash performance award. The plan permits executive officers to defer receipt of part of their compensation to later periods and facilitates tax planning for the participants. Effective January 1, 2014,2022, the deferred compensation plan was amended to also provide for certain matching and additionalautomatic Company contributions for participants who do not also participate in the PRP. Our NEOs are participants inPRP or have a present value benefit under the PRP and are not eligible for matching or additional contributions under the deferred compensation plan. Accordingly, we do not consider the deferred compensation plan to play a major role in our compensation program for our NEOs as we do not match any amounts deferred or guarantee any particular return on deferrals.of less than $100,000.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 53


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Severance

All of our NEOs are eligible to participate in our severance plan. Under the plan, if we terminate an NEO’s employment without cause (as defined in the severance plan), the NEO will generally be entitled to receive twelve months of salary plus target annual cash bonus, outplacement services, and healthcare benefits continuation, and a prorated annual cash bonus and a prorated performance share award for time worked during the year. In addition, Mr. Tobin is entitled to receive certain severance payments and benefits under his employment agreement in the event his employment is terminated by Dover without cause or by him for good reason. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Change-in-Control.”Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Plan

Our Senior ExecutiveChange-in-Control Change in Control Severance Plan

We have a senior executive CIC severance plan. The CIC severance plan (the “CIC Severance Plan”) establishes the severance benefits payable to eligible executives if they are involuntarily terminated following achange-in-control. change in control. All of our NEOs are eligible to participate in the CIC severance plan.Severance Plan. An executive eligible to participate in the CIC severance planSeverance Plan as of the date of achange-in-control change in control will be entitled to receive severance payments under the plan if, within 1824 months after thechange-in-control, change in control, either the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or he or she terminates employment for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the plan). The severance payments and benefits will consist of: a lump sum payment equal to 2.0 times their annual salary and target bonus, a prorated annual cash bonus at target, full acceleration of all unvested SSARs and RSUs, performance share payout at target for all in-cycle awards, outplacement services, and a lump sum payment equal to the cost of Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) health care benefit continuation of the executive and covered family members for twelve24 months. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control. Change in Control.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 59


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

No executive may receive severance benefits under more than one plan or arrangement. Dover does not provide taxgross-ups in the CIC severance plan.Severance Plan.

Other Elements of Compensation

Clawback Policy

Currently,In 2019, we adopted a formal clawback and recoupment policy applicable to our executive officers. If our Board determines, in its sole discretion acting in good faith, that any executive officer has engaged in fraud or intentional misconduct that caused or was a significant contributing factor to a material restatement of all or a portion of our consolidated financial statements, the Board may, to the extent permitted by law, and to the extent it determines that it is in Dover’s best interest, require reimbursement to Dover for, or reduce or cancel, any incentive compensation paid, granted or credited to such executive officer on or after November 7, 2019. We may effect any such recoupment by requiring the executive officer to pay Dover the relevant amount, by set-off, by reducing future compensation or by such other means or combination of means as the Board determines to be appropriate.

Apart from the clawback policy described above, our PRP includes clawback provisions for termination for cause and the severance plan and CIC severance planSeverance Plan provide for clawback of benefits for breaches of the plan. Our LTIP provides that awards will be subject to such clawback requirements and policies as may be required by applicable law or Dover policies in effect from time to time. We intend to adopt a broader recovery policy once the SEC issues final rules.

Anti-hedging and Anti-pledging Policy

Currently, all employeesOur Securities Trading and Confidentiality Policy prohibits directors, executive officers and any employee who receive anhas previously received or receives any type of long-term incentive plan award, under our LTIP, including all NEOs, are prohibitedand certain persons and entities related to any such persons, from engaging in short-sales, transactions in derivative securities or any other form of hedging transaction designed to hedge or pledging their positionoffset any decrease in the market value of Dover stock.securities granted to or held by such persons. In addition, such persons may not hold Dover securities in a margin account or pledge securities as collateral for a loan or any other obligation.

Perquisites

We provide substantially no executive perquisites, nor does the Company own or operate any corporate aircraft. Management and theour Compensation Committee believe that providing significant perquisites to executive officers would not be consistent with our overall compensation philosophy. As a result, we do not provide executive officers with perquisites such as social club memberships, company cars or car allowances, or financial counseling, or any other perquisites. Executivescounseling. Except for executive physicals, our NEOs participate only in programs generally available to Dover employees.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 54


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Shareholding Guidelines

We believe that our executives will most effectively pursue the long-term interests of our shareholders if they are shareholders themselves. As a result, share ownership guidelines are in place for all NEOs (subject to exceptions that may be granted by theour Compensation Committee for significant personal events or retirement planning). Our CEO is required to hold shares equal in value to five-times salary and our other NEOs are required to hold shares equal in value to three-times salary. Our policy requires that NEOs hold/retain all equity grants until the share ownership guidelines are met. Based on current share ownership, all executives serving as NEOs are currently in compliance with the guidelines.

LOGO

The Our Compensation Committee reserves the right to provide a portion of annual bonus in stock for any officer who fails to meet or make satisfactory progress toward satisfying the guidelines.

Risk Assessment

In 2018,2021, Dover, with the assistance of Willis Towers Watson, updated the formal risk assessment that was conducted in 20172020 for all our incentive compensation programs that have material impact on our financial statements. Willis Towers Watson inventoried incentive compensation programs at the corporate and operating company levels globally and conductedin-depth reviews of financially material plans, identified based on expected spend and income statement accounts tied to the program. The reviews focused on both the plan design features as well as internal risk mitigation controls in place. Based on this 2017 review and the 2018 update,assessment, we have concluded that Dover’s compensation practices and policies do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 5560


Compensation Committee Report

We reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in Dover’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

We reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in Dover’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Compensation Committee:

    

Keith E. Wandell (Chair)

Kristiane C. Graham

Michael F. Johnston

Mary A. Winston

  Peter T. Francis
Kristiane C. Graham
Michael F. Johnston
Richard K. Lochridge
Mary A. Winston

This report does not constitute “soliciting material” and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

This report does not constitute “soliciting material” and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 5661


Executive Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table

The Summary Compensation Table and notes show all remuneration for 20182021 provided to our NEOs, consisting of the following officers:

Our President & CEO and our former President & CEO;

Our Senior Vice President & CFO; and

Our three other most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of 2018.2021.

The determination of the most highly compensated executive officers is based on total compensation paid or accrued for 2018,2021, excluding changes in the actuarial value of defined benefit plans and earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation balances.

 

  Name and Principal Position Year 

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)(1)

  

Stock

Awards

($)(2)

  

Option

Awards

($)(3)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(4)

  

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)(5)

  

All Other

Compensation

($)(6)

  

Total

($)

 

  Richard J. Tobin

  President & Chief

  Executive Officer

 

 

2018

 

 

776,924

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

 

 

22,013,074

 

 

 

3,071,394

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

70,009

 

 

 

27,931,401

 

  Robert A. Livingston

  Former President & Chief

  Executive Officer

 

2018

 

 

366,667

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

271,307

 

 

 

333,303

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

628,096

 

 

 

83,609

 

 

 

1,682,982

 

 

2017

 

 

1,060,000

 

 

 

1,725,000

 

 

 

2,699,960

 

 

 

2,580,618

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,814,023

 

 

 

73,765

 

 

 

9,953,366

 

 

2016

 

 

1,030,000

 

 

 

880,000

 

 

 

2,599,952

 

 

 

2,519,488

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,225,883

 

 

 

37,932

 

 

 

8,293,255

 

  Brad M. Cerepak

  Senior Vice President & Chief

  Financial Officer

 

2018

 

 

705,000

 

 

 

773,000

 

 

 

800,049

 

 

 

901,146

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

123,659

 

 

 

30,830

 

 

 

3,333,684

 

 

2017

 

 

685,000

 

 

 

970,000

 

 

 

799,936

 

 

 

764,629

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

397,072

 

 

 

27,872

 

 

 

3,644,509

 

 

2016

 

 

670,000

 

 

 

530,000

 

 

 

740,014

 

 

 

717,089

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

278,934

 

 

 

320,331

 

 

 

3,256,368

 

  William W. Spurgeon

  President & Chief

  Executive Officer, Dover Fluids

 

2018

 

 

650,000

 

 

 

601,700

 

 

 

550,003

 

 

 

413,019

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

22,057

 

 

 

2,236,779

 

 

2017

 

 

650,000

 

 

 

640,000

 

 

 

549,965

 

 

 

350,458

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,119,977

 

 

 

21,289

 

 

 

3,331,689

 

 

2016

 

 

650,000

 

 

 

310,000

 

 

 

550,001

 

 

 

355,313

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

726,584

 

 

 

13,832

 

 

 

2,605,730

 

  Ivonne M. Cabrera

  Senior Vice President &

  General Counsel

 

 

2018

 

 

540,000

 

 

 

434,000

 

 

 

319,987

 

 

 

360,455

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

177,611

 

 

 

18,672

 

 

 

1,850,725

 

  Jay L. Kloosterboer

  Senior Vice President,

  Human Resources

 

2018

 

 

540,000

 

 

 

434,000

 

 

 

319,987

 

 

 

360,455

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

37,317

 

 

 

19,759

 

 

 

1,711,518

 

  Name and Principal Position Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)(1)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Option
Awards
($)(3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(5)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
  

Total

($)

 

  Richard J. Tobin

  President & Chief

  Executive Officer

  2021   1,235,000   2,964,000   5,808,134   3,580,475   0   0   498,251   14,085,860 
  2020   1,217,500   1,722,825   6,024,137   2,674,529   0   0   343,347   11,982,338 
  2019   1,200,000   1,665,000   2,800,022   3,232,903   0   0   251,150   9,149,075 

  Brad M. Cerepak

  Senior Vice President &

  Chief Financial Officer

  2021   731,000   1,169,600   1,452,071   895,111   0   182,670   29,577   4,460,029 
 

 

2020

 

 

 

718,000

 

 

 

679,830

 

 

 

1,505,922

 

 

 

668,627

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

649,315

 

 

 

35,329

 

 

 

4,257,023

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

705,000

 

 

 

740,250

 

 

 

800,006

 

 

 

923,692

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

553,203

 

 

 

37,166

 

 

 

3,759,317

 

  Girish Juneja

  Senior Vice President &

  Chief Digital Officer

  
2021
2020
 
 
  
500,000
491,404
 
 
  
560,000
325,500
 
 
  
341,738
376,533
 
 
  
210,626
167,157
 
 
  
0
0
 
 
  

0

0

 

 

  
51,884
38,967
 
 
  
1,664,248
1,399,561
 
 

  Ivonne M. Cabrera

  Senior Vice President &

  General Counsel

 

 

2021

 

 

 

560,000

 

 

 

627,200

 

 

 

546,632

 

 

 

336,979

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

17,922

 

 

 

2,088,733

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

 

364,560

 

 

 

602,459

 

 

 

267,460

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

648,534

 

 

 

21,616

 

 

 

2,454,629

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

540,000

 

 

 

396,900

 

 

 

319,930

 

 

 

369,480

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

408,519

 

 

 

23,238

 

 

 

2,058,067

 

  Kimberly K. Bors

  Senior Vice President &

  Chief Human Resource Officer

  2021   450,000   504,000   362,136   223,247   0   0   43,615   1,582,998 

 

(1)

Bonus amounts generally represent payments under our AIP for the year indicated, for which payments are made in the first quarter of the following year. The AIP constitutes anon-equity incentive plan under FASB ASC Topic 718. Although they are based on the satisfaction ofpre-established performance targets, AIP amounts are reported in the bonus column rather than thenon-equity incentive plan compensation column to make clear that they are annual bonus payments for the year indicated. Mr. Tobin’s bonus consists of two parts, a one-time make-whole bonus of $1,000,000 and a guaranteed annual bonus of $1,000,000.

(2)

The amounts generally represent (a) the aggregate grant date fair value of performance shares granted during the year indicated, and (b) the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards granted during the year, in each case, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Under FASB ASC Topic 718, the 2016, 2017 and 2018 performance share awards are considered performance and service conditioned. The grant date fair value for the 2016 performance share awards was $48.28, the grant date fair value for the 2017 performance share awards was $66.85, and the grant date fair values for the 2018 performance share awards were $79.75 and $82.09, respectively, for awards granted to Mr. Tobin and awards granted to the other NEOs. The amounts set forth in the table do not correspond to the actual value that might be realized by the named executives. The grant date fair value of the performance share awards granted in 2020 and 2021 is higher than the grant date fair values of the awards granted in 2019 because of the transition from attainment based on internal TSR to attainment based on relative TSR. As market condition awards, the performance share awards granted in 2020 and 2021 were valued using the Monte Carlo simulation model. For a discussion of the assumptions relating to calculation of the cost of equity awards, see Note 15 to the Notes to the Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Under FASB ASC Topic 718, the 2019, 2020 and 2021 performance share awards are considered performance and service conditioned. The grant date fair value for the 2019 performance share awards was $91.20, the grant date fair value for the 2020 performance share awards was $165.71 and the grant date fair value for the 2021 performance share awards was $148.29. The grant date fair value of 2021 RSU awards was $122.73. All RSU grants are eligible for dividend equivalent payments which are paid upon vesting.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 5762


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

 executives. All equity awards outstanding as of May 9, 2018 were adjusted as a result of thespin-off of Apergy to preserve the value of the awards in accordance with the Employee Matters Agreement, dated May 9, 2018, between Dover and Apergy.

The grant date fair values of 2018 RSU awards were $79.75 and $82.09, respectively, for awards granted to Mr. Tobin and awards granted to the other NEOs. All RSU grants are eligible for dividend equivalent payments which are paid upon vesting.

For a discussion of the assumptions relating to calculation of the cost of equity awards, see Note 14 to the Notes to the Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

(3)

The amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of SSAR awards granted during the year indicated, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and do not correspond to the actual value that may be realized by the named executives. The grant date fair value for the 20182021 SSAR awards was calculated using a Black-Scholes value of $15.41$29.08 per SSAR.

(4)

See Note (1) for a discussion of annual bonuses under the AIP asnon-equity incentive plan compensation.

(5)

Amounts represent changes in present value of accumulated benefits under the pension plan and/or PRP during the year indicated. For more information, see “—“Executive Compensation Tables — Pension Benefits through 2018.2021. Mr. Spurgeon’s Change in Pension value is a negative amount of $222,117, so it’s not presented in the table above.

(6)

The amountsAmounts for 2018 for the NEOs are due to $9,625 in2021 represent: (i) 401(k) matching contributions as well asof $10,150 for Mr. Cerepak and Ms. Cabrera and $13,050 for Messrs. Tobin and Juneja, and Ms. Bors, (ii) dividends received on RSUs. The amountsRSUs in the amount of $309,296, $19,427, $4,184 and $7,772 and $685 for 2017Messrs. Tobin, Cerepak, Juneja and Mses. Cabrera and Bors respectively, and (iii) for the NEOs are due to $9,450 in 401(k) matching contributions, as well as dividends received on RSUs. The amounts for 2016 for the NEOs are due to $9,275 in 401(k) matching contributions, as well as dividends received on RSUs. The amount for Mr. Spurgeon includes $1,922 in 2016Messrs. Tobin and $1,386 in 2017 for health club membership reimbursement. The amount for Mr. Kloosterboer includes $1,087 in 2018 for health club membership reimbursement. The amount for Mr. Tobin includes $17,837Juneja, and Ms. Bors, respectively, $136,815 of nonqualified deferred compensation match and $5,096$39,090 of 1% automatic contributions in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan; $26,950 of nonqualified deferred compensation match and $7,700 of 1% automatic contributions in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan; and $23,240 of nonqualified deferred compensation match and $6,640 of 1% automatic contributions in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan, since he doesthey do not participate in the PRP.

CEO Employment Agreement

In connection with the hiring of Mr. Tobin as our CEO, Mr. Tobin and Dover have entered into a three-year employment agreement commencing May 1, 2018. In recognition of Mr. Tobin’s outstanding leadership and contributions to value creation, the agreement was renewed for a three-year period ending May 1, 2024. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Tobin is entitled to an initiala minimum annual base salary for 2018 of $1.2 million and a minimum target annual bonus equal to 125% of his base salary, and the receipt of an annual equity grant for each of Dover’s fiscal years ending during the term of the agreement with a grant date fair value of not less than $7 million. Mr. Tobin’s annual bonus for 2018 was guaranteed to be no less than the target annual bonus,pro-rated for the portion of 2018 on and following the commencement of the term. In addition, duringDuring the term of the employment agreement, Mr. Tobin will also be entitled to employee benefits on the same basis as those generally available to similarly situated executivesexecutive officers of Dover and certain indemnification protections, and Dover reimburse him for his legal expenses incurred inDover.

In connection with negotiation of the employment agreement.

In addition,his hiring, Mr. Tobin received aone-time make-whole equity grant consisting of $6 million in the form of75,971 performance shares, having the same performance and vesting terms as our February 2018 iTSR performance share grants to our other employees, and $13 million in the form of RSUs, which vest in five equal installments on December 15th of each calendar year, starting on December 15, 2018 and ending on December 15, 2022.164,603 RSUs. Mr. Tobin also received aone-time make-whole cash payment of $1,000,000, provided that $1,000,000.

Mr. Tobin is obligatedentitled to repay this amount if he terminates his employment without good reason or if Dover terminates his employment for cause, as such terms are defined in the employment agreement, prior to May 1, 2019,receive certain severance payments and he is required to repay apro-rata portion of this amount if his employment is terminated without good reason or for cause prior to May 1, 2020.

The employment agreement provides thatbenefits in the event Mr. Tobin’shis employment is terminated by Dover without cause or by Mr. Tobinhim for good reason, then he will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to one and one half (1.5) times the sum of his base salary and target bonus, a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination, time-vesting of the one-time make-whole equity awards (with performance shares continuing to be subject to performance

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 58


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

conditions) and a cash payment equal to 18 months’ of COBRA premiums,reason. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in each case, subject to the execution of a general release and compliance with applicable restrictive covenants.

The employment agreement contains an 18 month (or, if termination occurs following the third anniversary of the start date, a 12 month) post-terminationnon-competition andnon-solicitation of employees and customers covenants, a confidentiality covenant, a mutualnon-disparagement covenant, and an assignment of inventions covenant.Control”.

At the end of the term of the agreement, Mr. Tobin will continue to be employed by Dover as anat-will employee and participate in severance and other benefit plans on the same terms as other executives.

CEO Pay Ratio

In 2018, Dover completedWe are providing thespin-off following information about the relationship of Apergy, which reduced itsthe annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our median employee. This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

Under the rules, we are permitted to use the same median employee headcount significantly from that employed for its 2017in calculating the pay ratio calculation. Given this impact, Dover hasre-identifiedas the median employee we identified in fiscal year 2020 for 2018.up to three years if there have been no changes that we reasonably believe would significantly affect this pay ratio disclosure and are permitted to substitute another employee for the median employee in certain circumstances. We believe that there have been no changes to our employee population or compensation arrangements that would result in a significant change to the pay ratio disclosure. However, in fiscal year 2021, there were significant changes in the circumstances of the median employee identified in fiscal year 2020 that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change in our pay ratio disclosure. Therefore, to calculate the pay ratio disclosure for fiscal year 2021, we are using another employee whose compensation is substantially similar to last year’s median employee using the same compensation measure we used to determine the fiscal year 2020 median employee. The date chosen for identifying the median employee was December 31, 2021.

For purposes of this analysis, our global headcount was 24,946 employees (12,984 U.S. and 11,962 non-U.S) as of our December 31, 2021 determination date. Eleven countries were excluded (2.1% of the total workforce) under the permissible

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 63


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

5% exclusion, with employee counts as follows: Argentina (22), Colombia (4), Costa Rica (4), Dominican Republic (53), Indonesia (6), Malaysia (125), Mexico (102), Russian Federation (39), Taiwan (19), Thailand (134), and Turkey (10). After country exclusions, our total headcount was 24,428 employees (12,984 U.S. and 11,444 non-U.S.). As permitted under SEC rules, the global headcount does not include employees from the following companies acquired in December 2021: Acme Cryogenics, Inc. (205 employees) and Engineered Controls International, LLC (725 employees). As is permitted under SECthe rules, to determine our median employee, we chose “base salary” as our consistently applied compensation measure. We estimated annual base salary for hourly workers employed for the entire year using their hourly rate and a reasonable estimate of hours worked for the year. For employees who commenced work during 2018,2021, we annualized their annual base salary. Thirteen countries were excluded (2.7% of the total workforce) under the permissible 5% exclusion when we determined headcount on December 10, 2018, with employee counts as follows: Argentina (28), Austria (3), Costa Rica (17), Czech Republic (42), Dominican Republic (43), Kenya (2), Malaysia (111), Mexico (163), Norway (13), Portugal (12), South Korea (23), Taiwan (24), and Thailand (158). Our headcount was 23,874 employees (11,960 U.S. and 11,914non-U.S.) and after country exclusions 23,235 employees (11,960 U.S. and 11,275non-U.S.). A valid statistical sampling methodology was used to estimate the median base salary of our employees. We then produced a sample of employees who were paid within a 5%0.5% range of that median and selected an employee from within that group as our median employee. We determined that employee’s (Summary Compensation Table) total compensation was $42,889.$48,794 for 2021.

We calculated 20182021 annual total compensation for both our median employee and Mr. Tobin using the same methodology that we use to determine our NEOs’named executive officers’ annual total compensation for the Summary Compensation Table. Because Mr. Tobin became our CEO during 2018, and was the CEO on the determination date of December 10, 2018, we annualized his 2018 compensation by increasing his salary to the amounts he would have received for a full year of service in 2018, so that hisTobin’s total compensation was $28,354,477,$14,085,860 resulting in an estimated ratio of 661:289:1 for CEO pay to median worker pay.

Mr. Tobin’s compensation in 2018 included aone-time, make-whole equity award and cash payment that will not recur in future years. Without the make-whole award, Mr. Tobin’s annualized compensation in 2018 would have been $8,168,700, and would have resulted in an estimated pay ratio of 190:1.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 59


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20182021

All awards listed in the table below have a grant date of May 23, 2018 for Mr. Tobin, and February 9, 201812, 2021 for all other executive officers. All equity awards outstanding as of May 9, 2018 were adjusted asFor a result of thespin-off of Apergy to preserve the valuediscussion of the awards, in accordance with the Employee Matters Agreement, dated May 9, 2018, between Doversee “Compensation Discussion and Apergy.Analysis – Elements of Executive Compensation”.

 

Name Type Estimated Future
Payouts UnderNon-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares of

Stock or

Units

(#)

 

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)

 

Exercise

Price of

Option

Awards

($/Sh)

 

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards

($)

  

Type

 Estimated Future Payouts 
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of

Share of
Stock or
Units

(#)

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of

Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)

 

Exercise

Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)

 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of

Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)

 

Thresh-

old

($)(1)

 

Target

($)

 

Maximum

($)

 

Thresh-

old

(#)(1)

 

Target

(#)

 

Maximum

(#)

  Threshold
($)(1)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)(1)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Richard J. Tobin

 

SSAR (2)

               

 

210,658

 

 

$

79.75

 

 

$

3,071,394

 

 

AIP (2)

 

 

926,250

 

 

 

1,852,500

 

 

 

3,705,000

 

              
Performance

Shares (3)

         

 

93,697

 

 

 

374,788

 

       

$

7,472,336

 

SSAR (3)               

 

123,125

 

 

 

122.73

 

 

 

3,580,475

 

RSU (4)

             

 

182,329

 

     

$

14,540,738

 

Performance
Shares (4)

         

 

27,703

 

 

 

83,109

 

       

 

4,108,078

 

AIP (5)

  

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

3,000,000

 

       

RSU (5)

       

 

13,852

 

   

 

1,700,056

 

Robert A. Livingston

 

SSAR (6)

               

 

21,629

 

 

$

82.09

 

 

$

333,303

 

Performance

Shares (7)

         

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

       

$

0

 

RSU (8)

             

 

3,305

 

     

$

271,307

 

AIP (9)

  

 

1,375,000

 

 

 

2,750,000

 

       

Brad M. Cerepak

 

SSAR (6)

               

 

58,478

 

 

$

82.09

 

 

$

901,146

 

 

AIP (2)

 

 

365,500

 

 

731,000

 

 

 

1,462,000

 

              
Performance

Shares (10)

         

 

4,873

 

 

 

19,492

 

       

$

400,025

 

SSAR (3)

               

 

30,781

 

 

 

122.73

 

 

 

895,111

 

RSU (8)

             

 

4,873

 

     

$

400,025

 

Performance
Shares (4)

         

 

6,926

 

 

 

20,778

 

       

 

1,027,057

 

AIP (11)

  

 

705,000

 

 

 

1,410,000

 

       

RSU (5)

       

 

3,463

 

   

 

425,014

 

William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

 

SSAR (6)

               

 

26,802

 

 

$

82.09

 

 

$

413,019

 

Performance

Shares (10)

         

 

4,020

 

 

 

16,080

 

       

$

330,002

 

RSU (8)

             

 

2,680

 

     

$

220,001

 

AIP (11)

  

 

650,000

 

 

 

1,300,000

 

       

Girish Juneja

 

AIP (2)

 

 

175,000

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

700,000

 

              
SSAR (3)               

 

7,243

 

 

 

122.73

 

 

 

210,626

 

Performance
Shares (4)

         

 

1,630

 

 

 

4,890

 

       

 

241,713

 

RSU (5)

       

 

815

 

   

 

100,025

 

Ivonne M. Cabrera

 

SSAR (6)

               

 

23,391

 

 

$

82.09

 

 

$

360,455

 

 

AIP (2)

 

 

196,000

 

 

392,000

 

 

 

784,000

 

              
Performance

Shares (7)

         

 

1,949

 

 

 

7,796

 

       

$

159,994

 

SSAR (3)

               

 

11,588

 

 

 

122.73

 

 

 

336,979

 

RSU (8)

             

 

1,949

 

     

$

159,994

 

Performance
Shares (4)

         

 

2,607

 

 

 

7,821

 

       

 

386,592

 

AIP (11)

  

 

378,000

 

 

 

756,000

 

       

RSU (5)

             

 

1,304

 

     

 

160,040

 

Jay L. Kloosterboer

 

SSAR (6)

               

 

23,391

 

 

$

82.09

 

 

$

360,455

 

 Performance

Shares (10)

         

 

1,949

 

 

 

7,796

 

       

$

159,994

 

 

RSU (8)

             

 

1,949

 

     

$

159,994

 

 

AIP (11)

   

 

378,000

 

 

 

756,000

 

              

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 64


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

  Name

 

Type

 Estimated Future Payouts 
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of

Share of
Stock or
Units

(#)

  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of

Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)

  

Exercise

Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)

  

Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of

Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)

 
 Thresh-old
($)(1)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Thresh-old
(#)(1)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 

  Kimberly K. Bors

 

AIP (2)

 

 

157,500

 

 

315,000

 

 

 

630,000

 

                            
 SSAR (3)                             

 

7,677

 

 

 

122.73

 

 

 

223,247

 

 

Performance
Shares (4)

                 

 

1,727

 

 

 

5,181

 

             

 

256,097

 

  

RSU (5)

                         

 

864

 

         

 

106,039

 

 

(1)

Represents the minimum amount payable for a certain level of performance. Under each of our plans, there is no guaranteed minimum payment.

(2)

The amounts shown in this row reflect the potential payouts in February 2022 for 2021 under the AIP. The bonus amount actually paid in February 2022 is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in the column “Bonus” for 2021 for the executive officer.

(3)

Represents an award of SSARs under the 2012 LTIP that will not be exercisable until May 23, 2021.February 12, 2024. The grant date fair value was calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, using a Black-Scholes value of $14.58$29.08 per SSAR.

(3)(4)

Represents an award of performance shares under the 2012 LTIP. The performance shares vest and become payable after the three-year performance period ending December 31, 20202023 subject to the achievement of the applicable performance goal. The

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 60


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

performance share awards are considered performance and servicemarket condition awards per FASB ASC 718 and the grant date fair value for the awards was $148.29 per share, calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation model in accordance with FASB ASC 718, using a value of $79.75 per share. Includes a one-time make-whole grant of 75,971 performance shares to Mr. Tobin per the terms of the employment agreement.718.

(4)(5)

Represents an award of RSUs under the 2012 LTIP made on May 23, 2018.February 12, 2021. The grant consists of 17,726 RSUs which vestvests in three equal annual installments beginning on March 15, 2019, and 164,603 RSUs, part of a one-time make-whole grant to Mr. Tobin per the terms of the employment agreement, which vest in five equal installments beginning on December 15, 2018.2022. The grant date fair value for the awards were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, using a value of $79.75$122.73 per share.

(5)

The amounts shown in this row reflect the potential payouts for 2018 under the AIP for Mr. Tobin as if he was employed a full year. A prorated bonus amount of $1,000,000 was paid to Mr. Tobin in December 2018 per the terms of the employment agreement.

(6)

Represents an award of SSARs under the LTIP that will not be exercisable until February 9, 2021. The grant date fair value was calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, using a Black-Scholes value of $15.41 per SSAR.

(7)

Represents an award of performance shares under the LTIP. Due to his retirement on April 30, 2018, Mr. Livingston’s 2018 performance share grant did not vest and he did not receive a payout from such grant.

(8)

Represents an award of RSUs under the LTIP made on February 9, 2018. The grant vests in three equal annual installments beginning on March 15, 2019. The grant date fair value for the awards were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, using a value of $82.09 per share.

(9)

The amounts shown in this row reflect the potential payouts in February 2019 for 2018 under the AIP. Due to his retirement on April 30, 2018, Mr. Livingston did not earn a bonus for 2018.

(10)

Represents an award of performance shares under the LTIP. The performance shares vest and become payable after the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2020 subject to the achievement of the applicable performance goal. The performance share awards are considered performance and service awards per FASB ASC 718 and the grant date fair value for the awards was calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, using a value of $82.09 per share.

(11)

The amounts shown in this row reflect the potential payouts in February 2019 for 2018 under the AIP. The bonus amount actually paid in February 2019 is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in the column “Bonus” for 2018 for the executive officer.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 6165


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End 20182021

Awards listed below with grant dates beginning in 2013 were made under the LTIP. Awards listed below with grant dates between 2006 through 2012 were made under the 2005 Plan.LTIP. All equity awards outstanding as of May 9, 2018 were adjusted as a result of thespin-off of Apergy to preserve the value of the awards in accordance with the Employee Matters Agreement, dated May 9, 2018, between Dover and Apergy.

Effective May 7, 2021, we adopted the 2021 LTIP. All future grants of equity awards will be made under the 2021 LTIP.

   
  Name 

Option Awards

  

Stock Awards

 
 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)

Unvested

  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units

of Stock

That Have

Not
Vested (#)

  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not

Vested ($)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other Rights
That Have
not
Vested (#)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:

Market or
Payout
Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
Have not
Vested ($)

 

  Richard J. Tobin

     

 

210,658

(1) 

 

 

79.75

 

  

 

5/23/2028

 

                
                  

 

131,683

(11) 

 

 

9,342,909

(16) 

 

 

75,971

(17) 

 

 

5,390,142

(20) 

      

 

17,726

(12) 

 

 

1,257,660

(16) 

 

 

17,726

(17) 

 

 

1,257,660

(20) 

  Robert A. Livingston

     

 

21,629

(2) 

 

 

82.09

 

  

 

4/30/2023

 

                
     

 

242,348

(3) 

 

 

66.85

 

  

 

4/30/2023

 

                
     

 

323,174

(4) 

 

 

48.28

 

  

 

4/30/2023

 

                
 

 

252,480

(5) 

     

 

61.79

 

  

 

4/30/2023

 

                
 

 

224,236

(6) 

     

 

69.57

 

  

 

4/30/2023

 

                
 

 

348,340

(7) 

     

 

53.40

 

  

 

2/14/2023

 

                
                  

 

3,305

(13) 

 

 

234,490

(16) 

        
                  

 

13,463

(14) 

 

 

955,200

(16) 

        
      

 

8,976

(15) 

 

 

636,847

(16) 

  

  Brad M. Cerepak

     

 

58,478

(2) 

 

 

82.09

 

  

 

2/9/2028

 

                
     

 

71,806

(3) 

 

 

66.85

 

  

 

2/10/2027

 

                
     

 

91,981

(4) 

 

 

48.28

 

  

 

2/11/2026

 

                
 

 

71,860

(5) 

     

 

61.79

 

  

 

2/12/2025

 

                
 

 

60,371

(6) 

     

 

69.57

 

  

 

3/10/2024

 

                
 

 

93,732

(7) 

     

 

53.40

 

  

 

2/14/2023

 

                
 

 

56,605

(8) 

     

 

48.59

 

  

 

2/9/2022

 

                
 

 

44,462

(9) 

     

 

49.49

 

  

 

2/10/2021

 

                
                  

 

4,873

(13) 

 

 

345,739

(16) 

 

 

4,873

(18) 

 

 

345,739

(20) 

                  

 

3,989

(14) 

 

 

283,020

(16) 

 

 

5,983

(19) 

 

 

424,494

(20) 

      

 

2,555

(15) 

 

 

181,277

(16) 

  

  William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

     

 

26,802

(2) 

 

 

82.09

 

  

 

2/9/2028

 

                
     

 

32,911

(3) 

 

 

66.85

 

  

 

2/10/2027

 

                
     

 

45,575

(4) 

 

 

48.28

 

  

 

2/11/2026

 

                
 

 

35,606

(5) 

     

 

61.79

 

  

 

2/12/2025

 

                
 

 

28,747

(6) 

     

 

69.57

 

  

 

3/10/2024

 

                
 

 

33,709

(7) 

     

 

53.40

 

  

 

2/14/2023

 

                
                  

 

2,680

(13) 

 

 

190,146

(16) 

 

 

4,020

(18) 

 

 

285,219

(20) 

                  

 

2,194

(14) 

 

 

155,664

(16) 

 

 

4,936

(19) 

 

 

350,209

(20) 

                  

 

1,519

(15) 

 

 

107,773

(16) 

        

Option AwardsStock Awards
  NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Prices
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
not Vested (#)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have not
Vested ($)

  Richard J. Tobin

123,125 (1)122.732/12/2031
118,657 (2)119.862/14/2030
184,211 (3)91.202/15/2029
210,658 (4)79.755/23/2028
13,852 (11)2,515,523 (15)27,703 (16)5,030,865 (18)
8,900 (12)1,616,240 (15)26,698 (17)4,848,357 (18)
5,117 (13)929,247 (15)
32,923 (14)5,978,817 (15)

  Brad M. Cerepak

30,781 (1)122.732/12/2031
29,664 (2)119.862/14/2030
52,632 (3)91.202/15/2029
58,478 (5)82.092/9/2028
71,806 (6)66.852/10/2027
91,981 (7)48.282/11/2026
71,860 (8)61.792/12/2025
3,463 (11)628,881 (15)6,926 (16)1,257,762 (18)
2,225 (12)404,060 (15)6,674 (17)1,211,998 (18)
1,462 (13)265,499 (15)

  Girish Juneja

7,243 (1)122.732/12/2031
7,416 (2)119.862/14/2030
11,842 (3)91.202/15/2029
11,695 (5)82.092/9/2028
815 (11)148,004 (15)1,630 (16)296,008 (18)
556 (12)100,970 (15)1,669 (17)303,090 (18)
329 (13)59,746 (15)

  Ivonne M. Cabrera

11,588 (1

122.73

2/12/2031

11,866 (2

119.86

2/14/2030

21,053 (3

91.20

2/15/2029

23,391 (5

82.09

2/9/2028

28,722 (6

66.85

2/10/2027

39,775 (7

48.28

2/11/2026

31,074 (8

61.79

2/12/2025

25,873 (9

69.57

3/10/2024

28,841 (10

53.40

2/14/2023

1,304 (11

236,806 (15

2,607 (16

473,431 (18

890 (12

161,624 (15

2,670 (17

484,872 (18

585 (13

106,236 (15

  Kimberly K. Bors

7,677 (1

122.73

2/12/2031

7,416 (2

119.86

2/14/2030

864 (11

156,902 (15

1,727 (16

313,623 (18

556 (12

100,970 (15

1,669 (17

303,090 (18

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 6266


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

   
  Name 

Option Awards

  

Stock Awards

 
 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)

Unvested

  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units

of Stock

That Have

Not
Vested (#)

  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not

Vested ($)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other Rights
That Have
not
Vested (#)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:

Market or
Payout
Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
Have not
Vested ($)

 

  Ivonne M. Cabrera

     

 

23,391

(2) 

 

 

82.09

 

  

 

2/9/2028

 

                
     

 

28,722

(3) 

 

 

66.85

 

  

 

2/10/2027

 

                
     

 

39,775

(4) 

 

 

48.28

 

  

 

2/11/2026

 

                
 

 

31,074

(5) 

     

 

61.79

 

  

 

2/12/2025

 

                
 

 

25,873

(6) 

     

 

69.57

 

  

 

3/10/2024

 

                
 

 

28,841

(7) 

     

 

53.40

 

  

 

2/14/2023

 

                
 

 

9,880

(8) 

     

 

48.59

 

  

 

2/9/2022

 

                
 

 

13,337

(9) 

     

 

49.49

 

  

 

2/10/2021

 

                
 

 

20,713

(10) 

     

 

31.87

 

  

 

2/11/2020

 

                
                  

 

1,949

(13) 

 

 

138,282

(16) 

 

 

1,949

(18) 

 

 

138,282

(20) 

                  

 

1,596

(14) 

 

 

113,236

(16) 

 

 

2,393

(19) 

 

 

169,783

(20) 

      

 

1,105

(15) 

 

 

78,400

(16) 

  

  Jay L. Kloosterboer

     

 

23,391

(2) 

 

 

82.09

 

  

 

2/9/2028

 

                
     

 

28,722

(3) 

 

 

66.85

 

  

 

2/10/2027

 

                
     

 

39,775

(4) 

 

 

48.28

 

  

 

2/11/2026

 

                
 

 

31,074

(5) 

     

 

61.79

 

  

 

2/12/2025

 

                
 

 

27,598

(6) 

     

 

69.57

 

  

 

3/10/2024

 

                
 

 

32,960

(7) 

     

 

53.40

 

  

 

2/14/2023

 

                
                  

 

1,949

(13) 

 

 

138,282

(16) 

 

 

1,949

(18) 

 

 

138,282

(20) 

                  

 

1,596

(14) 

 

 

113,236

(16) 

 

 

2,393

(19) 

 

 

169,783

(20) 

                  

 

1,105

(15) 

 

 

78,400

(16) 

        

(1)

SSARs granted on February 12, 2021 that are not exercisable until February 12, 2024.

(2)

SSARs granted on February 14, 2020 that are not exercisable until February 14, 2023.

(3)

SSARs granted on February 15, 2019 that became exercisable on February 15, 2022.

(4)

SSARs granted on May 23, 2018 that became exercisable on May 23, 2021.

(2)(5)

SSARs granted on February 9, 2018 that are notbecame exercisable untilon February 9, 2021.

(3)(6)

SSARs granted on February 10, 2017 that are notbecame exercisable untilon February 10, 2020.

(4)(7)

SSARs granted on February 11, 2016 that became exercisable on February 11, 2019.

(5)(8)

SSARs granted on February 12, 2015 that became exercisable on February 12, 2018.

(6)(9)

SSARs granted on March 10, 2014 that became exercisable on March 10, 2017.

(7)(10)

SSARs granted on February 14, 2013 that became exercisable on February 14, 2016.

(8)(11)

SSARsUnvested RSUs granted on February 9, 2012 that became exercisable12, 2021. The units vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 9, 2015.March 15, 2022

(9)(12)

SSARsUnvested portion of RSUs granted on February 10, 2011 that became exercisable14, 2020. The units vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 10, 2014.March 15, 2021

(10)(13)

SSARsUnvested portion of RSUs granted on February 11, 2010 that became exercisable15, 2019. The units vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 11, 2013.March 15, 2020.

(11)(14)

Unvested portion of RSUs granted on May 23, 2018. The units vest in five equal annual installments beginning on December 15, 2018.

(12)

Unvested portion of RSUs granted on May 23, 2018. The units vest in three equal annual installments beginning on March 15, 2019.

(13)

Unvested portion of RSUs granted on February 9, 2018. The units vest in three equal annual installments beginning on March 15, 2019.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 63


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

(14)

Unvested portion of RSUs granted on February 10, 2017. The units vest in three equal annual installments beginning on March 15, 2018.

(15)

Unvested portion of RSUs granted on February 11, 2016. The units vest in three equal annual installments beginning on March 15, 2017.

(16)

The amount reflects the number of units granted multiplied by $70.95,$181.60, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2018.2021.

(17)(16)

Performance shares granted on May 23, 2018February 12, 2021 become payable after December 31, 20202023 subject to the achievement of the applicable performance goal. The amount reflected in the table represents the number of shares payable based on achievement of the target level of performance (100%).

(18)(17)

Performance shares granted on February 9, 201814, 2020 become payable after December 31, 20202022 subject to the achievement of the applicable performance goal. The amount reflected in the table represents the number of shares payable based on achievement of the target level of performance (100%).

(19)

Performance shares granted on February 10, 2017 become payable after December 31, 2019 subject to the achievement of the applicable performance goal. The amount reflected in the table represents the number of shares payable based on achievement of the target level of performance (100%).

(20)(18)

The amount reflects the number of performance shares payable based on achievement of the target level of performance multiplied by $70.95,$181.60, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2018.2021.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20182021

 

Name  Option Awards     Stock Awards  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)(1)
   

Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(2)

        

Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(3)

   

Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(4)

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on

Exercise (#)(1)

  

Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(2)

     

Number of Shares
Acquired on

Vesting (#)(3)

  

Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(4)

Richard J. Tobin

       

32,920

  

2,538,626

        

 

94,449

 

  

 

16,041,842

 

Robert A. Livingston

  

1,124,319

  

49,529,457

   

19,159

  

1,893,772

Brad M. Cerepak

  

     69,047

  

  3,211,031

   

  5,518

  

   545,442

  

 

60,371

 

  

 

6,409,891

 

    

 

  17,357

 

  

 

  2,954,804

 

William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

       

  5,438

  

   475,277

Girish Juneja

        

 

    3,893

 

  

 

     663,193

 

Ivonne M. Cabrera

       

  2,332

  

   230,501

  

 

9,880

 

  

 

784,423

 

    

 

    6,942

 

  

 

     1,181,758

 

Jay L. Kloosterboer

  

     67,308

  

  2,036,513

    

  2,332

  

   230,501

Kimberly K. Bors

           

 

278

 

  

 

37,427

 

 

(1)

Represents exercise of SSARs; number of shares reported as acquired is the total number of shares underlying the SSAR, rather than the net number of shares received by the NEO.

(2)

The “value realized on exercise” provided in the table represents the difference between the average of the high and low trading price on the exercise date and the exercise or base price, multiplied by the number of shares acquired upon exercise of the award.

(3)

This column represents the vesting of a portion of the 2015, 2016,2018, 2019, and 20172020 grants of RSUs for Messrs. Livingston,Tobin, Cerepak, Spurgeon and KloosterboerJuneja, and Ms. Cabrera. For Mr. Spurgeon, the column also representsCabrera as well as a Performance Shareperformance share payout in addition to RSUs, for the performance period ended December 31, 2018.2021. This column also represents the vesting of a portion of the 2020 grants of RSUs for Ms. Bors. For Mr. Tobin, this column also represents the vesting of a portion of the May 23, 2018 one-time make-whole grant of RSUs. The number of shares reported as acquired is the full number of RSUs shares of restricted stock vested or performance shares paid out, not the net number of shares received by the NEO after withholding shares for satisfaction of taxes.

(4)

This value represents the difference between the average of the high and low trading price on the date of vesting multiplied by the number of RSUs and for Mr. Spurgeon avesting plus the number of performance share payout, in addition to RSUs,shares paid for the period ended December 31, 20182021 multiplied by $70.95,$181.60, the closing price of our stock on December 31, 2018.2021.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 6467


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

Pension Benefits through 20182021

 

  Name Plan Name  

Number of
Years Credited
Service

(#)

   

Normal
Retirement
Age

(#)

   

Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit

($)(1)

   Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
 

 Richard J. Tobin (2)

 

 

Pension Plan

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

PRP

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 Robert A. Livingston (3), (4)

 

 

Pension Plan

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

572,659

 

 

 

 

 

PRP

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

4,089,510

 

 

 

  

 

 

12,877,327

 

 

 

 Brad M. Cerepak

 

 

Pension Plan

 

  

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

364,112

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

PRP

 

  

 

 

9.6

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

1,504,502

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 William W. Spurgeon, Jr. (5), (6)

 

 

Pension Plan

 

  

 

 

26.0

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

950,019

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

PRP

 

  

 

 

25.9

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

6,109,316

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 Ivonne M. Cabrera (5), (7)

 

 

Pension Plan

 

  

 

 

15.6

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

395,806

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

PRP

 

  

 

 

14.9

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

903,480

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 Jay L. Kloosterboer

 

 

Pension Plan

 

  

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

341,829

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

PRP

 

  

 

 

10.0

 

 

  

 

 

65

 

 

 

  

 

 

754,155

 

 

 

  

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

  Name  Plan Name  Number of
Years Credited
Service (#)
   Normal
Retirement
Age (#)
   Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit ($)(1)
   Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year ($)
 

Richard J. Tobin (2)

  

Pension Plan

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

PRP

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

Brad M. Cerepak

  

Pension Plan

  

 

13.0

 

  

 

65

 

  

 

659,470

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

PRP

  

 

12.6

 

  

 

65

 

  

 

2,594,332

 

  

 

N/A

 

Girish Juneja (2)

  

Pension Plan

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

PRP

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

Ivonne M. Cabrera (3)

  

Pension Plan

  

 

18.6

 

  

 

65

 

  

 

730,962

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

PRP

  

 

17.9

 

  

 

65

 

  

 

1,555,674

 

  

 

N/A

 

Kimberly K. Bors

  

Pension Plan

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

PRP

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

 

 

(1)

This amount was earned by the NEONEOs over his or her years of service. TheFor Mr. Cerepak and Ms. Cabrera, the present value of benefits was calculated assuming that the executive will receive a single lump sum payment upon retirement at the later of his or her current age or age 65.

(2)

Mr. Tobin, isMr. Juneja and Ms. Bors are not eligible to participate in the Dover pension plan or the PRP, since the pension plan and the PRP were closed to new employees on December 31.31, 2013.

(3)

Mr. Livingston retired during 2018 and received a full distribution of his Dover pension plan benefits and a 75% distribution of his PRP benefit.

(4)

Mr. Livingston’s PRP service was capped at 30 years per the plan document.

(5)

EligibleMs. Cabrera is eligible to retire with the portion of theirher PRP benefit accrued through December 31, 2009 payable unreduced at age 62 with 10 years of service.

(6)

service, and the portion of her PRP benefit accrued from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2021 payable unreduced at age 65. The present value of Mr. Spurgeon’sher PRP benefits assuming age 62 retirement age is $7,310,664.

(7)

The present value of Ms. Cabrera’s PRP benefits assuming age 62 retirement age is $1,073,908.$1,772,744.

The amounts shown in the Pension Benefits table above are actuarial present values of the benefits accumulated through December 31, 2018.2021. An actuarial present value is calculated by estimating expected future payments starting at an assumed retirement age, weighting the estimated payments by the estimated probability of surviving to each post-retirement age, and discounting the weighted payments at an assumed discount rate to reflect the time value of money. The actuarial present value represents an estimate of the amount which, if invested today at the assumed discount rate, would be sufficient on an average basis to provide estimated future payments totaling the current accumulated benefit. For purposes of the table, the assumed retirement age for each NEO is 65, the normal retirement age under each plan. Actual benefit present values will vary from these estimates depending on many factors, including an executive’s actual retirement age.

Pension Plan

We have a pension plan for which eligible Dover employees, and the salaried employees of our participating subsidiaries, were eligible to become participants after they completed one year of service. Benefits under the pension plan for Dover employees, including those for the applicable NEOs, are determined by multiplying a participant’s years of

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 65


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

credited service (up to a maximum of 35 years) by a percentage of their final average compensation, subject to statutory limits applicable totax-qualified pension plans. Benefits for a number of the participating subsidiaries are determined under different benefit formulae.

Pension plan participants generally vest in their benefits after five years of employment or, if earlier, upon reaching age 65, which is the normal retirement age under the plan. All NEOs who participate in the pension plan are vested in their pension plan benefits and are eligible to begin receiving reduced benefits if their employment terminates before normal retirement age.

Effective December 31, 2013, the pension plan is closed to new employees. All pension eligible employees as of December 31, 2013 will continue to earn pension benefits through December 31, 2023 as long as they remain employed by an operating company participating in the plan. It is Dover’s present intention to eliminate any future benefit accruals after December 31, 2023.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 68


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Pension Replacement Plan

We also maintain the PRP, which is anon-qualified plan for tax purposes, to provide benefits to certain employees whose compensation and pension plan benefits are greater than the compensation and benefit limits applicable totax-qualified pension plans. Prior to January 1, 2010, our plan which providednon-qualified retirement benefits was the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). Effective January 1, 2010, the SERP was amended to provide reduced benefits that are more consistent with the benefits provided under the pension plan and its name was changed to the PRP.

Employees are eligible to participate in the PRP if they hold certain positions within Dover, or its subsidiaries, are U.S. taxpayers and earn more than a set percentage above the Internal Revenue Code’s compensation limits fortax-qualified pension plans. Dover’s CEO may designate other employees as eligible and may revoke the eligibility of participants.

The formula for determining benefits accrued under the PRP after December 31, 2009, before offsets, is determined using the same benefit formula as under the pension plan, except that the Internal Revenue Code’s limits on compensation and benefits applicable totax-qualified pension plans will not apply. Benefits under the former SERP, before offsets, were determined by multiplying the participant’s years of actual service with Dover companies, plus, in limited cases, prior service credit by a percentage of the participant’s final average compensation as defined under the plan.

Benefits payable under the PRP or SERP are reduced by the amount of Company-provided benefits under any other retirement plans, including the pension plan, as well as the Company-paid portion of social security benefits. PRP participants must complete five years of service to vest in their benefits. All NEOs who participate in the PRP are fully vested in their benefits and will commence receiving benefits upon termination of employment. PRP benefits may be forfeited for “cause” (defined as conviction of a felony which places a Dover company at legal or other risk or is expected to cause substantial harm to the business of a Dover company or its relationships with employees, distributors, customers or suppliers).

Normal retirement age for purposes of the PRP is age 65. Certain employees who were participants on or before March 1, 2010 will be entitled to receive the portion of their benefits that accrued through December 31, 2009 without any reduction due to early retirement if they retire after they reach age 62 and complete 10 years of service. Generally, benefits accrued after December 31, 2009 will be subject to early retirement reduction factors consistent with the reduction factors in the pension plan.

Effective December 31, 2013, the PRP is closed to new employees. All eligible employees as of December 31, 2013 will continue to earn to their PRP benefits through December 31, 2023 as long as they remain employed by Dover and its affiliates. It is Dover’s intention to eliminate any future benefit accruals after December 31, 2023, consistent with the freezing of benefit accruals under the pension plan.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 66


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 20182021

 

Name Plan Name 

Executive

contributions

in last FY

($)(1)

 

Registrant

contributions

in last FY

($)

 

Aggregate

earnings
in last FY

($)

 

Aggregate
withdrawals/

distributions

($)

 

Aggregate

balance
at last FYE

($)

   Plan Name  

Executive

contributions

in last FY

($)(1)

   

Registrant

contributions

in last FY

($)

   

Aggregate

earnings
in last FY

($)

   

Aggregate
withdrawals/

distributions

($)

   

Aggregate

balance
at last FYE

($)

 

Richard J. Tobin

 Deferred

Compensation Plan

  171,154   N/A   (12,585  N/A   158,569   Deferred

Compensation Plan

   1,048,206    116,845    47,504    N/A    2,978,962 

Robert A. Livingston

 Deferred

Compensation Plan

  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Executive Deferred
Income Plan (2)
  N/A   N/A   13,115   2,972   412,616 

Brad M. Cerepak

 Deferred

Compensation Plan

  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   Deferred

Compensation Plan

   N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A 

William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

 Deferred

Compensation Plan

  258,833   N/A   (266,865  N/A   2,558,772 

Girish Juneja

  Deferred

Compensation Plan

   564,108    20,604    57,348    N/A    2,208,499 

Ivonne M. Cabrera

 Deferred

Compensation Plan

  N/A   N/A   (14,452  N/A   110,562   Deferred

Compensation Plan

   N/A    N/A    40,416    N/A    212,351 

Jay L. Kloosterboer

 Deferred

Compensation Plan

  N/A   N/A   (714  N/A   60,129 

Kimberly K. Bors

  Deferred

Compensation Plan

   44,577    1,477    2,620    N/A    75,289 

 

(1)

If any amounts were shown as executive contributions in 2018,2021, they would be included in the Summary Compensation Table in the salary or bonus ornon-equity incentive plan compensation columns, as appropriate, for the respective officers.

(2)

In 1984-1985, we offered our executive officers an executive deferred income plan (“EDIP”). Mr. Livingston participated in the EDIP, pursuant to which he elected to defer certain income during the period 1985-1988. Because Mr. Livingston reached age 65 and retired in 2018, he was entitled to begin receiving repayment of the deferred amount, together with interest, beginning in 2018 and continuing thereafter for a period of fifteen years. Accordingly, Mr. Livingston received his first payment of $2,972 following his retirement in 2018.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 69


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Our deferred compensation plan is a nonqualified plan that permits select key management and highly compensated employees on a U.S. payroll with an annual salary equal to or greater than $175,000 for 2021 deferrals and $250,000 for 2022 deferrals to irrevocably elect to defer a portion of their salary and bonus. The deferred compensation plan provides participants who are not eligible to participate in the Pension Replacement PlanPRP with the same level of matching and other employer contributions that they would have received if certain compensation limits under our Retirement Savings plan did not apply. Our NEOsOnly Mr. Cerepak and Ms. Cabrera participate in the Pension Replacement PlanPRP and are therefore not eligible to receive matching and other employer contributions under the deferred compensation plan. AsThe plan, as amended the planeffective January 1, 2022, operates similar to an “excess” deferred compensation plan in that it provides for employer contributions on salary and bonuses in excess of the compensation limit permitted under thetax-qualified retirement savings plan.

Under the amended deferred compensation plan, an eligible participant’s account will be credited each year with matchingautomatic employer contributions onequal to 4.5% of the amount by which the eligible participant’s salary and bonus deferredexceed the limitation imposed under the plan eachInternal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) for such year on or after January 1, 2014, at the same rate as under our retirement savings plan plus additional employer contributions at the same rate that the participant’s business unit makes “automatic” contributions under our retirement savings plan each year.

Amounts deferred under the plan are credited with hypothetical investment earnings based on the participant’s investment elections made from among investment options designated under the plan. Participants are 100% vested in all amounts they defer, as adjusted for any earnings and losses on such deferred amounts. Effective as of January 1, 2010, a hypothetical investment option that tracks the value of Dover common stock, including any dividend payments, was added to the plan. This Dover stock unit fund does not actually hold any Dover stock, and

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 67


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

participants who elect to participate in this option do not own any Dover common stock, or have any voting or other rights associated with the ownership of our common stock. Participants’ accounts are credited with the net returns of shares of our common stock equal to the number of stock units held by the participant. All distributions from the stock unit fund will be paid in cash. Balances allocated into the stock unit fund must remain in the stock unit fund for the remainder of the participant’s participation in the plan.

Generally, deferred amounts will be distributed from the plan only on account of retirement at age 65 (or age 55 with 10 years of service), disability or other termination of service, or at a scheduledin-service withdrawal date chosen by the participant.

Potential Payments upon Termination orChange-in-Control Change in Control

The discussion and tablestable below describe the incremental payments or values to which each of the NEOs would be entitled in the event of termination of such executive’s employment or achange-in-control.

In November 2010, Dover adopted change in control. The only compensation plans under which an executive severance plan (the “severance plan”) and senior executive CIC severance plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Other Compensation Programs and Policies” for a description of the plans. The severance plan creates a consistent and transparent severance policy for determining benefits for all similarly-situated executives and formalizes Dover’s current executive severance practices. All of our executives, including our NEOs,may be entitled to incremental payments are eligible to participate in the severance plan. The CIC severance plan likewise establishes a consistent policy regarding double-triggerchange-in-control severance payments based on current market practices. The CIC severance plan applies to all executives who are subject to Dover’s senior executive shareholding guidelines on the date of achange-in-control (as defined in the plan), including all NEOs. Each of the severance plan, the CIC Severance Plan and the CIC severance plan gives Dover the right to recover amounts paid to an executive2012 and 2021 LTIP. No incremental values would be payable under the PRP, pension plan as required under any clawback policy of Dover as in effect from time to time or under applicable law.

The 2005 Plan, the LTIP and Dover’s other benefit plans each have their own provisions relating to rights and obligations under thedeferred compensation plan upon termination.

The table below shows the aggregate amount of potential payments and other benefits that each NEO would have been entitled to receive if his employment had terminated in certain circumstances, other than as a result of achange-in-control, on December 31, 2018. The amounts shown assume that termination was effective as of December 31, 2018, include amounts earned through such timeevent or change in control.

Voluntary termination. If an NEO voluntarily terminates his or her employment, he or she will not be entitled to any incremental payments and are estimates ofunvested equity awards will be forfeited, unless the amounts which could have been paid out to the executives upon their termination at that time. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of each executive’s separation from our Company. Annual bonuses are discretionary and are therefore omitted from the tables. No NEO wasexecutive is eligible for normal retirement as of December 31, 2018 so we have omitted that column from the table. As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Spurgeon is eligible foror early retirement under the Rule2012 and 2021 LTIP as discussed below.

Involuntary termination without cause. If Dover terminates the employment of 70 (as defined below)an NEO without cause (excluding termination due to death or disability), the NEO will be entitled to a cash severance payment under the 2005 Plan and LTIPseverance plan consisting of:

An amount equal to base salary plus target annual cash bonus for 12 months following the date of termination;

A pro rata portion (based on the completed calendar months worked in respectthe year of termination) of the NEO’s target annual incentive bonus payable for the year of termination, subject to all awardspotential reduction in the discretion of the Compensation Committee based upon attainment of the applicable performance criteria;

A pro rata performance share award granted prior to August 6, 2014, and the Rule of 65 under the 2012 or 2021 LTIP for awards grantedhaving a scheduled payment date next following the date of termination (based on or after August 6, 2014. Mr. Livingston retired as of April 30, 2018, prior toyear-end and, accordingly, he is not includedthe completed calendar months worked in the tables below. Mr. Tobin is obligated to repay the $1,000,000 cash payment he received as partyear of his one-time make-whole grant if he terminates his employment without good reason or if Dover terminates his employment for cause, as such terms are defined in the employment agreement, prior to May 1, 2019, and he is required to repay apro-rata portion of this amount if his employment is terminated without good reason or for cause prior to May 1, 2020. For a discussiontermination) based upon attainment of the special termination provisionsperformance criteria applicable to Mr. Tobin pursuantthe award as determined by the Compensation Committee;

Outplacement services, at the company’s discretion, for 12 months up to his employment agreement, see “CEO Employment Agreement” on page 58.

Normal retirement is defined as (i) age 65 under the pension plan and PRP (however, as noted in the PRP plan description, Mr. Spurgeon and Ms. Cabrera can receive an unreduced portiona maximum cost of their PRP benefit as of age 62), (ii) age 65 (or 55 with 10 years of service) under the deferred compensation plan,$25,000; and (iii) age 62 under the LTIP for awards prior to August 6, 2014 and 65 for all grants thereafter. Early retirement is defined in each of the deferred compensation plan, the PRP and the pension plan as described in the applicable plan description above.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 6870


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

With respectA lump sum payment equal to the then cost of COBRA health continuation coverage, based on the level of health care coverage in effect on the termination date, for 12 months.

Unvested equity awards will be forfeited.

Retirement (for awards made in 2020 and earlier). Under the 2012 LTIP, an NEO eligible for normal or early retirement will be entitled to continued vesting of SSARs and restricted stock unit awards for 24 months in the case of early retirement under the LTIP,Rule of 65, 36 months in the case of early retirement under the Rule of 70 and 60 months in the case of normal retirement at or after age 65. In the case of normal retirement, the outstanding performance share awards for the performance period ending the soonest will continue to vest, subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance targets. In the case of early retirement under the Rule of 65 or 70, outstanding performance share awards are payable, subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance targets, only at the Compensation Committee’s discretion.

Early retirement under the 2012 LTIP is defined as termination for any reason other than normal retirement, death, disability or cause, under one of the following circumstances:circumstances applicable to the NEOs:

 

The executive has at least 10 years of service with a Dover company, the sum of his or her age and years of service on the date of termination equals at least 65, and for awards granted on or after August 6, 2014, is at least 55 years old (the “Rule of 65”), and the executive complies with certain notice requirements; or

 

The executive has at least 15 years of service with a Dover company, the sum of his or her age and years of service on the date of termination equals at least 70, and for awards granted on or after August 6, 2014, is at least 60 years old (the “Rule of 70”), and the executive complies with certain notice requirements; or

The executive’s employment terminates because the company or line of business in which he or she is employed is sold and the executive remains employed in good standing through the closing date of the sale (“sale of a company”).requirements.

Any person who takes early or normal retirement under the 2012 LTIP is deemed to have expressly agreed that he or she will not compete with us on the following terms: the participant will not compete with us or any of our companies at which he or she was employed within the three years immediately prior to his or her termination, in the geographic areas in which we or that company actively carried on business at the end of the participant’s employment, for the period during which such retirement affords him or her enhanced benefits.

DOVER CORPORATION – 2019 Proxy Statement 69


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

benefits (24 months in the case of the Rule of 65, 36 months in the case of the Rule of 70 or 60 months in the case of normal retirement). If the participant fails to comply with thenon-compete provision, he or she forfeits theany enhanced benefits referred to aboveunder the 2012 LTIP and must return to Dover the economic value previously realized by reason of such benefits.

    

Voluntary

Termination

($)(1)

  

Involuntary Not for

Cause Termination

($)(2)

  

For Cause

Termination

($)(3)

  

Early Retirement
under
Rule of 65 or 70

($)

 Richard J. Tobin

            

 Cash severance (4)

  

N/A

  

4,050,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Performance share award (5)

  

0

  

5,390,142

  

0

  

N/A

 Stock options/SSARs (6)

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Restricted Stock Units (7)

  

0

  

9,342,909

  

0

  

N/A

 Retirement plan payments (8)

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Deferred comp plan

  

158,569

  

158,569

  

158,569

  

N/A

 Health and welfare benefits (10)

  

0

  

35,598

  

0

  

N/A

 Outplacement

  

N/A

  

10,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Total:

  

158,569

  

18,987,218

  

158,569

  

N/A

 Brad M. Cerepak

            

 Cash severance (4)

  

N/A

  

1,675,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Performance share award (5)

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Stock options/SSARs (6)

  

4,606,389

  

4,606,389

  

0

  

N/A

 Restricted Stock Units (7)

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Retirement plan payments (8)

  

1,743,926

  

1,743,926

  

353,975

  

N/A

 Deferred comp plan

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Health and welfare benefits (10)

  

0

  

23,732

  

0

  

N/A

 Outplacement

  

N/A

  

10,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Total:

  

6,350,315

  

8,059,047

  

353,975

  

N/A

 William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

            

 Cash severance (4)

  

N/A

  

1,290,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Performance share award (5)

  

N/A

  

508,499

  

0

  

508,499

 Stock options/SSARs (6)

  

N/A

  

2,125,535

  

0

  

2,125,535

 Restricted Stock Units (7)

  

N/A

  

390,154

  

0

  

390,154

 Retirement plan payments (8)

  

N/A

  

8,359,592

  

923,852

  

8,359,592

 Deferred comp plan (9)

  

N/A

  

2,558,772

  

2,558,772

  

2,558,772

 Health and welfare benefits (10)

  

N/A

  

18,755

  

0

  

0

 Outplacement

  

N/A

  

10,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Total:

  

N/A

  

15,261,307

  

3,482,624

  

13,942,552

Retirement (for awards made in 2021 onwards). Under the 2012 and 2021 LTIP, an NEO eligible for normal or early retirement will be entitled to continued vesting of SSARs and restricted stock unit awards for 36 months in the case of early retirement and 60 months in the case of normal retirement at or after age 62. In the case of normal retirement, the outstanding performance share awards for the performance period ending the soonest will continue to vest, subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance targets. In the case of early retirement, outstanding performance share awards are payable, subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance targets, only at the Compensation Committee’s discretion.

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 70

Early retirement under the 2012 and 2021 LTIP is defined as any reason other than normal retirement, death, disability or cause, under the following circumstance: The executive has at least 10 years of service with a Dover company, is at least 55 years old, and complies with certain notice requirements.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLESAny person who takes early or normal retirement under the 2012 or 2021 LTIP is deemed to have expressly agreed that he or she will not compete with us or any of our companies at which he or she was employed within the three years immediately prior to his or her termination, in the geographic areas in which we or that company actively carried on business at the end of the participant’s employment, for the period during which such retirement affords him or her enhanced benefits (36 months in the case of early retirement or 60 months in the case of normal retirement). If the participant fails to comply with the non-compete provision, he or she forfeits any enhanced benefits under the 2012 and 2021 LTIP and must return to Dover the economic value previously realized by reason of such benefits.

Change in Control (without termination of employment). All the change in control provisions in Dover’s compensation plans are double-trigger. Accordingly, an NEO’s compensation generally will not be affected by a change in control without termination of his or her employment. An executive will be entitled to incremental payments or values upon a change in control without termination of employment only if an executive’s outstanding awards under the 2012 or 2021 LTIP are impaired. In that circumstance, all unvested SSARs and restricted stock units will immediately vest on the date of the change in control and

    

Voluntary

Termination

($)(1)

  

Involuntary Not for

Cause Termination

($)(2)

  

For Cause

Termination

($)(3)

  

Early Retirement
under
Rule of 65 or 70

($)

 Ivonne M. Cabrera

            

 Cash severance (4)

  

N/A

  

1,040,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Performance share award (5)

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Stock options/SSARs (6)

  

2,143,095

  

2,143,095

  

0

  

N/A

 Restricted Stock Units

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Retirement plan payments (8)

  

1,461,455

  

1,461,455

  

379,192

  

N/A

 Deferred comp plan (9)

  

110,562

  

110,562

  

110,562

  

N/A

 Health and welfare benefits (10)

  

0

  

23,732

  

0

  

N/A

 Outplacement

  

N/A

  

10,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Total:

  

3,715,112

  

4,788,844

  

489,754

  

N/A

 Jay L. Kloosterboer

            

 Cash severance (4)

  

N/A

  

1,040,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Performance share award (5)

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Stock options/SSARs (6)

  

901,171

  

901,171

  

0

  

N/A

 Restricted Stock Units (7)

  

0

  

0

  

0

  

N/A

 Retirement plan payments (8)

  

1,037,293

  

1,037,293

  

330,603

  

N/A

 Deferred comp plan (9)

  

60,129

  

60,129

  

60,129

  

N/A

 Health and welfare benefits (10)

  

0

  

19,919

  

0

  

N/A

 Outplacement

  

N/A

  

10,000

  

N/A

  

N/A

 Total:

  

1,998,593

  

3,068,512

  

390,732

  

N/A

(1)

Mr. Spurgeon is eligible for retirement under the 2005 Plan and early retirement under the LTIP. Accordingly, we have assumed that he would take early retirement rather than voluntary termination.

(2)

Dover anticipates allowing anyone eligible for early retirement under the Rule of 65 or the Rule of 70 to take early retirement in the event of involuntary termination for awards under the LTIP. Accordingly, for Mr. Spurgeon, this column reflects the applicable early retirement treatment of his performance shares, RSUs, and SSARs.

(3)

A NEO whose employment is terminated by us for cause will forfeit all outstanding cash and equity awards, whether or not vested or exercisable. The executive will receive a payment of amounts deferred and accrued in the deferred compensation plan and will receive pension plan payments, but will forfeit benefits under the PRP in accordance with the PRP terms.

(4)

Represents 12 month salary continuation plus an amount equal to the pro rata portion of the annual bonus paid for the prior year, subject to the Compensation Committee’s discretion to reduce the payment amount, or in the case of Mr. Tobin the amount is equal to 1.5 times his annual salary plus the target bonus.

(5)

Represents payout of the performance share award for the performance period 2016-2018 at the actual performance level through December 31, 2018. Per his employment agreement, Mr. Tobin’s sign on performance shares for 2018-2020 will fully vest subject to performance. Since Mr. Spurgeon is eligible for early retirement under the Rule of 65, the performance share awards for the three-year performance period 2017-2019 are also included at target. This calculation assumes that the Compensation Committee approves payout for the performance periods for the NEOs.

(6)

Reflects the value of vested SSARs as of December 31, 2018, which is the difference between the closing price of $70.95 per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018, and the exercise price of each option and SSAR award multiplied by the number of shares covered by such award. Also includes, for the NEOs eligible for

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 71


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

early retirement, the value calculated in the same manner for the unvested SSARs that would vest within 36 months under the Rule of 70, or 24 months under the Rule of 65, following the executive’s retirement.
(7)

Mr. Spurgeon is eligible for early retirement under the Rule of 65, the amount reflects the value of unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2018 that will vest within the following 24 months. Mr. Tobin is eligible per his employment agreement to fully vest all sign on RSUs, and the amount shown represents the four remaining tranches that vest after 2018.

(8)

Reflects benefits accrued under the PRP and pension plan as of December 31, 2018.

(9)

These amounts reflect compensation deferred by the executive and earnings accrued thereon under the deferred compensation plan as of December 31, 2018; no increase in such benefits would result from the termination event.

(10)

Under the severance plan, an executive is entitled to a monthly amount equal to the then cost of COBRA health continuation coverage based on the level of health care coverage in effect on the termination date, if any, for the lesser of 12 months or the period that the executive receives COBRA benefits. Mr. Tobin would receive 18 months per his employment agreement.

Potential Payments in Connection with aChange-in-Control (Without Termination)

As discussed below, the payment of severance benefits following achange-in-control is subject to a double-trigger —that is, such benefits are payable only upon certain specified termination events following achange-in-control. However, rights of an executive under the 2005 Plan, the LTIP, the deferred compensation plan, the pension plan, the PRP and other incentive and benefit plans are governed by the terms of those plans and typically are effected by thechange-in-control event itself, even if the executive continues to be employed by us or a successor company following thechange-in-control.

All equity awards outstanding as of December 31, 2018 were granted under the 2005 Plan or the LTIP. Under the 2005 Plan, upon achange-in-control, all outstanding options and SSARs will immediately become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the appropriate stock option or SSAR agreement. All outstanding performance share awards will immediately vest and become immediately due and payable. The performance periods of all outstanding performance share awards terminatepayable on the last daydate of the month priorchange in control on a pro-rata basis for a shortened performance period.

Each person granted an award under the 2012 or 2021 LTIP is deemed to agree that, upon a tender or exchange offer, proxy solicitation or other action seeking to effect a change in control of Dover, he or she will not voluntarily terminate employment with us or any of our companies and, unless terminated by us, will continue to render services to us until the person seeking to effect a change in control of our Company has abandoned, terminated or succeeded in such person’s efforts to effect the change in control.

Under the PRP, upon a change in control, each participant will become entitled to receive the actuarial value of the participant’s benefit accrued through the date of the change in control. No additional incremental amounts are payable under the PRP upon a change in control.

Termination following a change in control. Upon the double-trigger events of a termination of employment following a change in control, an NEO may be eligible for certain cash severance payments and accelerated vesting of equity awards as described below.

An NEO will be entitled to receive severance payments if, within 24 months after the change in control, either his or her employment is terminated by Dover without “cause” or the executive terminates employment for “good reason,” under and as such terms are defined in the CIC Severance Plan. The severance payments will consist of the following:

A lump sum payment equal to 2.0 multiplied by the sum of (i) the executive’s annual salary on the termination date or the change in control date, whichever is higher, and (ii) his or her target annual incentive bonus for the year in which the termination or the date of the change in control occurs, whichever is higher;

A lump sum payment equal to the monthpro rata portion (based on the completed days worked in the year in which thechange-in-control occurs. The participant is entitled date of termination occurs divided by the number of days in such year) of the NEO’s target annual incentive bonus;

12 months of outplacement services up to a maximum of $25,000, as adjusted upwards for inflation; and

A lump sum payment equal to the then cost of COBRA health continuation coverage, based on the level of health care coverage in effect on the termination date, if any, for 24 months.

No executive may receive severance benefits under more than one plan or arrangement. If Dover determines that (i) any payment or distribution to an executive in connection with change in control, whether under the CIC Severance Plan or otherwise, would be subject to excise tax as an excess parachute payment under the Internal Revenue Code and (ii) the executive would receive a greater net-after-tax amount by reducing the amount of which is determined in accordance with the plan andseverance payment, Dover will reduce the relevant performance share award agreement, which is then prorated based onseverance payments made under the portion of the performance period that the participant completed priorCIC Severance Plan to the maximum amount that might be paid (but not less than zero) without the executive becoming subject to the excise tax. The CIC Severance Plan does not provide any change-in-control.gross-up for excise taxes.

Under the LTIP, uponIn addition, if, within 24 months following a change in control of Dover (as defined in the 2012 or 2021 LTIP) and if, within 18 months following the date of the change in control, the participantexecutive is either involuntarily terminated other than for cause, death or disability such that the participant is no longer employed by a Dover company or an event or condition that constitutes “good reason” under the LTIP occurs, and the participantexecutive subsequently resigns for good reason within applicable time limits and other applicable requirements under the 2012 or 2021 LTIP:

 

All optionsunvested SSARs and SSARsRSUs immediately vest upon the date of termination and become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement; and

 

All performance share awards will be deemed to have been earned “at target” as if the performance target had been achieved and such awards will immediately vest and become immediately due and payable on the date of termination; and

All outstanding restrictions, including any performance targets, on restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards will immediately vest or expire on the date of termination and be deemed to have been satisfied or earned “at target” as if the performance targets, if any, have been achieved, and the award will become immediately due and payable on the date of termination.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 72


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

InPotential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table. The table below shows the eventincremental amounts payable to each NEO if his or her employment had terminated in certain circumstances on December 31, 2021. The amounts shown assume that termination was effective as of a change in control in which a participant’s outstanding awards are impaired in value or rights asDecember 31, 2021. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined solely in the discretion of Dover’s “continuing directors” (as defined in the plan), are not assumed by a successor corporation or an affiliate thereof, or are not replaced with an award or grant that, solely in the discretion of the Dover’s continuing directors, will preserve the existing value of the outstanding awards at the time of the change in control:each executive’s separation from Dover.

 

All outstanding options and SSARs will immediately vest on the date of the change in control and become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement;

All outstanding performance share awards will immediately vest and become due and payable on the date of the change in control as follows: the performance period of each such award will terminate on the last day of the month prior to the month in which the change in control occurs and the participant will be entitled to a cash or stock payment, the amount of which will be determined in accordance with the LTIP and the applicable award agreement prorated based on the number of months in the performance period which have passed prior to the change in control as compared to the total number of months in the original performance period; and

All outstanding restrictions, including any performance targets with respect to any options, SSARs, restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards will immediately vest or expire on the date of the change in control and be deemed to have been satisfied or earned at “target” as if the performance targets, if any, have been achieved and such awards will become immediately due and payable on the date of the change in control.

Each person granted an award under the 2005 Plan or LTIP is deemed to agree that, upon a tender or exchange offer, proxy solicitation or other action seeking to effect achange-in-control of Dover, he or she will not voluntarily terminate employment with us or any of our companies and, unless terminated by us, will continue to render services to us until the person seeking to effect achange-in-control of our Company has abandoned, terminated or succeeded in such person’s efforts to effect thechange-in-control.

Under the PRP, upon achange-in-control, each participant will become entitled to receive the actuarial value of the participant’s benefit accrued through the date of thechange-in-control. Under the deferred compensation plan, amounts deferred under the plan will continue to accrue any earnings and will be payable in accordance with the elections made by the executive officer.

The following table shows the aggregate potential equity values and potential payments under plans to which each of the continuing NEOs would have been entitled upon achange-in-control on December 31, 2018.

  Named Executive Officer 

Stock

Options/
SSARs ($)(1)

  

Restricted

Stock

Awards ($)

  

Performance

Share Awards

($)

  

PRP and

Pension Plan

($)

  

Deferred

Compensation

Plan ($)

 

 Richard J. Tobin

  0   0   0   N/A   158,569 

 Brad M. Cerepak

  2,219,842   0   0   1,389,951   0 

 William W. Spurgeon, Jr.

  0   0   158,289   7,435,740   2,558,772 

 Ivonne M. Cabrera

  1,316,593   0   0   1,082,263   110,562 

 Jay L. Kloosterboer

  0   0   0   706,690   60,129 

(1)

Reflects value of vested and unvested options and SSARs granted under the 2005 Plan and the LTIP; table assumes no acceleration of vesting of such awards upon a change of control per the Plan provisions described above.

Name  Voluntary
Termination
($) (1)
   Involuntary Not for
Cause Termination
($) (2)
   For Cause
Termination
($) (3)
   Normal
Retirement or
Early Retirement
under
Rule 65 or 70
($)
     Involuntary or
Good Reason
Termination
following a
Change-in-Control
($)
 

Richard J. Tobin

                           
Cash severance   N/A    4,631,250 (5)    N/A    N/A      6,175,000 (6) 
Performance share award   0    0    0    N/A      9,879,222 (8) 
Stock options/SSARs   0    0    0    N/A      31,226,926 (9) 
Restricted Stock Units   0    5,978,817 (10)    0    N/A      11,039,827 (11) 
Health and welfare benefits   0    40,613 (12)    0    N/A      54,150 (12) 
Outplacement   N/A    25,000    N/A    N/A      25,000 

Total:

   0    10,675,679    0    N/A      58,400,125 

Brad M. Cerepak

                           
Cash severance   N/A    1,462,000 (5)    N/A    N/A      2,924,000 (6) 
Performance share award   N/A    1,211,998 (7)    0    1,211,998 (7)      2,469,760 (8) 
Stock options/SSARs   N/A    8,401,466 (4)    0    8,401,466 (4)      8,401,466 (9) 
Restricted Stock Units   N/A    1,298,440 (10)    0    1,298,440 (10)      1,298,440 (11) 
Health and welfare benefits   N/A    27,075 (12)    0    0      54,150 (12) 
Outplacement   N/A    25,000    N/A    N/A      25,000 

Total:

   N/A    12,425,979    0    10,911,904      15,172,815 

Girish Juneja

                           
Cash severance   N/A    850,000 (5)    N/A    N/A      1,700,000 (6) 
Performance share award   0    0    0    N/A      599,098 (8) 
Stock options/SSARs   0    0    0    N/A      1,954,776 (9) 
Restricted Stock Units   0    0    0    N/A      308,720 (11) 
Health and welfare benefits   0    13,047 (12)    0    N/A      26,094 (12) 
Outplacement   N/A    25,000    N/A    N/A      25,000 

Total:

   0    888,047    0    N/A      4,613,689 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 73


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

Potential Payments upon Termination Following aChange-in-Control

Under the CIC severance plan, an NEO covered by the plan will be entitled to receive severance payments if, within 18 months after thechange-in-control, either his or her employment is terminated by Dover without “cause” or the executive terminates employment for “good reason,” as such terms are defined in the plan. The severance payments will consist of the following:

A lump sum payment equal to 2.0 multiplied by the sum of (i) the executive’s annual salary on the termination date or thechange-in-control date, whichever is higher, and (ii) his or her target annual incentive bonus for the year in which the termination or the date of thechange-in-control occurs, whichever is higher; and

A lump sum payment equal to the then cost of COBRA health continuation coverage, based on the level of health care coverage in effect on the termination date, if any, for one year.

No executive may receive severance benefits under more than one plan or arrangement. If Dover determines that (i) any payment or distribution to an executive in connection withchange-in-control, whether under the CIC severance plan or otherwise, would be subject to excise tax as an excess parachute payment under the Internal Revenue Code and (ii) the executive would receive a greaternet-after-tax amount by reducing the amount of the severance payment, Dover will reduce the severance payments made under the CIC severance plan to the maximum amount that might be paid (but not less than zero) without the executive becoming subject to the excise tax. The CIC severance plan does not provide anygross-up for excise taxes.

The following table shows the potential payments and other benefits that each of the NEOs would have been entitled to receive upon involuntary or good reason termination following achange-in-control on December 31, 2018.

  Named Executive

  Officer

 

Lump Sum

Amount
($)

  

Health and

Welfare

Benefits

($)

  

Outplace-

ment

($)

  

Stock

Options/

SSARs

($)(1)

  

Restricted

Stock

Units

($)(2)

  

Perfor-

mance

Share

Awards

($)(3)

  

280G Tax

Gross-Up

/Cutback

Amount

($)(4)

  

Total

($)(5)

 

 Richard J. Tobin

 

 

5,400,000

 

 

35,598

(6) 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

10,600,569

 

 

6,647,802

 

 

0

 

 

 

22,693,969

 

 Brad M. Cerepak

 

 

2,820,000

 

 

 

23,732

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

4,766,160

 

 

 

810,036

 

 

 

770,233

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

9,200,162

 

 William W. Spurgeon Jr.

 

 

2,600,000

 

 

 

18,755

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

2,125,535

 

 

 

453,583

 

 

 

635,428

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,001,591

 

 Ivonne M. Cabrera

 

 

1,836,000

 

 

 

23,732

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

1,845,962

 

 

 

329,918

 

 

 

308,065

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

4,353,676

 

 Jay L. Kloosterboer

 

 

1,836,000

 

 

 

19,919

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

1,920,631

 

 

 

329,918

 

 

 

308,065

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

4,424,532

 

Name  Voluntary
Termination
($)(1)
   Involuntary Not for
Cause Termination
($)(2)
   For Cause
Termination
($)(3)
   Normal
Retirement or
Early Retirement
under
Rule 65 or 70
($)
   Involuntary or
Good Reason
Termination
following a
Change-in-Control
($)
 

Ivonne M. Cabrera

                         
Cash severance   N/A    952,000 (5)      N/A    N/A          1,904,000 (6)   
Performance share award   N/A    484,872 (7)      0    484,872 (7)      958,303 (8)   
Stock options/SSARs   N/A    3,317,984 (4)      0    3,317,984 (4)      3,317,984 (9)   
Restricted Stock Units   N/A    504,666 (10)    0    504,666 (10)    504,666 (11) 
Health and welfare benefits   N/A    27,075 (12)    0    0           54,150 (12) 
Outplacement   N/A    25,000           N/A    N/A          25,000        

Total:

     5,311,597           0    4,307,522           6,764,103        

Kimberly K. Bors

                         
Cash severance   N/A    765,000 (5)      N/A    N/A          1,530,000 (6)   
Performance share award   0    0           0    N/A          616,714 (8)   
Stock options/SSARs   0    0           0    N/A          909,809 (9)   
Restricted Stock Units   0    0           0    N/A          257,872 (11) 
Health and welfare benefits   0    13,934 (12)    0    N/A          27,868 (12) 
Outplacement   N/A    25,000           N/A    N/A          25,000        

Total

   0    803,934           0    N/A          3,367,263        

 

(1)

Represents acceleration of vesting of SSAR awards grantedMr. Cerepak is eligible for early retirement for grants awarded through 2020 and normal retirement for grants awarded 2021 onwards, and Ms. Cabrera is eligible for early retirement for grants under the 2012 and 2021 LTIP. Accordingly, we have assumed that Mr. Cerepak would take early retirement for his grants awarded through 2020 and normal retirement for his grants awarded 2021 onwards, and Ms. Cabrera would take early retirement, rather than voluntary termination.

(2)

Represents RSUs grantedDover anticipates allowing anyone eligible for normal retirement or early retirement under the LTIP.Rule of 65 or the Rule of 70 under the 2012 and 2021 LTIP to take normal or early retirement in the event of involuntary termination. Accordingly, for Mr. Cerepak, this column reflects the applicable early retirement treatment of his performance shares, RSUs, and SSARs, for grants awarded through 2020 and normal retirement treatment for grants awarded 2021 onwards, and for Ms. Cabrera, this column reflects the applicable early retirement treatment of her performance shares, RSUs, and SSARs that would vest within 24 months for grants awarded through 2020 and early retirement treatment of her performance shares, RSUs and SSARs that would vest within 36 months for grants awarded 2021 onwards.

(3)

A NEO whose employment is terminated by us for cause will forfeit all outstanding cash and equity awards, whether or not vested or exercisable. The executive will also forfeit benefits under the PRP in accordance with the PRP terms.

(4)

Reflects for Mr. Cerepak the value of unvested SSARs that would vest within 24 months for SSARs granted in 2019 and 2020, and within 60 months for SSARs granted in 2021; for Ms. Cabrera, the value of unvested SSARs that would vest within 24 months for SSARs granted in 2019 and 2020 and within 36 months for SSARs granted in 2021.

(5)

For Mr. Tobin, the amount is equal to 1.5 times the sum of his annual salary plus target bonus; for the other NEOs, the amounts represent 12 month salary continuation and an annual incentive bonus at target.

(6)

Represents a payment equal to 2 times the sum of (i) the executive’s annual salary on the termination date or the change in control date, whichever is higher, and (ii) his or her target annual incentive bonus for the year in which the termination or the date of the change in control occurs, whichever is higher,

(7)

Represents payout at target of performance share awards granted under the 2012 LTIP for the 2017-20192020-2022 performance period, using $181.60 per share, market closing price on December 31, 2021. This calculation assumes that the Compensation Committee approves payout for the performance period for Mr. Cerepak and 2018-2020 performance periods.Ms. Cabrera.

(4)(8)

The cutback amount shown in this column reflects the applicationRepresents payout at target of the “best net” provisionsperformance share awards granted under the CIC severance plan as described above.

(5)

For additional potential amounts payable upon achange-in-control under Dover’s employee benefit plans without termination of employment, see table2012 LTIP for the 2020-2022 and 2021-2023 performance periods, using $181.60 per share, market closing price on previous page.

(6)

Per Mr. Tobin’s employment agreement, he is entitled to 18 months of Health and Welfare Benefits.December 31, 2021.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 74


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

(9)

Represents acceleration of vesting of unvested SSAR awards granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated as the difference between the closing price of $181.60 per share of our common stock on December 31, 2021, and the exercise price of each unvested SSAR award multiplied by the number of shares covered by such award.

(10)

For Mr. Cerepak the amount reflects the value of unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2021 that will vest within the following 24 months for RSUs granted in 2019 and 2020 and 60 months for RSUs granted in 2021. For Ms. Cabrera the amount reflects the value of unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2021 that will vest within the following 24 months for RSUs granted in 2019 and 2020 and 36 months for RSUs granted in 2021. Mr. Tobin is eligible per his employment agreement to fully vest all sign-on RSUs, and the amount shown represents the one remaining tranche that vests in 2022.

(11)

Represents acceleration of vesting of unvested RSUs granted under the 2012 LTIP.

(12)

Represents COBRA health continuation coverage costs under the severance plan or CIC Severance Plan as applicable. Under the Severance Plan, an executive is entitled to a lump sum payment equal to the then cost of COBRA health continuation coverage for 12 months. Mr. Tobin would receive 18 months COBRA per his employment agreement; under the CIC Severance Plan, the COBRA lump sum payments for Mr. Tobin and all the NEOs would receive 24 months.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 75


Proposal 3 — Advisory Resolution to Approve

Named Executive Officer Compensation

Each year, we offer our shareholders an opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory and nonbinding basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act.

We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our NEO compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a“say-on-pay” “Say on Pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our NEOs’ compensation. We believe that Dover’sour compensation programs are well designed and reinforce our strategic focus on continued revenue and profit growth. Over

Our Board has a strong history of engaging with shareholders and soliciting feedback on a range of topics, including our executive compensation program. Historically, our program has received strong shareholder support as expressed during our one-on-one engagement discussions with shareholders and through our Say on Pay vote levels. At our 2021 annual meeting, approximately 93% of the past few years, Dover has enacted many changes to its programs that are outlined invoting shareholders approved the Compensation Discussion and Analysis sectioncompensation of this Proxy Statement. We believe these changes have further strengthened the linkage betweenNEOs. At our compensation programs and the creation of shareholder value. At the 2018 Annual Meeting,2020 annual meeting, over approximately 96% of the voting shareholders approved the compensation of the NEOs. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider feedback from shareholders, as well as the results from future shareholder advisory votes, in its ongoing evaluation of executive compensation programs and practices at Dover.

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that Dover’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in Dover’s Proxy Statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures.”

Thesay-on-pay Say on Pay vote is advisory and therefore not binding on Dover, our Compensation Committee or our Board. Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF

OUR NEOs, AS

DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENTSTATEMENT.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 7576


Management ProposalsShareholder Proposal

Background of ProposalsProposaland 5— Shareholder Proposal Regarding the Right to Act by Written Consent

Subject MatterJohn Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, beneficial owner of Vote

Ourno fewer than 50 shares of Dover’s common stock, has given notice that he intends to present a proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with SEC rules, John Chevedden’s proposed resolution and supporting statement are printed verbatim below. The Board accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the proposal and the Governancesupporting statement.

Proposal 4 — Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent

Shareholders request that our board of directors take the necessary steps to permit written consent by the shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize an action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and Nominating Committee believevoting. This includes that adherenceone shareholder shall be able to soundperform the ministerial function of asking for a record date.

This proposal is on the ballot because management used misleading statements to resist this proposal in 2021. Thus the 2021 shareholder vote on this proposal topic was tainted by Dover management’s use of misleading statements.

Dover management claimed that with written consent shareholders would not receive ample advance notice. This is misleading because written consent can be structured so that all shareholders receive ample advance notice.

Dover management also clamed that Dover had a “robust shareholder engagement program.” If the management statement next to the 2021 written consent proposal is typical, then the so called “robust shareholder engagement” is based on Dover management attempting to mislead shareholders.

Due to management’s attempt to mislead shareholders a whole year was wasted in presenting this proposal topic to shareholders.

When reading the management statement next to the 2022 written consent proposal please remember that there is a formal process to root out any supposedly misleading shareholder text in a shareholder proposal but there is no formal process to root out misleading management text next to a shareholder proposal.

This proposal topic won impressive 85%-support at the 2021 Conagra annual meeting without any special effort by the shareholder proponent.

A reasonable shareholder right to act by written consent can make shareholder engagement meaningful. If management is insincere in its shareholder engagement, a right for shareholders to act by written consent in our bylaws can make management think twice about insincerity.

A shareholder right to act by written consent in our bylaws will help ensure that management engages with shareholders in good faith because shareholders will have a viable Plan B through acting by written consent. Our bylaws give no assurance that shareholder engagement will continue.

Please vote yes:

Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent — Proposal 4

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 77


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

Opposition Statement of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “AGAINST” THE PROPOSAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

The Board is committed to strong corporate governance and responsiveness to Dover’s shareholders and believes in maintaining policies and practices informed by evolvingthat serve the best practices and shareholder feedbackinterests of all shareholders. After careful consideration, the Board has determined that the proposal is important, and they are committed to ensuring that Dover is governed and managed with the highest standards of responsibility andnot in the best interests of Dover and its shareholders.

To The Board believes that end, our Board and Governance and Nominating Committee have carefully considereda written consent right is unnecessary given the advantages and disadvantages of Dover’s current super-majority voting provisions and, after careful consideration and upon the recommendation by the Governance and Nominating Committee, our Board has adopted, declared advisable and recommends that shareholders approve the amendment and restatementability of our charter to eliminate the super-majority voting provisions contained therein, which are limited to the following matters:

Amendments to the charter relating to certain share repurchases from “interested stockholders” (defined in our charter as a beneficial holder of 5%shareholders holding 15% or more of our outstanding shares unless heldto call special meetings of shareholders.

The proposal would deprive the right of all shareholders to be consulted on important matters concerning their investment in Dover.

Our governing documents require that actions subject to a shareholder vote be considered at a meeting of shareholders. This requirement ensures that all shareholders receive advance notice of the proposed action and have an opportunity to discuss it and consider all points of view. In contrast, the proposal would allow one group of shareholders to approve and adopt critical actions relating to the company without notice to other shareholders and without an opportunity for more than four years)discussion at a shareholder meeting. Action by written consent can occur with little or no advance notice to the Company, other shareholders or the abilitymarket. As a result, the Board may not have a meaningful opportunity to consider the merits of the proposed action, to consider alternative courses of action or to communicate its views to shareholders. Therefore, this proposal, if adopted, could disenfranchise shareholders and may deprive them of their rights, while enabling other short-term or special interest investors to approve proposals that are not in the best interest of all shareholders. Because of these deficiencies, the Board believes that the written consent process is not appropriate for a widely held public company like Dover.

We have a robust shareholder engagement program and our shareholders have indicated that a 15% special meeting right is preferable to a written consent right.

In 2021, we continued our focus on regularly engaging with our shareholders. We reached out to holders of approximately 60% of our shares outstanding, and engaged with governance professionals and/or portfolio managers at investors holding approximately 31% of our shares outstanding. As described under “Shareholder Engagement and History of Board Responsiveness” on pages 31 through 32, engagement topics included diversity and inclusion, ESG, compensation, and governance matters. Although shareholders possess a variety of views, many of our shareholders expressed that the right to act by written consent was unnecessary in light of our shareholders’ right to call special meetings. Moreover, to the extent some shareholders desired greater rights, the overall feedback was that the adoption in 2020 of a 15% ownership threshold for special meetings was preferable to a written consent right.

Our shareholder right to call special meetings allows shareholders to use cumulative voting in the election of directors once therepropose actions without waiting for our next annual meeting. A special meeting right set at an appropriate threshold is a “substantial stockholder” (defined in our charter as a beneficial holder of 40% or more of our shares) (Proposal 4); and

Amendmentspreferable to the charter provision that prohibits action by written consent because a meeting allows all shareholders to participate in, and discuss the merits of, shareholders (Proposal 5).

Under Dover’s existing governing documents, a majority vote requirement appliesproposed action, and allows the Board to all other matters submittedmake a thoughtful recommendation about the action. As a result, a strong shareholder special meeting right is better suited to a vote (other thanculture of transparency and good corporate governance.

The Board believes that having a special meeting right at a 15% ownership threshold strikes the useright balance for Dover, as it is a low enough threshold to provide a meaningful right for shareholders to act between annual meetings yet high enough to prevent a single shareholder (or small group of plurality votingshareholders) from acting without broad shareholder support.

Our shareholders voted against substantially similar shareholder proposals at our 2021 and 2020 annual meetings.

The same shareholder proponent submitted at each of our last two annual meetings a substantially similar shareholder proposal regarding the right to act by written consent. Consistent with the views expressed by many shareholders in the eventcourse of a contested election). There are no super-majority provisions in ourby-laws and the only super-majority provisions in our charter are described above and subject to Proposals 4 and 5.

Board Analysis

These super-majority voting provisions have been part of our charter for many years and were originally designed to ensure that the interests of all shareholders were adequately represented in the event any of the actions contemplated by these provisions were to occur. On the other hand, the Board is aware that some shareholders oppose super-majority provisions, arguing that super-majority voting provisions may limit the ability of holders ofshareholder engagement, a majority of shareholders have rejected these proposals at each of the 2020 and 2021 annual meetings, with each proposal receiving support from only 32 to 33 percent of the votes cast at each of the meetings.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 78


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

We have a strong corporate governance structure and a record of responsiveness and accountability.

Our corporate governance structure reflects a significant and ongoing commitment to strong and effective corporate governance and accountability and responsiveness to shareholders. Our Board regularly assesses and refines our common stockgovernance policies and procedures to effect changes they desire.

The Board also tooktake into account that:

We have takenproactive stepsevolving best practices and to remove super-majority provisions fromaddress feedback provided by our shareholders during our engagement with them. In addition to our 15% special meeting right, other corporate governance materials.practices that reflect our accountability and responsiveness to shareholders include:

 

 

At our2013Annual Election of Directors Annual Meeting, anon-binding shareholder proposal requesting us to take all steps necessary, in compliance with applicable law, to remove super-majority voting requirements from our governance materials received the support of the holders of approximately 62%– All of our outstanding common stock.directors are elected on an annual basis.

 

 

AtMajority Voting Standard in Director Elections – Directors must receive a majority vote to be elected in an uncontested election, and a director who fails to receive a majority vote must tender his or her resignation under our2014 Annual Meeting, a management proposal to amend our charterto eliminate the super-majority provision applicable to business combinations with a related person wassuccessful.A management proposal to amend our bylawsto permit shareholders owning at least 25% of our outstanding shares to call special meeting also wassuccessful. director resignation policy.

 

 

AlsoProxy Access – Under our by-laws, a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at our2014 Annual Meeting,two other management proposals to eliminate the remaining super-majority provisions (in Article 15 and Article 16 of our charter) were supported by holders of just over 76%least three percent of our outstanding common stock. The levelshares for at least three years may nominate and include in our proxy materials up to the greater of support was below the required affirmative votetwo director candidates or 20% of the holders of at least 80% of our common stock andthe proposalsdid not pass.Board.

 

 

AtIndependent Board of Directors – All directors are independent, other than our2017 CEO, and 2018Annual Meetings,informedour Board has leadership that is independent from management, by active shareholder engagement,we presented the same management proposals to eliminate the only remaining super-majority provisions in our

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 76


MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS

charter. In both 2017 and 2018, the proposals were supported by holdersway of just over 79% of our outstanding common stock. The level of support was below the required affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of our outstanding common stock andthe proposalsdid not pass.

Following our 2018 Annual Meeting,we sought further shareholder input as our Board considered next steps with respect to the removal of the remaining super-majority provisions in our charter.

Shareholders expressed appreciation for our continued efforts to remove the provisions and acknowledged our continued responsiveness to shareholder feedback while facing the high hurdle presented by the current 80% voting requirement in our charter to approve amendments to remove the super-majority provisions.an independent Chair.

 

 

Given our proactiveBoard Refreshment – Our Board, through its Governance and continued effortsNominating Committee, maintains a thoughtful and active refreshment process to removeidentify independent directors with skill sets that enhance the remaining super-majority provisions over the past several years, many investors would have been supportive ifcomposition of our Board, did not present a management proposal to eliminatesupport our growth and strategy, and enable effective oversight. Our Board has added three new independent directors since 2017.

Elimination of Supermajority Voting Provisions – All of the supermajority voting provisions in our charter were eliminated in 2019.

 

 

However, severalShareholder Engagement – Shareholders can communicate directly with the Board and/or individual directors. In addition, we regularly engage with our shareholders continuedregarding strategy, governance, compensation and sustainability matters. In 2021, we reached out to express a preference for simple majority voting requirements and encouraged us to put forth another management proposal to remove the remaining super-majority voting provisions in our charter.

Our Board iscommitted to evolving our governance practices to ensure we continue to operate with abest-in-class governance structure. Recent changes that show this commitment include:

Our 2016 adoptionholders of proxy access, which permits a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders holding 3% or moreapproximately 60% of our stock continuously for three years to nominate up to 20% of our Board or two directors, whichever is greater.shares outstanding.

 

 

Ourenhanced shareholder engagement program, through which we reached out to holders of over 51% of our outstanding shares in 2018 and engaged with governance professionals and portfolio managers holding 32% of our outstanding shares.No Shareholder Rights Plan – We do not have a shareholders rights plan.

Our 2014In light of our existing right of shareholders to call special meetings with a 15% ownership threshold, as well as the Board’s continuing commitment to effective corporate governance, the Board believes that adoption of a bylaw permittingshareholders owning at least 25% of our outstanding shares to call special meetings.

Therefore, after careful consideration of the foregoing matters, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Governanceshareholder proposal is unnecessary and Nominating Committee, has determined that it is appropriate to propose the amendment and restatement of the charter to eliminate the super-majority voting provisions and that doing so isnot in the best interests of Dover and its shareholders.

You are being provided with an opportunity to vote separately on the removal of each of the super-majority voting provisions currently contained in our charter as described below under Proposals 4 and 5. In accordance with Delaware law, the Board has adopted resolutions approving and declaring advisable the amendment and restatement of our charter and is recommending the removal of both of the super-majority voting provisions to shareholders for approval. Under our charter and Delaware law, approval of each of Proposal 4 and 5 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of our outstanding common stock.

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 77


Proposal 4 — Approval of Amendments to Article 15 of Our Charter to Eliminate Super- Majority Voting Requirement

Subject Matter of Vote

Article FIFTEENTH of our charter (“Article 15”) requires that, subject to certain exceptions, any purchases by Dover or its subsidiaries of “voting shares” (defined in our charter as the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors) held by an “interested stockholder” (defined in our charter, among other things, as a beneficial owner of 5% or more of our voting shares that has been such a beneficial owner for less than four years) at a per share price in excess of the applicable market price must be approved by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of all outstanding voting shares not beneficially owned by the “interested stockholder.” In addition, Article 15 provides shareholders with cumulative voting rights in the election of directors if at the time of such election there exists a “substantial stockholder” (defined in our charter as a beneficial owner of 40% or more of our voting shares). As of December 31, 2017, we are not aware of any beneficial owner that holds more than 12% of our outstanding voting shares.

Subsection (E) of Article 15 currently provides that amendments, alterations, changes or repeals (“Changes”) to or of Article 15 must be approved, subject to certain exceptions, by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of our outstanding voting shares (the “Article 15 Amendment Provision”).

On the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, and based on the careful review of the advantages and disadvantages of the Article 15 Amendment Provision as described in the “Background of Proposals 4 and 5” above, the Board has approved, and recommends that shareholders approve, this Proposal 4 to eliminate the Article 15 Amendment Provision in its entirety.

If this Proposal 4 is approved by shareholders, future Changes to Article 15 may be effected in accordance with Delaware law and will not be subject to a super-majority voting requirement. If this Proposal 4 is adopted, under Delaware law, future Changes to Article 15 would need to be approved by the Board and by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the capital stock of Dover outstanding and entitled to vote on the amendment.

The approval of this Proposal 4 is not conditioned on the approval of any other Proposal.

This summary of the proposed amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the proposed elimination of the Article 15 Amendment Provision attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement, with deletions indicated by strike outs and additions indicated by underlining.

Required Vote

In accordance with Delaware law, our Board has approved and declared advisable the amendment and restatement of our charter, including the elimination of the Article 15 Amendment Provision, and is recommending it to shareholders for approval. Under our charter and Delaware law, approval of Proposal 4 will require the affirmative vote of holders at least 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock. If Proposal 4 is approved, our shareholders will be deemed to have approved an amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Dover incorporating the elimination of the Article 15 Amendment Provision set forth in Appendix A.

Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have the effect of votes against the proposal. If this Proposal 4 is approved by shareholders, the Board has authorized the officers of Dover to file with the Delaware Secretary of State an amended and restated certificate of incorporation incorporating the elimination of the Article 15 Amendment Provision as set forth in Appendix A. The amendment and restatement of our charter will become effective on the date the amended and restated certificate of incorporation is filed with the Delaware Secretary of State (or at such later effective date set forth therein). If Proposal 4 is not approved by the requisite vote, the proposed elimination of the Article 15 Amendment Provision of our charter will not be implemented and Dover’s current voting requirements contained therein will remain in place.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”“AGAINST” THE AMENDMENTSHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

REGARDING THE RIGHT TO ARTICLE 15 OF OUR CHARTER TO ELIMINATE SUPER-MAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT.

 

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 78


Proposal 5 — Approval of Amendments to Article 16 of Our Charter to Eliminate Super- Majority Voting Requirement

Subject Matter of Vote

The first paragraph of Article SIXTEENTH of our charter (“Article 16”) contains a prohibition on shareholder action by written consent. The second paragraph of Article 16 currently provides that Changes to Article 16 must be approved, subject to certain exceptions, by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of our outstanding voting shares (the “Article 16 Amendment Provision”).

On the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, and based on the careful review of the advantages and disadvantages of the Article 16 Amendment Provision as described in the “Background of Proposals 4 and 5” above, the Board has approved, and recommends that shareholders approve, this Proposal 5 to eliminate the Article 16 Amendment Provision in its entirety.

If this Proposal 5 is approved by shareholders, future Changes to Article 16 may be effected in accordance with Delaware law and will not be subject to a super-majority voting requirement. If this Proposal 5 is adopted, under Delaware law, future Changes to Article 16 would need to be approved by the Board and by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the capital stock of Dover outstanding and entitled to vote on the amendment.

The approval of this Proposal 5 is not conditioned on the approval of any other Proposal.

This summary of the proposed amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the proposed elimination of the Article 16 Amendment Provision attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement, with deletions indicated by strike outs and additions indicated by underlining.

Required Vote

In accordance with Delaware law, our Board has approved and declared advisable the amendment and restatement of our charter, including the elimination of the Article 16 Amendment Provision, and is recommending it to shareholders for approval. Under our charter and Delaware law, approval of Proposal 5 will require the affirmative vote of holders of at least 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock. If Proposal 5 is approved, our shareholders will be deemed to have approved an amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Dover incorporating the elimination of the Article 16 Amendment Provision set forth in Appendix B.

Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have the effect of votes against the proposal. If this Proposal 5 is approved by shareholders, the Board has authorized the officers of Dover to file with the Delaware Secretary of State an amended and restated certificate of incorporation incorporating the elimination of the Article 16 Amendment Provision as set forth in Appendix B. The amendment and restatement of our charter will become effective on the date the amended and restated certificate of incorporation is filed with the Delaware Secretary of State (or at such later effective date set forth therein). If Proposal 5 is not approved by the requisite vote, the elimination of the Article 16 Amendment Provision of our charter will not be implemented and Dover’s current voting requirements contained therein will remain in place.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 16 OF OUR CHARTER TO ELIMINATE SUPER-MAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 79


Share Ownership Information

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership, as of March 8, 20199, 2022 (except as otherwise stated), of our common stock by the following:

 

Each director and each of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table”Tables”;

 

All of the directors and executive officers as a group including the NEOs; and

 

Each person known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.

The beneficial ownership set forth in the table is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. The percentage of beneficial ownership for directors and executive officers is based on 145,213,280144,106,147 shares of common stock outstanding on March 8, 2019.9, 2022. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power as to all shares beneficially owned.

 

   
 NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER  Number of
Shares(1)
     Percentage(1) 

 

 DIRECTORS (EXCEPT MR. TOBIN):

      

 

 PETER T. FRANCIS

  

 

23,857

(2) 

    

 

*

 

 

 H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR.

  

 

628

 

    

 

*

 

 

 KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM

  

 

543,235

(3) 

    

 

*

 

 

 MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON

  

 

15,575

(4) 

    

 

*

 

 

 RICHARD K. LOCHRIDGE

  

 

22,734

(5) 

    

 

*

 

 

 ERIC A. SPIEGEL

  

 

2,994

(6) 

    

 

*

 

 

 STEPHEN M. TODD

  

 

18,860

(7) 

    

 

*

 

 

 STEPHEN K. WAGNER

  

 

14,860

(8) 

    

 

*

 

 

 KEITH E. WANDELL

  

 

5,150

 

    

 

*

 

 

 MARY A. WINSTON

  

 

14,563

 

    

 

*

 

 

 NEOS:

      

 

 RICHARD J. TOBIN

  

 

27,411

(9) 

    

 

*

 

 

 ROBERT A. LIVINGSTON

  

 

925,135

(10) 

    

 

*

 

 

 BRAD M. CEREPAK

  

 

477,972

(11) 

    

 

*

 

 

 WILLIAM W. SPURGEON, JR.

  

 

100,857

(12) 

    

 

*

 

 

 IVONNE M. CABRERA

  

 

161,242

(13) 

    

 

*

 

 

 JAY L. KLOOSTERBOER

  

 

91,579

(14) 

    

 

*

 

 

 DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP
(20 PERSONS)

   2,536,217(15)      1.7

 

 5% BENEFICIAL OWNERS:

      

 

 BLACKROCK, INC.

  

 

11,821,885

(16) 

    

 

8.1

 

 STATE STREET CORPORATION

  

 

8,367,126

(17) 

    

 

5.7

 

 THE VANGUARD GROUP

  

 

17,214,835

(18) 

    

 

11.76

 

 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.

  

 

8,333,335

(19) 

    

 

5.6

   

  NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER

 

  Number of
Shares(1)
   Percentage(1) 

 

  DIRECTORS (EXCEPT MR. TOBIN):

    

 

          DEBORAH L. DEHAAS (2)

   767       * 

 

          H. JOHN GILBERTSON, JR.

   3,873       * 

 

          KRISTIANE C. GRAHAM (3)

   238,355       * 

 

          MICHAEL F. JOHNSTON (4)

   19,596       * 

 

          ERIC A. SPIEGEL (5)

   7,739       * 

 

          STEPHEN M. TODD (6)

   22,105       * 

 

          STEPHEN K. WAGNER (7)

   18,105       * 

 

          KEITH E. WANDELL

   8,263       * 

 

          MARY A. WINSTON

   16,348       * 

 

  NEOS:

    

 

          RICHARD J. TOBIN (8)

   606,259       * 

 

          BRAD M. CEREPAK (9)

   414,362       * 

 

          IVONNE M. CABRERA (10)

   224,532       * 

 

          GIRISH JUNEJA (11)

   29,863       * 

 

          KIMBERLY K. BORS (12)

   3,399       * 

 

  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (18 PERSONS) (13)

   1,670,963    1.2 * 

 

  5% BENEFICIAL OWNERS:

    

 

          BLACKROCK, INC. (14)

   10,713,313    7.4

 

          JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. (15)

   11,268,963    7.8

 

          THE VANGUARD GROUP (16)

   16,671,379    11.6

 

*

Less than one percent.

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 80


SHARE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

(1)

In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by an executive officer and the percentage ownership of such executive officers, we have included (i) shares of common stock subject to stock-settled appreciation rights (“SSARs”) held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 8, 20199, 2022 and (ii) shares of common stock subject to restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 8, 2019,9, 2022, subject to the executive being an employee of Dover on the date of vesting. Such shares, however, are not deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Information about shares held through Dover’s 401(k) plan is as of March 8, 2019;9, 2022; fractional shares held in 401(k) accounts have been rounded down.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 80


SHARE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by anynon-employee directorsa director and the percentage ownership of suchnon-employee directors, director, we have included shares of common stock subject to deferred stock units which will bebecome payable in an equal numberupon the director’s termination of shares of common stock at the time such director departs from the Board.service. Such shares, however, are not deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(2)

Includes 10,882Reflects 767 deferred stock units.

(3)

Includes 159,35932,571 shares held by foundations of which Ms. Graham is a director and in which she disclaims any beneficial ownership, 11,116 shares held in various trusts of which she is aco-trustee sharing voting and investment powers and in which she disclaims any beneficial ownership, 2,460 shares held by her minor children to which Ms. Graham disclaims any beneficial ownership and 10,88214,127 deferred stock units.

(4)

Includes 11,57515,596 deferred stock units.

(5)

Represents 13,360 shares held directly or indirectly by a trust of which Mr. Lochridge is the trustee and 9,374Includes 5,374 deferred stock units.

(6)

Represents 2,994Includes 14,127 deferred stock units.

(7)

Includes 10,88214,127 deferred stock units.

(8)

Includes 10,882 deferred stock units.

(9)

Includes 3,126 deferred stock units, 5,908394,869 shares in respect of vested SSARs, 18,186 shares in respect of restricted stock units scheduled to vest on March 15, 20192022 and 41320 shares held in our 401(k) plan.

(10)(9)

Includes 825,056346,757 shares in respect of vested SSARs, and 17,5094,790 shares in respect of restricted stock units scheduled to vest on March 15, 2019.2022 and 2,712 shares held in our 401(k) plan.

(11)(10)

Includes 419,011198,729 shares in respect of vested SSARs, 6,1732,158 shares in respect of restricted stock units scheduled to vest on March 15, 20192022 and 2,4041,827 shares held in our 401(k) plan.

(12)(11)

Includes 81,18123,537 shares in respect of vested SSARs, 3,5091,621 shares in respect of restricted stock units scheduled to vest on March 15, 20192022 and 8,975381 shares held in our 401(k) plan.

(13)(12)

Includes 148,780 shares in respect of SSARs, 2,552474 shares in respect of restricted stock units scheduled to vest on March 15, 20192022 and 1,655229 shares held in our 401(k) plan.

(14)(13)

Includes 67,3731,003,163 shares in respect of vested SSARs, 2,55267,244 deferred stock units, 28,958 shares in respect of restricted stock units scheduled to vest on March 15, 20192022 and 2,48114,412 shares held in our 401(k) plan.

(15)(14)

Includes 1,618,179 shares in respect of SSARs, 70,597 deferred stock units, 42,052 shares in respect of restricted stock units scheduled to vest on March 15, 2019 and 21,090 shares held in our 401(k) plan.

(16)

Number of shares beneficially owned and percentage ownership based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 4, 20191, 2022 by BlackRock, Inc. with respect to beneficial ownership of Dover common stock as of December 31, 2018.2021. BlackRock reported sole voting e power with regard to 9,182,312 of the shares and sole dispositive power with regard to 10,713,313 of such shares. BlackRock, Inc.’s offices are located at 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(17)(15)

Number of shares beneficially owned and percentage ownership based on information contained in a Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019January 10, 2022 by State Street CorporationJPMorgan Chase & Co. with respect to beneficial ownership of Dover common stock as of December 31, 2018. State Street Corporation’s offices are located at One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111.2021. JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported sole voting power with regard to 10,926,681 of the shares, shared voting power with regard to 14,491 of the shares, sole dispositive power with regard to 11,220,659 of the shares and shared dispositive power with regard to 42,143 of the shares. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s address is 383 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 100179.

(18)(16)

Number of shares beneficially owned and percentage ownership based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 20199, 2022 by The Vanguard Group with respect to beneficial ownership of Dover common stock as of December 31, 2018.2021. The Vanguard Group reported sole voting power with regard to none of the shares, shared voting power with regard to 226,974 of the shares, sole dispositive power with regard to 16,671,379 of the shares and shared dispositive power with regard to 577,667 of the shares. The Vanguard Group’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 81


SHARE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

(19)

Number of shares beneficially owned and percentage ownership based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 22, 2019 by JPMorgan Chase & Co. with respect to beneficial ownership of Dover common stock as of December 31, 2018. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s address is 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Board has adopted a policy that directors are expected to hold at any time a number of shares at least equal to the aggregate number of shares they received as the stock portion of their annual retainer during the past five years, net of an assumed 30% tax rate.

Executive officers are expected to hold a number of shares with a value at least equal to a multiple of their annual salary. For a discussion of the executive officer share ownership guidelines, see Executive Compensation —Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis Other Compensation Programs and Policies.”

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a)Elements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires that our directors and certain of our officers file reports of ownership and changes of ownership of our common stock with the SEC and the NYSE. Based solelyCompensation” on copies of such reports provided to us, we believe that all directors and officers filed on a timely basis all such reports required of them with respect to stock ownership and changes in ownership during 2018.page 60.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 8281


General Information About the Annual Meeting

We are providing this Proxy Statement to our shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board for use at the Annual Meeting. We are mailing this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement beginning on or about March 21, 2019.17, 2022.

Record Date

The record date for determining shareholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting is March 8, 2019.9, 2022. As of the close of business on that date, we had outstanding 145,213,280144,106,147 shares of common stock. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter.

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials

As permitted under SEC rules, we are making this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report to Shareholders (which includes our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (which is our Annual Report)2021) available to shareholders electronically via the internet. We believe electronic delivery expedites receipt of our proxy materials by shareholders, while lowering the costs and reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. If you receive a notice of internet availability of proxy materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials by mail unless you specifically request them. Instead, the notice of internet availability will provide instructions as to how you may review the proxy materials and submit your voting instructions over the internet. If you receive the notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, you should follow the instructions in the notice of internet availability for requesting a printed copy. In addition, the proxy card contains instructions for electing to receive proxy materials over the internet or by mail in future years.

Shareholders of Record; Beneficial Owners

Most holders of our common stock hold their shares beneficially through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than of record directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some differences in the way to vote shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered the shareholder of record of those shares, and the notice of internet availability or proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As a shareholder of record, you have the right to

grant your voting proxy directly to the persons named as proxy holders or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you received or requested printed copies of the proxy materials, Dover has enclosed a proxy card for you to use. You may also submit your proxy on the internet or by telephone as described in the proxy card.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee who is considered the shareholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you generally have the right to direct your broker on how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote those shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you have a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record of your shares. Your broker or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing your broker or nominee as to how to vote your shares. We strongly encourage you to instruct your broker or nominee how you wish to vote.

Vote Required; Abstentions and BrokerNon-Votes; Quorum

For Proposal 1, a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to elect each of the directors. This means that the number of votes cast “FOR” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that director in order for that director to be elected. Our organizational documents do not provide for cumulative voting.

Proposal 2 will require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.thereon.

Proposal 3 is a nonbinding, advisory resolution so its ultimate adoption is at the discretion of the Board. The affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meetingthereon will be deemed to be approval by the shareholders of Proposal 3.

ProposalsProposal 4 and 5 will require the affirmative vote of at least 80%a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Proposal 4 is a shareholder advisory resolution that will not itself effect any amendment to our outstanding shares of common stock.charter or by-laws.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 82


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

If you are a shareholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card or vote electronically without

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 83


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

making any specific selection, then your shares will be voted FOR all director nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3, 4 and 5.AGAINST Proposal 4.

If you specify that you wish to “ABSTAIN” from voting on an item, then your shares will not be voted on that particular item. Abstentions will not affect the outcome of the vote on Proposal 1. However, they will have the same effect as a vote against Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.4.

If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares through a broker or other nominee and do not provide your broker or nominee with voting instructions, the broker or nominee will have discretionary authority to vote your shares on routine matters only and will not vote your shares onnon-routine matters. This is generally referred to as a “brokernon-vote.” Only Proposal 2 will be considered a routine matter for the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, a broker or other nominee will not be able to vote on Proposals 1, 3, and 4 without voting instructions. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on ProposalProposals 1, but will have the same effect as a vote against Proposals 3 4 and 54 as they will not be counted as being present.present and entitled to vote on such proposals.

For purposes of the Annual Meeting, there will be a quorum if the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted for purposes of determining if a quorum is present.

Additional Matters

We have been notified that a beneficial owner may seek to present a shareholder proposal to adjourn the Annual Meeting to solicit the votes necessary to pass Proposals 4 and 5 if these proposals do not have the requisite votes to pass at the Annual Meeting (the “Additional Proposal”). We do not believe that the Additional Proposal was submitted to us in accordance with the advance notice requirements of our by-laws. However, if the Additional Proposal is considered at the Annual Meeting, it will require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the Additional Proposal. The Board’s designated proxyholders have discretionary authority to vote the proxies solicited by Dover on the Additional Proposal. If the Additional Proposal is considered at the Annual Meeting, the Board’s designated proxyholders intend to exercise their discretion to vote “AGAINST” it.

Voting Procedures

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or submit your proxy or voting instruction form over the internet, by telephone or by mail by following the instructions provided in our notice of internet availability, in the proxy materials or in the voting instruction form. If you hold your shares beneficially in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by your broker or nominee to vote your shares.

Revoking Your Proxy/Changing Your Voting Instructions

If you are a shareholder of record, whether you give your proxy over the internet, by telephone or by mail, you may revoke it at any time before it is exercised. You may submit a new proxy by using the internet or the telephone or by mailing a new proxy card bearing a later date so long as it is received before the Annual Meeting. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person, although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy. If you hold your shares beneficially in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by your broker or nominee as to how you may change your voting instructions.

Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

SEC rules permit us to deliver one copy of the Proxy Statement or a notice of internet availability of the Proxy Statement to multiple shareholders of record who share the same address and have the same last name, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of such shareholders. This delivery method, called “householding,” reduces our printing and mailing costs. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive or have internet access to separate proxy cards.

If you are a shareholder of record subject to householding and wish to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Statement or notice of internet availability of the proxy materials, now or in the future, at the same address or if you are currently receiving multiple copies of such materials at the same address and wish to receive only a single copy, please write to or call the Corporate Secretary, Dover Corporation, 3005 Highland Parkway, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, telephone:(630) 541-1540.

DOVER CORPORATION2019 Proxy Statement 84


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Beneficial owners sharing an address who are currently receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials or notice of internet availability of the proxy materials and wish to receive only a single copy in the future, or who currently receive a single copy and wish to receive separate copies in the future, should contact their bank, broker or other holder of record to request that only a single copy or separate copies, as the case may be, be delivered to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.

Proxy Solicitation Costs

We will pay the reasonable and actual costs of printing, mailing and soliciting proxies, but we will not pay a fee to any of our officers or employees or to officers or employees of any of our subsidiaries as compensation for soliciting proxies. We have retained Morrow Sodali, LLC to solicit brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries, and to send proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such shares, for a fee of approximately $20,000$12,000 plus expenses.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 83


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Other Matters

Our Board and management have not received notice of, and are not aware of, any business to come before the Annual Meeting other than the agenda items referred to in this Proxy Statement and the submission of the Additional Proposal.Statement. If, however, any other business properly comes before the meeting, the persons named as proxies will use their best judgment in voting the proxies.

Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 20202023 Annual Meeting

In order for shareholder proposals to be included in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 20202023 (the “2020“2023 Annual Meeting”), they must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 3005 Highland Parkway, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60515, no later than the close of business on November 22, 2019.17, 2022.

In 2016, we adopted a proxy access right to permit a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in ourby-laws. In order to be timely, notice of proxy access director nominees must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices at the address above no earlier than the open of business on October 23, 201918, 2022 and no later than the close of business on November 22, 201917, 2022 being, respectively, 150 days and 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date we first distributed this proxy statement.

All other shareholder nominations and proposals, in order to be voted on at the 20202023 Annual Meeting, must be received by us no earlier than the open of business on January 3, 2020,6, 2023, and no later than the close of business on February 2, 20205, 2023 being, respectively, 120 days and 90 days prior to the date of the first anniversary of the 20192022 Annual Meeting.

Where You Can Find Additional Information

Our website is located at www.dovercorporation.com. Although the information contained on or connected to our website is not part of this Proxy Statement, youYou can view additional information on our website, such as:

 

Charters of our Board committees

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

Code of Business Conduct & Ethics

 

Related Person Transactions Policy

 

Standards for Director Independence

 

Other governance materials and reports that we file with the SEC. Copies of these documents also may be obtained free of charge by writing or calling the Corporate Secretary, Dover Corporation, 3005 Highland Parkway, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, telephone:(630) 541-1540

All Dover Corporation website addresses contained in this proxy statement are intended to be inactive, textual references only. The information on, or accessible through, any such website identified in this proxy statement is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.

Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements that are inherently subject to uncertainties and risks. We caution investors to be guided in their analysis of Dover by referring to the documents we file with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form10-K for 2019,2021, for a list of factors that could cause our results to differ from those anticipated in any such forward-looking statements.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 8584


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

Non-GAAP Disclosures

In an effort to provide investors with additional information regarding our results as determined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we also disclosenon-GAAP information that we believe provides useful information to investors. Adjusted net earnings, and adjusted diluted net earnings per common share, total segment earnings (EBIT), adjusted segment EBIT, adjusted segment EBIT margin, free cash flow, free cash flow as a percentage of revenue, free cash flow as a percentage of earnings, and organic revenue growth are not financial measures under GAAP and should not be considered as a substitute for net earnings, or diluted net earnings per common share, cash flows from operating activities, or revenue as determined in accordance with GAAP, and they may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Adjusted Net Earnings Per Share

(in millions, except per share data)  2021  2020  2019 

Adjusted net earnings:

    

Net earnings

  $1,124  $683  $678 

Acquisition-related amortization, pre-tax 1

   142   139   138 

Acquisition-related amortization, tax impact 2

   (35  (34  (35

Rightsizing and other costs, pre-tax 3

   38   51   32 

Rightsizing and other costs, tax impact 2

   (7  (11  (7

Gain on dispositions, pre-tax 4

   (206  (5   

Gain on dispositions, tax impact 2

   53   1    

Loss on extinguishment of debt, pre-tax 5

         24 

Loss on extinguishment of debt, tax impact 2

         (5

Loss on assets held for sale 6

         47 
  

 

 

 

Adjusted net earnings

    $        1,109  $        824  $        872 
  

 

 

 

Diluted average shares outstanding

   145   145   147 

Adjusted diluted net earnings per common share*:

    

Net earnings

    $7.74  $4.70  $4.61 

Acquisition-related amortization, pre-tax 1

   0.98   0.95   0.94 

Acquisition-related amortization, tax impact 2

   (0.24  (0.24  (0.24

Rightsizing and other costs, pre-tax 3

   0.26   0.35   0.22 

Rightsizing and other costs, tax impact 2

   (0.05  (0.07  (0.06

Gain on dispositions, pre-tax 4

   (1.42  (0.03   

Gain on dispositions, tax impact 2

   0.37   0.01    

Loss on extinguishment of debt, pre-tax 5

         0.16 

Loss on extinguishment of debt, tax impact 2

         (0.04

Loss on assets held for sale 6

         0.32 
  

 

 

 

Adjusted diluted net earnings per common share

  $7.63  $5.67  $5.93 
  

 

 

 

¹ Includes amortization on acquisition-related intangible assets and inventory step-up.

2 Adjustments were tax effected using the statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions or the effective tax rate, where applicable, for each period.

3 Rightsizing and other costs include actions taken on employee reductions, facility consolidations and site closures, product line exits and other asset charges. 2021 includes a $12.1 million other than temporary impairment charge related to an equity method investment and a $6.1 million write-off of assets incurred in connection with an exit from continuing operations arecertain Latin America countries within our Climate & Sustainability Technologies segment, as well as a $9.1 million payment received for previously incurred restructuring costs related to a product line exit in our Engineered Products segment.

4 2021 represents a $181.6 million gain on the disposition of Unified Brands, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company within the Climate & Sustainability Technologies segment, and a $24.7 million gain on disposition of our Race Winning Brands equity method investment in the Engineered Products segment. 2020 represents a $5.2 million net gain on the sale of AMS Chino within the Climate & Sustainability Technologies segment, including working capital adjustments.

5 Represents a loss on early extinguishment of €300.0 million 2.125% notes due 2020 and $450.0 million 4.30% notes due 2021.

DOVER CORPORATION2022 Proxy Statement 85


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

6 Represents a loss on assets held for sale of Finder Pompe S.r.l. (“Finder”). Under local law, no tax benefit is realized from the loss on the sale of a wholly-owned business.

* Per share data and totals may be impacted by rounding.

Adjusted Segment EBIT Margin

Segment earnings (EBIT) is adjusted by the effect of acquisition-related amortization, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, gains on disposition of businesses, disposition costs, rightsizing and other costs, loss on assets held for sale, and a product recall reserve reversalgain on dispositions to derive at total adjusted segment earnings (EBIT). Total adjusted segment earnings (EBIT) is divided by total segment revenue to derive at adjusted earnings from continuing operations and adjusted diluted earnings per common sharesegment EBIT margin as follows:

 

  (in millions, except per share data)  2018  2017 

 Adjusted earnings from continuing operations:

   

 Earnings from continuing operations

  $591  $747 

 Acquisition-related amortization,pre-tax1

   146   151 

 Acquisition-related amortization, tax impact2

   (37  (49

 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 3

   (3  (55

 Gain on dispositions,pre-tax4

      (205

 Gain on dispositions, tax impact2

      33 

 Disposition costs,pre-tax5

      5 

 Disposition costs, tax impact2

      (2

 Rightsizing and other costs,pre-tax6

   73   49 

 Rightsizing and other costs, tax impact2

   (15  (15

 Product recall reversal,pre-tax

      (7

 Product recall reversal, tax impact2

      3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Adjusted earnings from continuing operations

  $                756  $                655 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Diluted average shares outstanding

   152   158 

 Adjusted diluted earnings per common share:

   

 Earnings from continuing operations

  $3.89  $4.73 

 Acquisition-related amortization,pre-tax1

   0.96   0.96 

 Acquisition-related amortization, tax impact2

   (0.24  (0.31

 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 3

   (0.02  (0.35

 Gain on dispositions,pre-tax4

      (1.30

 Gain on dispositions, tax impact2

      0.21 

 Disposition costs,pre-tax5

      0.03 

 Disposition costs, tax impact2

      (0.01

 Rightsizing and other costs,pre-tax6

   0.48   0.31 

 Rightsizing and other costs, tax impact2

   (0.10  (0.09

 Product recall reversal,pre-tax

      (0.04

 Product recall reversal, tax impact2

      0.02 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Adjusted diluted earnings per common share

  $4.97  $4.15 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
(in thousands)  2021  2020  2019 

Segment earnings (EBIT)

    

Engineered Products

  $285,511  $238,167  $291,848 

Clean Energy & Fueling

   271,388   236,974   231,873 

Imaging & Identification

   237,147   193,473   229,484 

Pumps & Process Solutions

   546,863   305,276   240,081 

Climate & Sustainability Technologies

   322,622   102,872   118,832 
  

 

 

 

Total segment earnings (EBIT) 1

   1,663,531   1,076,762   1,112,118 

Rightsizing and other costs 2

   33,907   44,171   26,555 

Loss on assets held for sale 3

         46,946 

Gain on dispositions 4

   (206,338  (5,213   
  

 

 

 

Adjusted segment EBIT

  $ 1,491,100  $ 1,115,720  $ 1,185,619 
  

 

 

 
    

Adjusted segment EBIT margin

   18.9%   16.7%   16.6%  

¹ Refer to the table below for reconciliation of total segment earnings (EBIT) to net earnings.

2 Rightsizing and other costs include actions taken on employee reductions, facility consolidations and site closures, product line exits and other asset charges. 2021 includes a $9,078 payment received for previously incurred restructuring costs related to a product line exit in our Engineered Products segment, as well as a $12,073 other than temporary impairment charge related to an equity method investment and a $6,072 write-off of assets incurred in connection with an exit from certain Latin America countries within our Climate & Sustainability Technologies segment.

3 Represents a loss on assets held for sale for Finder. Under local law, no tax benefit is realized from the loss on the sale of a wholly-owned business.

4 2021 represents a $181,615 gain on the disposition of Unified Brands, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company within the Climate & Sustainability Technologies segment, and a $24,723 gain on disposition of our Race Winning Brands equity method investment in the Engineered Products segment. 2020 represents a $5,213 net gain on the sale of AMS Chino within the Climate & Sustainability Technologies segment, including working capital adjustments.

(in thousands)  2021  2020  2019 

Net earnings:

    

Total segment earnings (EBIT)

  $1,663,531  $ 1,076,762  $ 1,112,118 

Corporate expense / other

   160,827   126,662   147,817 

Interest expense

   106,319   111,937   125,818 

Interest income

   (4,441  (3,571  (4,526
  

 

 

 

Net earnings before provision for income taxes

   1,400,826   841,734   843,009 

Provision for income taxes

   277,008   158,283   165,091 
  

 

 

 

Net earnings

  $ 1,123,818  $683,451  $677,918 
  

 

 

 

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 86


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow represents net cash provided by operating activities minus capital expenditures as follows:

(in thousands)  2021  2020  2019 

Cash flow from operating activities

  $ 1,115,865  $ 1,104,810  $945,306 

Less: Capital expenditures

   (171,465  (165,692  (186,804
  

 

 

 

Free cash flow

  $944,400  $939,118  $758,502 
  

 

 

 
    

Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue

   11.9%   14.1%   10.6%  

Free cash flow as a percentage of net earnings

   84.0%   137.4%   111.9%  

Organic Revenue Growth Factor

*
2021
Full Year

Organic

15.3

Acquisitions

1.3

Dispositions

(0.2)

Currency translation

1.9

Per share data and totals may be impacted by rounding.

1

Amortization expense of intangibles and inventory write up related to business acquisitions.

2

Total

Adjustments were tax effected using the statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions or the effective tax rate, where applicable, for each period.

3

2017 tax impact primarily related to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act. This benefit also includes decreases in statutory tax rates of foreign jurisdictions. 2018 adjustment represents tax benefits related to additional Tax Refrom Act regulatory guidance covered by SAB 118.

4

Includes gains from the sales of Performance Motorsports International and Warn Industries, Inc. (“Warn”) in the first and fourth quarters of 2017, respectively.

518.3

Disposition costs include costs related to the fourth quarter 2017 sale of Warn.

6

Rightsizing and other costs include actions taken on employee reductions, facility consolidations and site closures, product line exits and other associated asset charges.

Non-GAAP Disclosures

Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations represents net earnings from continuing operations adjusted for the effect of acquisition-related amortization, the Tax Reform Act, gains on disposition of businesses, disposition costs, rightsizing and other costs, gain on dispositions, loss on extinguishment of debt, and a product recall reserve reversal.loss on assets held for sale. We excludeafter-tax acquisition-related amortization because the amount and timing of such charges are significantly impacted by the timing, size, number and nature of the acquisitions we consummate.the Company consummates. We exclude the other items because they occur for reasons that may be unrelated to ourthe Company’s commercial performance during the period and/or we believeManagement believes they are not indicative of ourthe Company’s ongoing operating costs or gains in a given period. We believe this information

Adjusted diluted net earnings per share represents adjusted net earnings divided by average diluted shares.

Total segment earnings (EBIT) is defined as net earnings before income taxes, net interest expense, and corporate expenses. Total segment earnings (EBIT) margin is defined as total segment earnings (EBIT) divided by revenue.

Management believes these measures are useful to investors to better understand ourthe Company’s ongoing profitability as it will better reflect ourthe Company’s core operating results, offer more transparency and facilitate easier comparability to prior and future periods and to its peers. Adjusted diluted earnings per common share

Free cash flow represents adjustednet cash provided by operating activities minus capital expenditures. Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue equals free cash flow divided by revenue. Free cash flow as a percentage of net earnings equals free cash flow divided by average diluted shares.net earnings. Management believes that free cash flow and free cash flow ratios are important measures of operating performance because they provide management and investors a measurement of cash generated from operations that is available for mandatory payment obligations and investment opportunities, such as funding acquisitions, paying dividends, repaying debt and repurchasing our common stock.

Management believes that reporting organic revenue growth, which excludes the impact of foreign currency exchange rates and the impact of acquisitions and dispositions, provides a useful comparison of our revenue performance and trends between periods.

 

DOVER CORPORATION20192022 Proxy Statement 87


Appendix ALOGO

PROPOSED AMENDMENTSCAN TO ARTICLE FIFTEENTHVIEW MATERIALS & VOTE w DOVER CORPORATION 3005 HIGHLAND PARKWAY VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 3, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE THE SUPER-MAJORITY

VOTE REQUIREMENT EXPLAINED IN PROPOSAL 4

(matterFUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to be deleted is stricken)

FIFTEENTH: (A) (1) Except as otherwise expressly providedreduce the costs incurred by our company in paragraph (A)(2) below, any purchase bymailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the corporation, or any subsidiary ofInternet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the corporation, of Voting Shares (as hereinafter defined) from a person or persons known by the corporation to be an Interested Stockholder (as hereinafter defined) at a per share price in excess of the Market Price (as hereinafter defined) at the time of such purchase of the shares so purchased, shall require the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of all then outstanding Voting Shares not beneficially owned by the Interested Stockholder, voting together as a single class. Such affirmative vote shall be required notwithstanding the fact that no vote may be required, or that a lesser percentage or separate class vote may be specified, by law or in any agreement with any national securities exchange or otherwise.

(2) The provisions of Paragraph (A)(1) of this Article Fifteenth shall not be applicable to any purchase of Voting Shares, if such purchase is pursuant to (i) an offer, made available on the same terms, to the holders of all of the outstanding shares of the same class of those purchased or (ii) a purchase program effected on the open market and not the result of a privately-negotiated transaction.

(B) (1) In the event that there shall exist a Substantial Stockholder (as hereinafter defined) of the corporation and such existence shall be known or made known to the corporation in advance of a meeting of stockholders at which directors will be elected, each holder of Voting Shares shall be entitled, in connection with any vote taken for such election of directors, to as many votes as shall equal the number of votes which (except for this provision as to cumulative voting) such stockholder would be entitled to cast for the election of directors with respect to such stockholder’s Voting Shares multiplied by the number of directors to be elected, and such stockholder may cast all of such votes for a single director may distribute them among the number of directors to be voted for, or for any two or more of them as such stockholder may see fit.

(2) In connection with any election of directors in which stockholders are entitled to cumulative voting:

(a) The Board of Directors shall appoint a committee (the “Committee”) consisting of three Directors.

(b) The Committee shall send to all stockholders of the corporation entitledinstructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 3, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the election of directors at least 90 days in advance of such election a written notice informing stockholders (i) that the cumulative voting provisions of this Article will be in effect, (ii) that persons meeting the eligibility requirements of subparagraph (B)(2)(c) may submit nominationspostage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to the Committee, if such nominations are received at least 60 days in advance of the election and contain relevant information concerning the nominee, including all information required to be included in a proxy statement under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations thereunder (or any subsequent provisions replacing such Act, rules or regulations), and the nominee’s consent to be nominated, and (iii) as to the time, place and date of the meeting at which such election will be held.

(c) The Committee will review all nominees, and the corporation’s proxy materials being prepared in connection with such meeting will include information relating to, and afford stockholders the opportunity to vote for, all nominees who are included by the Committee in the corporation’s proxy materials. The Committee shall be required to include in such proxy materials at least one nominee of each stockholder or group of stockholders who beneficially own Voting Shares with a Market Price (as herein defined) of at least $250,000 at the time notice of such meeting is sent to stockholders and who submit the information required with respect to such nominee under subparagraph (B)(2)(b). The Committee may include more than one nominee of such person or persons, provided that the number of nominees included by the Committee which are submitted by any one person or group of persons may not exceed the number of directors to be elected at such a meeting.

(d) The corporation’s proxy statement and other communications with respect to the election shall contain, on an equal basis and at the expense of the corporation, descriptions and other statements of or with respect to all nominees for election which qualify under the procedures set forth in this Article.

(3) If necessary to assure that the provisions of this Paragraph (B) are fairly applied and complied with, the Board of Directors may postpone any meeting of stockholders to which this Article would apply for such period of time as shall be necessary to permit the Committee to perform its responsibilities hereunder.

(4) Notwithstanding any other provision which may be contained from time to time in this Certificate of Incorporation or theby-laws of the corporation concerning the manner in which the size of the Board of Directors of the corporation may be established or changed, in the event that a person becomes a Substantial Stockholder, the number of directors at the time such person becomes a Substantial Stockholder shall remain fixed and may not be changed by the Board of Directors or the stockholders until such time as such person is no longer a Substantial Stockholder.

(C) For purposes of this Article Fifteenth:

(1) “Interested Stockholder” shall mean any person (other than the corporation or any Subsidiary; and other than any profit sharing, employee stock ownership, or other employee benefit plan of the corporation or any subsidiary, or any trustee of or fiduciary with respect to any such plan when acting in such capacity) who or which:

(a) is the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of not less than 5% of the Voting Shares and has been such a beneficial owner for less than four years; or

(b) is an Affiliate of the corporation and at any time within two years prior thereto was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, for a period of less than four years of not less than 5% of the then outstanding Voting Shares; or

(c) is an assignee of or has otherwise succeeded to any shares of capital stock of the corporation which were at any time within two years prior thereto beneficially owned by any Interested Stockholder and such assignment or succession shall have occurred in the course of a transaction or series of transactions not involving a public offering within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933.

(2) The term “Substantial Stockholder” shall mean any person (other than the corporation or any Subsidiary; and other than any profit sharing, employee stock ownership or other employee benefit plan of the corporation or any subsidiary, or any trustee of or fiduciary with respect to any such plan when acting in such capacity) who or which is the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of not less than 40% of the Voting Shares.

(3) For the purpose of determining whether a person is an Interested Stockholder or a Substantial Stockholder, the number of Voting Shares deemed to be outstanding shall include shares deemed beneficially owned by such person through application of subparagraph (4) of Paragraph (C) of Article Fourteenth, but shall not include any other Voting Shares that may be issuable pursuant to any agreement, or upon exercise of conversion rights, warranties or options, or otherwise.

(4) For purposes of this Article Fifteenth, the terms “Voting Shares,” “beneficial owner,” “person,” “Affiliate,” “Associate,” “Subsidiary,” and “Market Price” shall have the meanings set forth in Article Fourteenth of this Certificate of Incorporation, except that “Market Price” shall mean the last closing sale price or the last closing bid quotation immediately preceding the date in question instead of the highest closing sale price or the highest closing bid quotation during the30-day period immediately preceding the date in question; and

(D) The Board of Directors shall have the power and the duty to determine for the purposes of this Article Fifteenth (a) whether the provisions of the Article are applicable to a particular transaction, (b) whether a person is an Interested Stockholder or a Substantial Stockholder, (c) the number of Voting Shares or other securities beneficially

owned by any person, (d) whether a person is an Affiliate or Associate of another, (e) what the Market Price is and whether a price is above the Market Price as of a given date, and (f) whether any person nominating directors in accordance with Paragraph B.2. beneficially owns Voting Shares with an aggregate Market Price of at least $250,000.

(E) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Certificate of Incorporation or theBy-laws of the corporation to the contrary (and notwithstanding the fact that a lesser percentage may be specified by law, this Certificate of Incorporation or theby-laws of the corporation), any amendment, alteration, change or repeal of this Article Fifteenth of this Certificate of Incorporation shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the then outstanding Voting Shares; provided, however, that this Paragraph E shall not apply to and such 80% vote shall not be required for, any amendment, alteration, change or repeal recommended to the stockholders by the majority vote of the Board of Directors and at the time such amendment, alteration, change or repeal is under consideration there is, to the knowledge of the Board of Directors, neither an Interested Stockholder nor a Substantial Stockholder.

Appendix B

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTEENTH OF RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE THE SUPER-MAJORITY

VOTE REQUIREMENT EXPLAINED IN PROPOSAL 5

(matter to be deleted is stricken)

SIXTEENTH: No action required to be taken or which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of the corporation may be taken without a meeting, and the power of stockholders to consent in writing, without a meeting, to the taking of any action is specifically denied.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Certificate of Incorporation or theBy-laws of the corporation to the contrary (and notwithstanding the fact that a lesser percentage may be specified by law, this Certificate of Incorporation or theBy-laws of the corporation), any amendment, alternation, change or repeal of this Article Sixteenth of this Certificate of Incorporation shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the then outstanding Voting Shares; provided, however, that such 80% vote of the then outstanding vote shall not required for, any amendment, alteration, change or repeal recommended to the stockholders by the majority vote of the Board of Directors and at the time such amendment, alteration, change or repeal is under consideration there is, to the knowledge of the Board of Directors, neither an Interested Stockholder nor a Substantial Stockholder.

LOGO

DOVER CORPORATION

3005 HIGHLAND PARKWAY

DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E62269-P17210-Z73847 D67671-P66680-Z81818 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY DOVER CORPORATION The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each director under Item 1: 1. Election of Directors For Against Abstain 1a. D. L. DeHaas The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ! ! ! Items 2 and 3: For Against Abstain 1b. H. J. Gilbertson, Jr. 2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ! ! ! as our independent registered public accounting ?rm ! ! ! for 2022. 1c. K. C. Graham ! ! ! 3. To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive of?cer ! ! ! compensation. 1d. M. F. Johnston ! ! ! The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Item 4: 1e. E. A. Spiegel ! ! ! 4. To consider a shareholder proposal regarding the right to ! ! ! allow shareholders to act by written consent. 1f. R. J. Tobin ! ! ! NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 1g. S. M. Todd ! ! ! 1h. S. K. Wagner ! ! ! 1i. K. E. Wandell ! ! ! 1j. M. A. Winston ! ! ! Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other ?duciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized of?cer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

DOVER CORPORATION

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR each

director under Item 1:

1.  Election of Directors

For

Against

Abstain

1a.     H. J. Gilbertson, Jr.

1b.     K. C. Graham

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR Items 2, 3, 4 and 5:ForAgainstAbstain

1c.     M. F. Johnston

2.    To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.

1d.     E. A. Spiegel

1e.     R. J. Tobin

3.    To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive officer compensation.

1f.      S. M. Todd

1g.     S. K. Wagner

4.    To approve amendments to Article 15 of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the super-majority voting requirement.

  ☐

1h.     K. E. Wandell

1i.      M. A. Winston

5.    To approve amendments to Article 16 of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the super-majority voting requirement.

  ☐

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]    

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date


LOGO

WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING,

BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.

Internet and telephone voting are available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time

the day before the annual meeting date.

Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote these shares in the

same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

INTERNET

http://www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to vote your proxy.

Have your proxy card in hand when

you access the website.

OR

TELEPHONE

1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to

vote your proxy. Have your proxy

card in hand when you call.

INTERNET OR TELEPHONE http://www.proxyvote.com 1-800-690-6903 Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Use any touch-tone telephone to Have your proxy card in hand when vote your proxy. Have your proxy you access the website. card in hand when you call. If you vote your proxy by Internet or telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.

To vote by mail, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

E62270-P17210-Z73847        

www.proxyvote.com. D67672-P66680-Z81818 PROXY

DOVER CORPORATION

PROXY SOLICITED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR ANNUAL MEETING

MAY 2, 2019

6, 2022 The undersigned hereby appoints Richard J. Tobin, Brad M. Cerepak and Ivonne M. Cabrera, and each of them, as the undersigned’s proxy or proxies, each with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of Common Stock of Dover Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in Fort Lauderdale, FLDowners Grove, IL on May 2, 20196, 2022 at 1:9:00 P.M.A.M., local time, and any adjournments thereof, as fully as the undersigned could if personally present, upon the proposals set forth on the reverse side hereof, revoking any proxy or proxies heretofore given. For participants in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan, this proxy will govern the voting of stock held for the account of the undersigned in the Plan.

IMPORTANT - IMPORTANT—You have the option of voting these shares by returning the enclosed proxy card, voting via Internet or by using a toll-free telephone number above and on the reverse side. On the reverse side of this proxy card are instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone. If you vote by either of these methods, your vote will be recorded as if you mailed in your proxy card. If you vote by returning this proxy card, you must sign and date this proxy on the reverse side.

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE ON THE REVERSE SIDE, BUT IF NO CHOICES ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3 4 AND 5.

AGAINST PROPOSAL 4. Continued and to be signed on reverse side